19.4 C
Byron Shire
March 9, 2021

Byron Council rejects amalgamation proposal

Latest News

Seapeace: the late Tony Maxwell’s wetland legacy

Many curious minds have pondered the purpose of the rice paddy-like waterbodies that scallop the contour lines out into the Ewingsdale coastal plain that can be viewed from St Helena Road.

Other News

Mandy Nolan’s Soapbox: Dear Brittany

We watched you. We watched you break the silence. We heard the truth shatter like a glass hitting the tiles.

Top of Mt Warning

Daniel O’Brien, Federal Letters about Mt Warning were interesting. Chris Gee defended National Parks and Wildlife for adopting the views of...

Democracy

Jo Faith, Newtown Thank you all at The Echo for upholding independent journalism. For readers and activists concerned about the demise...

Koala groups lobby Tweed MP Geoff Provest for action

Local koala groups have been taking action to protect NSW koalas by meeting with Tweed State Member of Parliament, Geoff Provest seeking his support for action on koala protections and asking him not to support the koala killing legislation his government are putting forward.

Suspicion and belief

Fast Buck$, Coorabell My suspicion is that the mayor and the senior staff have been helping Michael Lyon become electable...

Question for Bob Carr

Simon Alderton, Murwillumbah I hope Kerry O’Brien asks Bob Carr (in their ‘conversations’ at Byron Theatre on Friday, 5 March) if...

Hans Lovejoy

The idea of amalgamating Byron Shire with another local council – which was raised last week by Byron United president Paul Waters – has been knocked back by the mayor and deputy mayor.

Mr Waters is seeking feedback from his members for the proposal, which he says could create ‘economies of scale’ that would alleviate the Shire’s deteriorating infrastructure. The comments come after Byron Shire Council’s (BSC) 2012–13 budget and long-term outlook, which sees BSC continue to struggle financially with a relatively small rate-base.

Mr Waters told Echonetdaily, ‘Economy of scale seems to work for larger councils and other council areas that have been subjected to amalgamation in Queensland and Victoria’.

But councillors have disagreed with the idea, saying the blame lies with the state government’s policies and inaction.

Mayor Jan Barham told Echonetdaily it would be a disastrous outcome for Byron Shire.

‘No doubt we need more money, but it wouldn’t solve any major issues financially and it would take away the autonomy of our residents. We have a right to be different; our reputation is built on that as well as our efforts to protect diversity in the region.’

She said she’s been lobbying at state level for more council infrastructure in recognition of the pressure that tourism puts on councils. ‘The only funding from the state government that councils receive [in relation to high-level tourism] is tourism marketing,’ she said.

Region doesn’t have to change: Waters

Mr Waters argues, however, that our region doesn’t have to change to accommodate other shires.

‘As an example, Cassowary Coast incorporating Mission Beach (not unlike Byron Shire) have amalgamated with surrounding shires. Tully is still Tully, Innisfail is still Innisfail, Cardwell is still Cardwell… and Mission Beach is still like Byron. It’s a fear that is unfounded – parochialism, or at worst, a drawbridge mentality. I do agree with the mayor that both state and federal governments should tip funds into infrastructure like foreshore parks, toilets and some roads. The old “blame tourism” comment is wearing a bit thin as it’s only a part of the problem.’

Cr Basil Cameron also weighed in, saying that the low rate-base is only part of the story.

‘A major reason for the infrastructure backlog in Byron Shire is the large number of visitors to the area who are unable to make a financial contribution to the local area through measures such as a bed-tax because of state government restrictions.

‘Rate pegging does not allow high-growth coastal areas such as Byron Shire to keep service and infrastructure provision up to the pace of population and visitor growth. Cost shifting continues to be a burden for local government taking around six per cent of rate revenues.

‘Byron Shire receives the lowest amount of federal Financial Assistance Grants paid through the state government compared to other local government areas in the northern rivers. Over the last ten years, Byron Shire has received more than $50 million less than the highest recipient in the region (Richmond Valley).’

Failure of state govt: Cr Cameron

‘A key issue for northern rivers communities has been the failure of successive state governments to provide infrastructure within the region, especially in the critical areas of regional roads and public transport. The state government needs to reform the policy framework it sets for local government and rapidly increase funding for infrastructure if the financial sustainability of local government is to be improved.’

 


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

1 COMMENT

  1. There has to be a balance between area use and how to pay for it, amalgamation or not.

    What the world does commonly is to have a built in overnight staying tax for tourists. Hawaii was about 12.2% a few years ago, and things are looked after. This also gives the visitor the dignity of being allowed to cover their use. The % can be set to suit balance.

    In Byron, it cannot be expected that 14-15,000 rate payers should or could cover 1-2 million plus visitors use costs.

    The state law blocking this tax is from 1993, way out of touch, and does not really address this needed balance or the large added cost problem, or tourism costs, extreme in Byron Shire and elsewhere.

    All councils should come together, change the old antiquated state law and do just what CR Basil Cameron sees..bring a “bed” tax, an overnight staying tax, a visitor use tax, an infrastructure support tax, whatever you want to call it, into use.
    Ballina has a “pedestal tax” to get around a bad state law, but its the state ignorance that has to be stopped.

    Its a world proven idea and would help all councils maintain their area, to everyone’s benefit. A great one to go after Basil, thanks!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Caravan park to pay $2.3mil plus to consumers

The NSW Court of Appeal has upheld the Supreme Court’s decision arising from the sale of the movable dwellings located on waterfront sites along the Tweed River.

Government modelling fails to reflect women’s interrupted careers

New research to be released this week analyses two decades of Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey to estimate the actual labour force experience of women over their life and accounts for working when super is not paid.

Ballina cleans up!

Clean Up Australia Day was a great success in Ballina, with the beach clean up event organised by Ballina Coastcare yesterday attracting twenty volunteers.

Lismore future councillor information sessions

With the delayed Local Government elections being held in September, several councils, including Lismore City Council, are holding information sessions for community members who are thinking about running for Council.