19.2 C
Byron Shire
October 25, 2021

Green levy ‘just a big roads tax’

Latest News

Recycling polystyrene just got easier at Lismore’s Recycling & Recovery Centre

The Lismore Recycling & Recovery Centre has a new machine that can recycle polystyrene which will help the facility increase the capacity to deal with this earth-wrecking synthetic-aromatic-hydrocarbon-polymer.

Other News

COVID-19 update: 5 new cases in the NNSWLHD

Northern NSW Local Health District, Acting Chief Executive, Lynne Weir, says there were five new cases of COVID-19 reported for the District to 8pm last night, 21 October.

Cartoon of the week – 20 October, 2021

The letters deadline for The Echo is noon Friday. Letters longer than 200 words may be cut. The publication of letters is at the discretion of the letters editor.

Government secrecy around health advice defended by local Nats MP

The NSW Liberal-Nationals government’s attempt to block transparency around its health advice with the COVID-19 outbreak in Sydney last June will now become public.

Epiq sporting facilities ready for summer

Lennox Head’s Clarence Property has just handed over to Ballina Shire Council the newly constructed Community & Sports Amenities Building, at the sports fields opposite Epiq Marketplace, off Hutley Drive.

Iona Herbs

Pam Morrow from Iona Herbs is a one-woman-show. She has spent her whole life growing herbs and produce on...

Speeding traffic

In Suffolk Park there are a number of problems including getting out of Clifford Street onto Broken Head Road...

Luis Feliu

A move to look into imposing a $14 annual ‘environmental’ levy on Tweed ratepayers has been slammed as ‘a great big roads tax’ and an attempt to discredit environmentally conscious ratepayers.

Pro-development Cr Warren Polglase’s notice of motion for Council to investigate the introduction of a one per cent special levy above the 3.4 per cent annual capped rate increase drew support from all councillors except mayor Barry Longland.

The $14.17 levy would be introduced from 2014–15 if approved, with Cr Polglase, saying it would raise half a million dollars annually to spend on maintenance around the shire and would help ‘leverage’ further state funding.

Cr Polglase admitted the move ‘may be controversial’, but said it would relieve funding pressure on the shire’s budget, especially spending on roads, which was one of the shire’s ‘biggest issues’.

‘If we can generate more funds to fix them, surely a lot of ratepayers would appreciate that,’ he told Council last Thursday.

But community watchdog group Tweed Monitor said the move was ‘both totally unwarranted and an attempt to discredit environmentally conscious ratepayers’.

Monitor spokesman Jerry Cornford said the motion ‘insulted the intelligence of ratepayers’.

‘If Cr Polglase is genuinely concerned about a potential shortfall in the roads budget, why doesn’t he just come out and call the proposed levy what it is, A Great Big Roads Tax,’ Mr Cornford said.

‘There’s absolutely no need to target by association the majority of environmentally minded ratepayers.’

Mr Cornford described the levy plan as ‘farcical’ as it would raise only $503,000 per year.

‘This is peanuts compared with the $5 million dollars council will raise in rates from the Kings Forest development and a similar amount from Cobaki Lakes,’ he said.

‘The Tweed has already endured seven years of rates in excess of the IPART (Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal) rates limit, yet with another huge input to come from the two largest new residential developments on the east coast of Australia, Cr Polglase is still crying poor.

‘Council is already maintaining its Crown lands and coastal reserves from the current rates budget, and to suggest that it needs to raise a levy just in front of an estimated $10 million rates windfall is a total nonsense.’

Cr Polglase said such a levy was already used by other NSW councils and the Tweed council should look at finding alternative funding arrangements as the current rate pegging level would not change, irrespective of which party was in government.

He said council would have to present a ‘strong case’ to IPART and a program detailing what exactly the levy funds would be spent on.

Cr Katie Milne said there were other ways to fund environmental initiatives and a levy may not be the best process.

She said funding on the environment should be incorporated ‘adequately’ in Council’s normal budget as it was in Council’s charter to do so, and questioned the use of such a levy.

A staff report on the proposal is due to be considered at council’s November meeting.

 

 

 


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

4WDs multiplying on Seven Mile Beach?

Beach users in Lennox Head are reporting much higher numbers of 4WDs on Seven Mile Beach recently, along with an increase in hooning behaviour. Since...

Julian Assange: the name that cannot be uttered

Since the news came through I have been keeping an eye and an ear out for further reporting in the mainstream media. Needless to...

NSW – bad to worse

While Gladys has left the building and we have a new religious fanatic in the top job, things are looking very grim in the...

Two views of animal welfare on the Tweed

Local MP Justine Elliot recently announced that an Albanese Labor Government will invest $1 million to build the new animal pound and rehoming centre at Lundberg Drive, South Murwillumbah.