23.3 C
Byron Shire
February 24, 2024

Over-supply of grog ‘fuels violence’ in Byron

Latest News

Lighthouse Road

The section from the bus stop on Lighthouse Road to the divide of the road to Byron Bay, is...

Other News

Affordable housing summit next week

As the affordable housing issue shows no signs of easing in the near future, key figures in the housing, property, and finance sectors will come together to tackle the country’s housing challenges at the ninth Affordable Housing Development & Investment Summit

Tried catching a bus to TAFE or work in the Northern Rivers – it’s a serious challange

Getting around the Northern Rivers is no easy task without your own transport. Young people are unable to attend TAFE, and you can’t catch public transport to work due to the impossible timing of, and lack of access to, public transport. 

Naked rally in Byron as gov’t agency calls time on ‘nude’ beach

Around 150 people rallied in support of a clothing-optional section of beach in the Byron Shire on Sunday, many of them nude.

Interview with Hayley Grace

Hayley Grace’s response to post-flood PTSD, was to look at life and healing in a different way, then come through the other side writing about it – her new single ‘Mary Jane’ is the result. Hayley and The Bay Collective, a raucous seven-piece big band – featuring a full horn section, guitar, bass, keys and percussion – will launch the song this week and play some shows to get it out there. Seven spoke to Hayley on the weekend to get her POV on The Bay Collective and recovery.

Koala chlamydia and Wildlife Hospital funding boost for Northern Rivers

As the pressure mounts from the NSW Labor state government to increase the amount and density of housing, and as a result increase the population, across the Northern Rivers the impact on wildlife will continue to grow. 

‘Mandatory’ pesticide spraying deferred at Bruns pod village

Flood-affected residents have had a last-minute reprieve by the NSW Reconstruction Authority, who had planned to spray controversial pesticides at the Bruns pod village.

Tweed-Byron police commander Detective Superintendent Stuart Wilkins told this week's parliamentary committee hearing that alcohol-fuelled assaults in Byron Bay had increased in the past two months. Photo Eve Jeffrey
Tweed-Byron police commander Detective Superintendent Stuart Wilkins told this week’s parliamentary committee hearing that alcohol-fuelled assaults in Byron Bay had increased in the past two months. Photo Eve Jeffrey

Comment by Tony Brown*

The commendable efforts of the ever-growing and increasingly popular Last Drinks at 12 campaign initiated in Byron Bay are reflective of Gandhi, who was equally committed to peace and a fundamental right of self-determination

‘First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win.’

Last Drinks at 12 wrote to Ballina MP Don Page and liquor and gaming minister George Souris on 3 October seeking to be genuinely included in the liquor-industry dominated process to review the expiry of the six-month trial of the Office of Liquor, Gaming and Racing (OLGR) voluntary liquor-licence conditions in Byron and consideration of any new effective conditions.

Mr Page promptly responded with the news that without any community consultation, the trial of voluntary conditions had been extended and new (undisclosed) conditions would be introduced.

This is an extremely disappointing outcome particularly when you consider two key objectives of the NSW Liquor Act relate to ensuring all outcomes reflect the ‘aspirations’ and ‘expectations’ of the community and harm minimisation.

These sentiments are captured in Last Drinks at 12’s excellent community charter on their website.

Mr Page attended 12’s packed community forum on 24 August and would have obtained a sound and unbiased appreciation of the true substance and depth of the genuine and, importantly, well-informed groundswell of local community opposition to the intolerable and indefensible levels of alcohol-related harms in Byron and the immediately available, proven cost-saving measures to prevent the same.

(See https://www.echo.net.au/2013/08/tackling-byrons-alcohol-problem/.)

The Byron community, Byron Shire Council, nurses, doctors and police have good cause to question why the NSW government and OLGR continue to allow just five or six late-trading premises and the powerful AHA to be calling all the shots to the total exclusion and ignorance of any alternative and legitimate community views.

Byron mayor Simon Richardson has attempted to ‘ridicule’ 12 supporters as ‘wowsers’. This is particularly offensive to those whose occupations are actually saving young people’s lives inflicted with primarily preventable critical injuries arising from the dangerous over-supply of alcohol and clearly failed RSA.

(See http://au.news.yahoo.com/today-tonight/lifestyle/article/-/19139591/alochol-abuse/.)

Smoke and mirrors

Last Drinks at 12 supporters should not be distracted or deterred by the array of crude to sophisticated smoke and mirrors deployed by the liquor industry and its political acolytes now they have started to ‘fight’ you.

Byron United continues to falsely assert the Byron voluntary OLGR conditions are ‘stringent’ and completely misrepresents the internationally successful 2008 Newcastle mandatory conditions (imposing a modest reduction in late closing times) as only applying on weekends.

The Newcastle community and business generally is now celebrating the success of the modest reduction in hours with more licensed premises than five years ago, more money being spent in a more diverse range of premises and much safer streets and businesses attracting a more sustainable broader customer base.

Across NSW, in part reaction to the success of groups like 12, we are witnessing an apparent orchestrated attempt by the AHA, Clubs NSW and the NSW government of mutual self-congratulatory praise of the so-called ‘toughness’ of the government’s costly alcohol measures and the ‘cooperation’ of the industry.

This also includes ganging up on small ‘rogue’ operators like La La Land who aren’t AHA members and the very dubious use of notoriously volatile short-term crime statistics subjected to wild climatic variations to vindicate the effectiveness of their ultimately unsustainable costly band-aid ‘solutions’ like more police, transport, CCTV, lighting and voluntary curfews.

Unsurprisingly, these measures do not adversely impact on the industry’s free flow (read profits) and promotion of grog to binge drinkers or the sale of bottleshop alcohol for preloading, cheaper than some bottled water.

Assaults have increased

The latest assertion by the Byron Bay Liquor Accord that assaults have fallen by 25 per cent ignores the bad weather at the beginning of the period and the more recent concerning increase in assaults raised by police.

The Liquor Accord is not fair dinkum. When the monthly alcohol-related assault statistics fall, they take all the credit, their voluntary measures are working.

But when the monthly statistics increase, it is all because of the ‘weather’ or an ‘influx of more tourists’.

These statistics do not capture the majority of ‘unintended’ alcohol-related injuries/accidents not directly related to crime or that only around 25 per cent of assaults are reported to police.

What OLGR, AHA, the Liquor Accord, Byron United and even the police refuse to answer is why the NSW public and Byron ratepayers, and not the liquor industry, have to pay (without any input) the very high price of these above reactive measures and harm recently estimated in NSW to be around $4 billion a year in total social costs?

(See https://www.echo.net.au/2013/10/counting-the-cost-of-grog-culture-2/ and https://www.echo.net.au/2013/10/alcohol-inquiry/.)

Unlike 12, none in the powerful liquor lobby has been able to produce any independent peer review research establishing the cost effectiveness of their preferred controls including lockouts/curfews alone and CCTV in preventing alcohol-related harms.

Byron Council has organised a round-table meeting of all local stakeholders for this Monday, 14 October.

More ‘tinkering at the edges’ with additional ‘voluntary’ unenforceable conditions – such as ceasing the service half an hour early, a 1am curfew, and no alcohol takeaways after 10pm – makes good sound grabs, but is no real substitute for immediately enforceable precinct-wide reductions in the late over-supply of grog.

This is proven to disproportionately reduce alcohol-related harms while being better for more responsible businesses not reliant upon dangerously ‘loading up’ volatile binge drinkers.

The ‘fight’ is not over, but for the sake of Byron, our youth and international tourism reputation, as a safe and inviting destination, 12 will ‘win’ with its extensive community interest, collaboration and common sense.

*Tony Brown voluntarily led and represented Newcastle residents and small businesses in the instigation of stricter licensing conditions for that city.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

3 COMMENTS

  1. Congratulations. Spot on. It is crystal clear from research done in Australia and all over the world that the most important factors in alcohol-related problems are: (i) the price of alcohol; and (ii) the availability of alcohol. The community experiences more alcohol problems if alcohol is too cheap and too available and less alcohol-related problems if alcohol costs a little bit more and is a little harder to get. We have to remember that the heaviest drinking 10% of drinkers consume 50% of the alcohol consumed in a community and the the heaviest drinking 20% of drinkers consume 70% of the alcohol. It is also this 10% (or 20%) who make the drinks industry so profitable. When in government, both sides of politics put the interests of the drinks industry ahead of the interests of the community. If the community wants their interests put ahead of the interests of the drinks industry then they have to make their views better known and demand fewer outlets and less liberal conditions for their outlets. The NSW government should demand of the Commonwealth that health is taken into account when setting alcohol tax. It’s not really that complicated.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

4,000 failed

I attended the flood forum held at the Ballina RSL last Monday and was aghast to hear some of the facts presented. 4,000 people...

Knitting Nannas get behind Save Wallum campaign

With porcelain tea cups, lace-covered tables and plenty of knitting the Knitting Nannas Against Greed (KNAG) headed to the basecamp of the Save Wallum...

NPWS wants to remove beach nudity option

For 26 years, Tyagarah Beach has been an oasis for the region’s naturist community – a space where bodies of all shapes and sizes could roam free without threat of fines or reprimands.

‘Key workers’ removed from Ballina Council’s housing project as Mayor seeks full market rents

Essential workers were the losers at the recent Ballina Council meeting when councillors actively removed the category for ‘key workers’ from their development of rental housing on land it owns in Wollongbar.