24.8 C
Byron Shire
September 18, 2021

Fluoride debate heats up in the Tweed

Latest News

Police arrest 32 in protests across the state

Police say they have prevented the mass gathering of people in various locations across NSW, arresting 32 people and issuing 265 Penalty Infringement Notices in a coordinated and mobile response to planned protest activity.

Other News

New COVID – casual contact location – BP Chinderah Southbound

NNSWLHD has been notified of a new casual contact venue visited by a confirmed case of COVID-19 who travelled between Sydney and Brisbane for work.

Courage

Mask mandates are flawed orders that violate the human right to informed consent. Businesses that demand their customers wear...

Viruses

Viruses are organisms at the edge of life and possess genes, evolve by natural selection, and reproduce by creating...

Following the lead of Western Australia and Victoria

Following the leads of Western Australia and Victoria by adopting a plan to phase out logging of public native forests, is what a local alliance is asking of the NSW Government.

Strange strategy

The strategy applied by Byron Shire Council (BSC) since 2002 is bemusing at best. Firstly a position was created by...

Berry bright future

At 25, Sarah Montgomery has her feet planted firmly on the ground and her hands deep in the soil....

Tweed Cr Katie Milne, concerned about shire's water and fluoridation. Photo Luis Feliu
Tweed Cr Katie Milne, concerned about the shire’s water and fluoridation. Photo Luis Feliu

Luis Feliu

A bid by a Tweed councillor to debate and look into the annual costs of the shire’s current fluoridation of its drinking water supply and any savings if the practice were stopped was rejected last night.

Cr Katie Milne’s original agenda notice of motion to find out the costs and estimated savings if fluoridation were discontinued and to explore other options to replace it sparked some heated debate.

With most councillors not appearing to support her motion, the Greens councillor was forced to water it down to simply ask that media be told about the annual costs of fluoridating the shire’s water supply.

But that too was rejected 2–5 (Crs Milne and Gary Bagnall for) and replaced by an amended motion by deputy mayor Michael Armstrong and mayor Barry Longland for the costs of adding fluoride to be added to future council budgets as a line item.

That succeeded, with Cr Warren Polglase the only dissenter.

Cr Milne’s original motion had also asked for Council to report on other options that may be available for the community to receive fluoride, including methods in Europe where fluoride is added to certain brands of milk and bottled water.

She opened the debate by saying fluoride had become a ‘raging’ issue on the northern rivers and in Queensland and as one of the north coast’s biggest councils it was ‘incumbent’ on it to inform the community of the facts, as requested of her by some in the community.

She said the state health minister had recently advised that councils could not discontinue the practice of fluoridation once started.

But it was important, Cr Milne said, for other north coast councils currently considering adding fluoride that, once they had done so, there was ‘no turning back’.

She said the Tweed also had to be involved in the overall discussion about the issue.

But Cr Armstrong said he had ‘grave concerns’ about the motion as it stood because it was ‘misleading’ the community by ‘suggesting savings could be made if fluoride were discontinued, which was contrary to state legislation’.

‘Why tell the community there could be a saving when we just can’t do it?’ he said.

Cr Phil Youngblutt agreed, saying fluoridation was about stopping dental decay, which experts agreed was the case, and that ‘a very small minority of people was prepared to stop it, like the vaccination issue, by making out there were problems with it’.

Cr Polglase said the motion was ‘out of order’ because it would ‘misrepresent’ Council as ‘fluoridation already exists and no savings can therefore be made’.

Cr Milne then agreed to  amend her motion to remove the term ‘savings’, but Cr Armstrong said it did the same thing ‘by implication that there could be some change’.

Cr Milne said she failed to see his argument, and that Council was ‘not at the stage of lobbying the minister’, which would be ‘far more controversial’.

‘It’s just a fact-finding, information exercise, and it would be proper for a media statement to be issued on this. I know what the costs are, but the community should be told,’ she said.

‘I can’t see how it could lead someone to think we want to get rid of it, but the community has the right to know, so it can have an informed debate; it’s about providing proper transparency.’

Cr Carolyn Byrne said the costs could be addressed by ‘a simple question on notice’ and that the ‘underlying intent’ of Cr Milne’s motion was to ‘stimulate or aggravate debate on fluoride and Tweed shire’s position on it’.

‘We accepted it 30 years ago and we’re not in a position to change it,’ Cr Byrne said.

The amendment by Cr Armstrong to add the cost as a line item in future budgets was then debated briefly and passed 6–1 (Cr Polglase against).


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

2 COMMENTS

  1. I don’t live in the Tweed, but I appreciate and applaud Cr Milne’s efforts. I think it’s a very sick and sad society when individuals, governments and corporations stick to the status quo and remain unprepared to even consider other options in the light of changing understanding and practices elsewhere. From my perspective, the very fact that there is opposition to fluoridation indicates that there is a need for constant re-evaluation of its worth, not to mention a need for the supplementation of the diet with fluoride to be optional. I am not opposed to fluoride supplementation for those who want it, but it should not be forced upon us all. Selling fluoridated products such as salt or milk is a far better option than fluoridation.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

COVID update – sewage detection in East and South Lismore and Byron Bay

Northern NSW Local Health District is urging people in the Lismore City and Byron Bay areas to get tested for COVID-19, after fragments of the virus were detected in samples from the East Lismore, South Lismore and Byron Bay sewage treatment plants.

The old slouch hat

‘This is my favourite,’ we say espite the painfully obvious fact that we all, from time to time enjoy a wide variety of hats. Jon Summers, Suffolk Park

The year 2000

I must answer David Heilpern. Remember 2000, how the computers were all to fail on NYE? How could so many get it so wrong? Why...

Viruses

Viruses are organisms at the edge of life and possess genes, evolve by natural selection, and reproduce by creating multiple copies of themselves through...