18.2 C
Byron Shire
June 15, 2024

Kings Forest fauna ‘at risk’

Latest News

Youth suicide?

ABC News reporting on youth suicide in remote communities at an alarming rate? The Elders are using Aussie Rules...

Other News

Cynical Swivel

I was utterly horrified to hear Cr Mark Swivel touting a ‘community land trust for conservation’ concept as his...

Man dies following fatal crash – Yorklea, south of Casino

About 1am on Thursday emergency services responded to reports after a vehicle crashed into a tree.

Are you a thinking of running for council? Time for women to step up?

Council elections are coming on September 14 and there is a call for women to step up and stand...

Cinema: The Way, My Way

This is the charming and captivating true story of a stubborn, self-centred Australian man who decides to walk the 800-kilometre-long Camino de Santiago pilgrimage route through Spain.

Chinny Charge entries now open!

Now’s the time to enter the Chinny Charge up Mullumbimby’s local mountain on Saturday, September 21.  The annual run and...

Is consciousness necessary?

As science progresses the magical, spiritual, perceptions of the world fall away into the garbage trucks that pass by...

Luis Feliu

Koala and threatened species management plans by the developers of the Kings Forest township have been slammed as inadequate in an ecological review for the state government.

The review by Eco Logical Australia for the planning department, which is assessing the first stage of the massive development for 4,500 homes, says the plans lack much detail ‘leaving open the potential for inadequate management’ over the 872 hectares.

The review comes as the federal government considers the impact of the proposed new township southwest of Kingscliff on nationally threatened species, especially the Wallum sedge frog, under the federal Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act.

The review is highly critical, saying that, overall, management measures by the Leda group proposed for the first stage to lessen impacts on threatened species, especially koalas and Wallum frogs, have ‘numerous information gaps and inconsistencies’.

The Sydney-based manager of the ecological firm, Robert Mezzatesta, told the planning department that the many plans for the development, including those for weeds, buffers, threatened species, wildlife corridors and vegetation, contained ‘an excessive amount of repetition of information’.

‘While a large amount of information is provided in the management plans, the relationship between the various documents and plans is quite complex and sometimes unclear. There is often a lack of detail within the plans that has left a number of issues unresolved, leaving open the potential for inadequate management over the site,’ Mr Mezzatesta said.

He said it would be ‘more practical to have each management plan presented as one document with separate sections for the different areas (groups of precincts) where appropriate’.

The review looked at measures to ensure the safe passage of koalas and other wildlife between habitat areas on the site but noted a proposed east–west wildlife corridor of a minimum of 50 metres wide had not been identified.

The review says wildlife corridors are essential for maintaining populations of threatened species at the site and the koala was ‘a keystone species in this respect’, but the lack of an east–west corridor was justified by the lack of koala habitat at the western end of the site.

‘However, other threatened species will benefit from the provision of an east–west wildlife corridor, particularly less mobile species,’ it said.

It said environmental protection zones (EPZ) across the centre of the site provided ‘good connectivity with Cudgen Nature Reserve to the east, which was vital for the conservation of the Tweed Coast koala population’.

But ‘if the east–west corridor is not provided, there are potential impacts on fauna movements and habitat connectivity at a regional scale, with reduced connectivity to the north west and south west of the Kings Forest site’.

Loss of habitat

It said council had noted that a small outlier koala population existed at Eviron and ‘such habitat connectivity would be reduced by the loss of habitat at the western edge of the development without the provision of a wildlife corridor’.

‘The safe passage of wildlife across the site has not been addressed for individual threatened species, but has focused on the movement of koalas throughout the site, the review said.

‘Therefore, it appears that provision of fencing and the measures outlined above and in the koala plan of management assumes to benefit all fauna species, but without any assessment to demonstrate this.’

The review also notes that the developer’s management plans do not mention 12 listed or threatened fauna species from a total of 27 documented in an environmental assessment of the site.

The review said the developer’s environmental assessment ‘fails to adequately assess the presence of aquatic flora and fauna and the likely impacts of the proposal on these aquatic ecosystems. The assessment should also include assessing the quality and quantity of stormwater and floodwater discharges into Cudgen Creek Estuary’.

Meanwhile the National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) is yet to decide whether to prosecute the developer for alleged unauthorised clearing and draining of parts of the Cudgen Nature Reserve adjacent to the site, despite investigating the issue for over eight months.

Authorities recently implicated Leda, owned by billionaire developer Bob Ell, in the massive illegal vegetation clearing in the nature reserve along Blacks Creek. But the property group claimed workmen bulldozed trees and other vegetation along a 300-metre stretch inside the protected area by accident.

Greens MP Cate Faehrmann last year launched a scathing attack in parliament over the illegal clearing, saying that if guilty, the property mogul should be hit with the most severe penalty available. Ms Faehrmann said Mr Ell and his company had a history of illegal clearing and used intimidation and bullying tactics against people to get their way.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

1 COMMENT

  1. The handling of the Kings Forest Part 3A Planning Significant State Site by the previous NSW Labour Government was a disgrace, as planning permission for such a large scaled development within such an obvious non ecologically sustainable framework should never have been given, from the very beginning. Only now, as our precious environmental volunteers of the Tweed become overworked and stressed from holding the fort for the Tweed Coast’s valuable natural resources, within and about the degraded land that is called Kings Forest, is the Australian Department of Environment finally saying that they will look into it. The lack of action by the NPWS of NSW hints at something more than a legal delay, when it comes to the illegal clearing about Kings Forest. It is time for the individuals who have resolved to allow the development to proceed (both in the past and the present), in its current NSW PLanning Form, to be looked into. It is time every single person who has signed off on stages of this development to answer to an independent inquiry. Superficial yet complex planning documents and processes have taken over from what is clearly an on the ground devestation of a beautiful natural resource with inherent potential to become a vaste and valuable natural heritage for the future populations of the Tweed Coast. I, for one, believe that this land, Kings Forest, in its entirety, should be taken back from its environmentally irresponsible custodians. If land can be resumed for the betterment of the whole of society, (ie, such as land being taken for development of “much needed housing” and “essential energy supplies”) in other areas of the state of NSW, then surely the Tweed Coast’s Kings Forest, can be taken by the State of NSW for “much needed flora, fauna, ecological and ecosystem HEALTH, well being and local and regional environmental health and survival”. Take a look at google maps, google earth pics of the site. If all of the remaining undeveloped Tweed Coast was managed like Kings Forest, then it would be a Tweed Shire disaster. And that is just from an aerial perspective. What is going down, at the ground level? It is time some authentic land and water managers got in there to really see what has been going on. This is more than smoke and mirrors. This is a machination of ignorance, a peversion of ecologically sustainable management.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Affordable housing

I’m wondering how long before the temporary emergency disaster relief housing project on Prince Street, Mullumbimby becomes permanent, or has that happened already? Don’t...

Housing waiting lists jump over 100 per cent for Northern Rivers

Crisis response needed from NSW state government as listings for priority housing increase over 100 per cent in multiple Northern Rivers regions.

Editorial – Should Mullum’s water remain locally sourced?

The push by members of Council’s Water and Sewer Advisory Committee (WSAC) to retain Mullum’s local water supply is heating up...

Relocalising to find the life we all dream of

Everywhere we look we see signs of economic downturn, environmental destruction and social breakdown. It’s easy to wonder how we can ever improve our lives and those of our kids.