Govt wants councils to warn buyers of costal hazards

Coastal erosion, such as this at Belongil, is causing headaches for home-owners and councils alike. Photo Jeff Dawson

Coastal erosion, such as this at Belongil, is causing headaches for home-owners and councils alike. Photo Jeff Dawson

The state government says it plans to ensure that coastal property buyers are given clear and accurate advice by local councils on the impacts of coastal hazards such as erosion and flooding.

The move comes as local councils, including Byron and Tweed shires, struggle with whether to create rock walls to protect private property or maintain longstanding policies of ‘managed retreat’ in areas subject to erosion.

In 2012 Tweed Shire Council voted to build a revetment wall on Kingscliff beach to protect the surf club and caravan park, leading to resident accusations later that the wall was merely moving the problem.

Last year, Byron Shire Council voted to replace an ageing council sandbag wall at Belongil beach, adjacent to million-dollar homes, with a ‘temporary’ rock wall that critics say would cost more to remove than to put in place.

Today planning and infrastructure minister Brad Hazzard will put on public exhibition a draft planning circular recommending that councils distinguish between current and future hazards on Section 149 certificates.

Section 149 certificates alert purchasers to risks on the land, which can restrict development, such as whether building is subject to flood-related development controls.

‘We want to ensure property owners and buyers are given clear, accurate and up-to-date information on coastal hazards,’ Mr Hazzard said.

‘It is sensible to clearly separate current and future hazards.

‘Councils need to make that decision based on sufficiently accurate and complete information that is as reliable as possible and is not broad brush, but which takes into account relevant information about local conditions.

‘What this planning circular delivers is certainty – certainty and consistency for councils, property owners and property buyers.’

The new planning circular follows advice to the NSW government from the NSW chief scientist and engineer, who in turn took advice from leading experts in sea-level rise, CSIRO’s Dr John Church and Dr John Hunter from the Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre.

The Coastal Expert Panel has also provided advice to the NSW government to help refine its approach.

Mr Hazzard said the government had adopted the chief scientist’s recommendation that more regionally specific calculations be carried out, which took into account specific sea level, topography, flood risk and other conditions along the NSW coast.

‘The chief scientist rightly pointed out that NSW has the expertise – government, academia and research institutions and the private sector that allows global models to be interpreted and adapted to build much more precise local models specific to various NSW coastal locations.

‘Following the chief scientist’s review, the NSW government is also considering the best and most suitable way to provide technical support for local councils in interpreting and translating new scientific findings, and assist them in developing strategies, infrastructure planning, and appropriate risk management related to sea-level rise and its impacts.’

Local government minister and Ballina MP Don Page said councils wanted simpler and clearer information on current and future coastal hazards in the face of complex and inconsistent scientific data.

‘For landowners there has been uncertainty along the coast, with different councils applying different approaches to the way they determined notations on Section 149 certificates.

‘The proposed circular delivers clarity to all coastal councils by making a clear distinction between current and future exposure to coastal hazards, which could be very different in nature and require different management controls.

‘The NSW government is returning power to local communities who have been affected by Labor’s heavy-handed coastal policy.

‘The government has already made it easier for landowners to place large sandbags on beaches as temporary coastal protection works during storms.’

Minister for the environment Robyn Parker said the Coastal Expert Panel is ‘working with the NSW government on practical advice to assist councils in their assessments’.

‘Managing erosion and other coastal hazards is a complex and challenging task – we want NSW to have the best plans, legislation and other arrangements in place to manage our valuable coastal areas,’ Minister Parker said.

The draft planning circular is on public exhibition and submissions can be made until 3 March 2014.

2 responses to “Govt wants councils to warn buyers of costal hazards”

  1. Navhal Pols says:

    What absolute bolderdash! the “solution” is so simple and costs absolutely nothing. DO NOT BUILD CLOSE TO THE COAST, simple, problem solved.

  2. Ivan Ransom says:

    Building on frontal dunes should be totally banned. There has never been a right to build just anywhere, particularly when this selfishness potentially culminates in emotional blackmail to rescue the residences of home-owners who may have been lied to or deceived by developers. For local government it is a simple proposition: 1: Ban building by the sea-side. 2. Prosecute those who sell such property. Councils should not have to bear the costs of wilfully irresponsible people. It would be cheaper in the long run to resume threatened properties than to play King Canute.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Become a supporter of The Echo

A note from the editorial team

Some of The Echo’s editorial team: journalists Paul Bibby and Aslan Shand, editor Hans Lovejoy, photographer Jeff Dawson and Mandy Nolan

The Echo has never underestimated the intelligence and passion of its readers. In a world of corporate banality and predictability, The Echo has worked hard for more than 30 years to help keep Byron and the north coast unique with quality local journalism and creative ideas. We think this area needs more voices, reasoned analysis and ideas than just those provided by News Corp, lifestyle mags, Facebook groups and corporate newsletters.

The Echo is one hundred per cent locally owned and one hundred per cent independent. As you have probably gathered from what is happening in the media industry, it is not cheap to produce a weekly newspaper and a daily online news service of any quality.

We have always relied entirely on advertising to fund our operations, but often loyal readers who value our local, independent journalism have asked how they could help ensure our survival.

Any support you can provide to The Echo will make an enormous difference. You can make a one-off contribution or a monthly one. With your help, we can continue to support a better informed local community and a healthier democracy for another 30 years.”

Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers.