21 C
Byron Shire
March 28, 2024

Leda prosecuted over clearing

Latest News

Splendour 2024 cancelled

It's official, Splendour in the Grass 2024 has been cancelled.

Other News

Belongil Beach nude bathing

I am very concerned about the proposed revocation of legal clothing-optional beach use at Tyagarah. When I was last in...

Way of the dog

One of the more disappointing aspects of the decline of Byron Bay, and I have a long list, is...

Peter Garrett gives Bluesfest the nod

If I say the words ‘US Forces give the nod’, I can pretty much guarantee that you will hear the unmistakable voice of Peter Garrett ringing in your ears. Your head may even start to bob up and down a bit. 

Save Wallum finalist in NSW 2024 environment awards

The Save Wallum campaign has been named as a finalist in the Nature Conservation Council of NSW Environment Awards 2024. The award ceremony will be held in Sydney tonight, and Save Wallum spokesperson and ecologist James Barrie will be attending with Tegan Kitt, another founding member of the group.

Roller derby rocks the Cavanbah Centre

The Red Kennedys have once again dominated the Northern Rivers Revolt Roller Derby Tournament held at the Cavanbah Centre over the weekend of March 16-17.

Editorial – Let’s do the development dance!

Some good questions were raised by residents at last week’s Council meeting – and were ‘taken on notice’ by Mayor, Michael Lyon.

Cudgenclearing-wp
A 300-metre stretch of Blacks Creek inside Cudgen Nature Reserve was dredged and cleared on either side ‘accidentally’ by the developer.


Luis Feliu

Two years after the Tweed’s biggest developer admitted to ‘accidentally’ clearing a huge swathe of protected bushland in the Cudgen Nature Reserve next to its massive Kings Forest township development, the state government has moved again to prosecute the company.

The NSW environment department yesterday said proceedings in the longrunning case against a Leda Group company for damaging reserve land next to its subdivision for 4,500 homes on the Tweed coast in March 2011 had begun in the NSW Land and Environment Court.

The company, Leda Management Services Pty Ltd, faces hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines for breaching the National Parks and Wildlife Act if found guilty by the court, which starts its hearing on March 22.

It comes only weeks after the planning department fined Leda a total of $6,000 for starting work at its other township development at Cobaki before obtaining approval and before appointing a principal certifying authority.

Cuts of depths up to 16 metres and filling of depths up to 10 metres were made without a construction certificate in the northern hillside portion of the 600 hectare site on the NSW-Queensland border earmarked for 5,500 homes.

Tweed Shire Council is also investigating massive unauthorised earthworks at Leda’s Cobaki site, including the bulldozing of a freshwater wetland and endangered frog habitat to build a huge gravel roadway, 400 metres long and 20 metres wide near a proposed parkway nearby.

But planners say the case depends on the outcome of a current assessment by the planning department for a proposed change to the previous ministerial approval for the site.

In a scathing attack on the developer in parliament late in 2011, Greens MP Cate Faehrmann described the ‘shocking case of illegal clearing of vegetation’ along a 300 metre stretch of Blacks Creek in the Cudgen Nature Reserve, involving dredging the creek ‘in flagrant defiance of its status as a habitat for threatened species’.

Access

Ms Faehrmann, who inspected the site after the clearing, told parliament that it was thought the developer wanted ‘the creek and the land adjacent to it excised from Cudgen Nature Reserve to provide a second access to the Kings Forest development’.

She said the billionaire property mogul Bob Ell and his Leda group had a past history of illegal clearing and used intimidation and bullying tactics against people to get their way.

She said that if guilty, Leda should be hit with ‘the most severe penalty available’ to act as a serious deterrent.

Leda claims workmen bulldozed trees and other vegetation along the creek inside the protected area by accident.

In a letter leaked to Echonetdaily late in 2011, NSW environment minister Robyn Parker revealed the National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) only learnt about the environmental destruction after Leda dobbed itself in.

She said that Leda had contacted the NPWS in July 2011 ‘to report that accidental vegetation clearing had occurred on the adjoining nature reserve’.

Former Tweed Greens councillor Henry James says the work would improve drainage in the southeast corner of Kings Forest and facilitate development in low lying areas of the 1100 hectare estate.

He unsuccessfully called for a freeze on further approvals for the development until the case was finalised, saying that assumptions about drainage and flooding and future maintenance of waterways were critical to the number of lots that could be developed.

Mr James, who at the time said it was ‘an amazing coincidence’ that Leda dobbed itself in just as the work was completed, was hit with a defamation writ from Leda after raising concerns about the removal of vegetation and the drainage of wetlands on the estate itself five years ago.

The inquiry, which led to the council’s sacking in 2005, also raised concerns about the council’s failure to take steps to stop ‘illegal clearing’ at Kings Forest.

History

In her speech to parliament on the 2011 incident, Ms Faehrmann said she noted that the former Labor government ‘also saw fit to approve the Kings Forest development despite the developer having a history of illegal vegetation clearing’.

