Menu

PM ‘short-sighted’ on national parks

Sunrise at Warrumbungle National Park. Image R Scott/DECC, from ‪environment.nsw.gov.au

Sunrise at Warrumbungle National Park. Image R Scott/DECC, from ‪environment.nsw.gov.au

The National Parks Australia Council (NPAC) says it is extremely concerned that PM Tony Abbott ‘so readily disregards the true value of national parks’.

The NPAC was responding to Mr Abbott’s comments to a timber industry dinner in Canberra last Tuesday that. ‘We have quite enough national parks. We have quite enough locked up forests already. In fact, in an important respect, we have too much locked-up forest.’

NPAC president Michelle Prior said, ‘While occupying less than eight per cent of Australia, national parks are a major drawcard in the annual $23 billion nature-based tourism industry.

‘As evidenced by substantial research, access to the natural environment also contributes significantly to health and wellbeing.

‘National parks are critical to conserving our unique biodiversity, and in fact, appear to be the only effective strategy in saving the 70per cent of Australia’s threatened species in decline.

‘Additionally, national parks deliver other services, such as protection of urban water catchments and climate amelioration.’

CEO of the National Parks Association of NSW Kevin Evans said, ‘Australia’s national parks are not only a national achievement, but a legacy for the future. The majority of Australians citizens value and appreciate national parks.

‘Unfortunately, the prime minister is out of touch with contemporary opinions and knowledge.

‘National Parks are not “locked up” – they have the most generous form of land tenure available, being publicly available to all.

‘However, since inception, national parks have experienced competition from economic interests, and [are] sought after as highly prized public lands for private gain.

‘National parks are the last bastion for conservation. However, these critically important areas, have recently been beleaguered by an extensive variety of external threats – grazing, logging, tourism construction, hunting, prospecting, motorised recreation.

‘In particular, national parks are increasingly coming under attack from the governments that created them in the first place.’


3 responses to “PM ‘short-sighted’ on national parks”

  1. Trevor Kirk says:

    What’s next? Razing historic homes, public sculpture, art galleries and other edifices for home unit development? Don’t vote LNP or Labo(U)r at either a State or Federal level. They are both as bad as each other. Politics in Oz has gone to the dogs. Ahaa! That’s it! Let’s form the Oz Dogcatcher Party and get rid of the rough metal files we call pollies. Nah! Just vote for another party of your choice. But don’t waste you say by not voting at all. We must keep Australia democratic forever.

  2. Navhal Pols says:

    Exactly the same remarks were made on Howard, Rudd and Gillard which proves that it is not they themselves but on orders of the corporations. What government, it does not exist.
    Apropos, I am not a fan of Abbott I feel sorry for him to be a puppet.

  3. Allan Lugg says:

    ‘In particular, national parks are increasingly coming under attack from the governments that created them in the first place.’ And you should ask yourself why?

    Part of the reason could well be that National Park managers have been far too unwilling to countenance activities that pose little if any risk to the inherent values of the parks they are managing and in the process have alienated large sections of the community – hunters, fishers, dog walkers, adjacent farmers, campers, Four wheel drivers etc etc.

    For many people National Parks have become synonymous with over-the-top restriction – you can’t camp here, you can’t walk there, you can’t light a fire there, you can’t pick that flower (even though it is a weed), you can’t have that dog, you can’t fish in that spot, you can’t shoot that animal (even though it is a pest), no we won’t build a fence to stop the kangaroos invading your farm……………….

    When National Park’s managers and supporters get a little more realistic about focussing on the factors that really pose a risk to biodiversity and the values of the Parks and embrace the concept of multiple use just a little bit, they might just find that the wider community and politicians are a little less antagonistic towards them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Become a supporter of The Echo

A note from the editorial team

Some of The Echo’s editorial team: journalists Paul Bibby and Aslan Shand, editor Hans Lovejoy, photographer Jeff Dawson and Mandy Nolan

The Echo has never underestimated the intelligence and passion of its readers. In a world of corporate banality and predictability, The Echo has worked hard for more than 30 years to help keep Byron and the north coast unique with quality local journalism and creative ideas. We think this area needs more voices, reasoned analysis and ideas than just those provided by News Corp, lifestyle mags, Facebook groups and corporate newsletters.

The Echo is one hundred per cent locally owned and one hundred per cent independent. As you have probably gathered from what is happening in the media industry, it is not cheap to produce a weekly newspaper and a daily online news service of any quality.

We have always relied entirely on advertising to fund our operations, but often loyal readers who value our local, independent journalism have asked how they could help ensure our survival.

Any support you can provide to The Echo will make an enormous difference. You can make a one-off contribution or a monthly one. With your help, we can continue to support a better informed local community and a healthier democracy for another 30 years.”

Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers and is brought to you by this week's sponsor Vast Ballina and Falls Festival