‘On 9 November 2007 Gold Coast City Council secured orders in the Queensland Planning and Environment Court compelling companies owned by Bob Ell to revegetate land that had been illegally cleared in November and December 2006 at Pimpama, Queensland.

‘The court judged that Leda Developments Pty Ltd and Leda Developments No 2 Pty Ltd had cleared major portions of a holding of about 100 hectares without the relevant development permits from the council.

‘As well as the recorded conviction for illegal clearing, Bob Ell has a reputation for getting away with many other instances of native vegetation clearing and habitat destruction.

‘Once discovered, with legal pressure and the assistance of compliant consultants, he has managed to obtain retrospective approvals under dubious excuses and loopholes.

‘For instance, at his Cobaki Lakes holding, another mega residential development, his company Project 28 (Leda Holdings) cleared a stand of old growth scribbly gum and then had a consultant state that the trees were dangerous to human health. Council apparently accepted this claim.

‘On another occasion he excavated a section of Blacks Creek on the Kings Forest site through a state wetland claiming it was merely “drain clearing”.

‘This excuse was also apparently accepted by the council. It might help to understand why the council has accepted these claims when one knows of the tactics of intimidation and bullying employed by Ell and Leda.

Reputation

‘To give a flavour of his reputation, Anne Davies described Bob Ell as having a “reputation as a tough developer, unafraid of litigation” in an article headed “Development yields nothing but a crop of litigation” published in the Sydney Morning Herald on 8 November 2004. In the same article, Leda’s manager of residential development, Reg Van Rij, is quoted as saying that “Bob Ell has deep pockets, a stubborn personality and a litigious nature”.

‘Ell and Leda have sought to silence critics with threats of defamation. Leda recently supplied a 74 page dossier to local media with details of people they consider to be hurdles to their developments, including local ecologists and councillors.

‘The dossier has not been made public, other than by selected quotes in the Tweed Daily News of 27 October 2011. However, it is understood that some people have been targeted simply because they made submissions to public consultation processes.

‘Is this latest clearing a repeat offence? Is it an example of a developer clearing vegetation from public land with the highest level of conservation protection confident that it can persuade and intimidate the authorities into bestowing retrospective approval should they be challenged?

‘Is it another example of a developer treating the risk of litigation in Australia’s various land and environment courts as just another cost of doing business?

‘If it does transpire that this clearing is a repeat offence then the most severe penalty available should be imposed.

‘It should be a penalty that acts as a serious deterrent for a wealthy developer and not one that can be written off as just another cost of doing business.

‘I recommend that consideration be given to changing the law to ensure that developers with a history of non-compliance with planning and environment laws be precluded from further development approvals.’

Mr Ell later exercised his right of reply in parliament, challenging Ms Faehrmann’s comments.

 


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

4 COMMENTS

  1. Anyone who is found guilty of more than 1 count of illegal clearing should be jailed. That would teach them a lesson they will never forget. The environment belongs to everyone including future generations. Once cleared, native vegetation cannot easily be restored. Mandatory jail sentences are the only effective deterent for the mega rich and mega arrogant.

  2. Well if this developer has decided he can operate outside of the law with relative impunity I suggest that his punishment should also be in a form that lies way outside of the law. Lets see what happens next.

  3. Agreed, Eddy. The fact that Ell has a history of this and gets away with a slap on the wrist ($6,000 or $60,000 is nothing to a billionaire) means he will continue to clear illegally as long as he likes. A much much harsher punishment is called for, as Eddy suggests. Alternatively developers who clear illegally could be forbidden to be involved in any commercial development again (directly or as an alter ego) much like animal abusers are not allowed to own a pet in the future,

  4. Very sad behaviour outlined above, if found guilty I support the heaviest penalties apply to all offending developers. Bob Ell, your chickens may come home to roost on this. Ignorance is our most damaging action…act now with this knowledge.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

We just love him!

If you’re over 50 you might not be a fan of Tom Jones, but you can bet your mum is. If you’re under 40 you might not even know who he is, but your grandmother probably wet her pants at the mere mention of his name.

Peter Garrett gives Bluesfest the nod

If I say the words ‘US Forces give the nod’, I can pretty much guarantee that you will hear the unmistakable voice of Peter Garrett ringing in your ears. Your head may even start to bob up and down a bit. 

Save Wallum finalist in NSW 2024 environment awards

The Save Wallum campaign has been named as a finalist in the Nature Conservation Council of NSW Environment Awards 2024. The award ceremony will be held in Sydney tonight, and Save Wallum spokesperson and ecologist James Barrie will be attending with Tegan Kitt, another founding member of the group.

New report highlights gaps in rural and remote health

The second annual Royal Flying Doctor Service ‘Best for the Bush, Rural and remote Health Base Line’ report has just been released. Presenting the latest data on the health of rural and remote Australians and evidence on service gaps, it identifies issues in urgent need of attention from service providers, funders, partners and policy makers.