Menu

West Byron development proposal referred to ICAC

Sunday’s Byron Markets saw a pop-up protest against the 108-hectare development proposal. Photo Sean O’Shea

Sunday’s Byron Markets saw a pop-up protest against the 108-hectare development proposal. Photo Sean O’Shea

Hans Lovejoy

The West Byron development proposal is to be referred to the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) today (Tuesday) by NSW Greens MLC and former Byron mayor Jan Barham.

Ms Barham told The Echo that the site ‘may have been wrongly defined’ and is worthy of investigation. ‘The community deserves to be assured that a project of this scale has not been brought forward for state approval wrongly.’

‘I believe that it is important that this matter is clarified before any assessment of the proposal by the government,’ she said.

The 108-hectare land is currently under planning minister Pru Goward’s determination for large-scale housing/industrial development, and sits just 2.5 kilometres west of the CBD on Ewingsdale Road. The Echo understands that Sydney-based developer Terry Agnew is by far the largest shareholder at around 80 per cent, along with other local investors.

Ms Barham says there appears to be ‘irregularities’ from when the site was defined in 2009 as West Byron Bay Urban Release Area for inclusion in the Major Development SEPP.

It comes after a meeting was held between Ms Barham, local state MP Don Page (Nationals) and members from the Byron Residents Group last week.

MP Don Page’s position

Mr Page told The Echo, ‘We discussed the full range of issues ie koalas, traffic, population projections, acid sulfate soils, vegetation, environment zones etc. They supplied additional information on koalas. We also discussed the meeting they had with the minister.’

When The Echo asked Mr Page if he would support Ms Barham’s inquiry, he said, ‘I believe the inquiry Jan is talking about relates to matters that may have taken place back in 2009 when the rezoning went to the then-state [Labor] government. I don’t have any knowledge on those matters.’

But Mr Page stated his position on the contentious development, and supplied The Echo with his recent template letter for those concerned with the proposal. It says the rezoning proposal raises several issues.

He writes, ‘These include traffic congestion, environmental issues including vegetation, koalas and acid sulfate soils; and potential flooding.’

Mr Page claims that while those who have contacted him regarding West Byron have been both for and against the development, he says he ‘has made it plain that I could not support the proposed rezoning unless current traffic congestion problems were being addressed.’

‘I’ve also indicated that those sections of the proposal that are environmentally sensitive (approximately 40 per cent of the site) should be rezoned either E2 or E3, and that a koala management plan, a vegetation management plan and an acid sulfate soils plan would need to be put in place before any development occurs.’

West Byron history

Ms Barham said that ‘The West Byron Bay Urban Release Area proposal had been rejected by Byron Shire Council for inclusion in the new Local Environment Plan (LEP), but the applicants then made representations to the state government.

‘At the time, the state government had changed the planning rules to allow applicants to go directly to the state for consideration of proposals.

‘The Major Development – State Environmental Planning Policy (SEPP) – under Schedule 3, provided for residential developments if they were determined by the minister to be ‘important in achieving state or regional planning objectives’ to then proceed to a state-based assessment, rather than consideration by local government.

‘While the area of West Byron was included in the Far North Coast (FNC) Regional Strategy, it was done so on the basis of robust and comprehensive assessments of the site over the previous decade.

‘The inclusion of the lands in the strategy to meet the defined dwelling targets had already been assessed and the scale of the development potential of the site was limited to approximately 230 dwellings but still required further investigation,’ said Ms Barham.

‘It is clear from the council records from 2006 that the required dwelling target of 2,600 for the next 25 years for the shire under the FNC Regional Strategy was to be made up of predominantly infill development with planning defined for 1,300 single dwellings and 1,300 multi-unit dwelling and that this was ‘generally in accordance with Council’s existing settlement strategies.

‘With community outrage over the current proposal, and the fact that the scale and impacts would change the character of Byron Bay forever, I felt it was necessary to back track and check the history.

‘I have also made GIPA [freedom of information] applications to seek information regarding the lobbying that may have taken place regarding this proposal.’

BRG offensive

Meanwhile, the Byron Residents Group continue their public relations offensive with the proposal and have claimed the website domain www.westbyron.org.

The home page is an open letter which calls on the landowners to reassess the development. Hundreds of names – many from Byron Bay – accompany the letter as signatories.


5 responses to “West Byron development proposal referred to ICAC”

  1. Odette Nightsky says:

    Good. The last thing we need is more city folk blowing in and the locals not being able to live anywhere. Cause all this redevelopment does not have the locals or habitat for creatures in mind at all.

  2. Jan Barham is fantastic! Love her!

  3. It’s really not a matter of “blow ins”….we all “blew in” sometime after all. But I personally feel the type of major development proposed is not appropriate. That land has suffered enough already. Even a lay man or woman can see the estuary is suffering from what has gone on upstream already. Enough already I say! Let us do our developments in smaller increments.

    • rob harris says:

      obviously would need to sort out traffic and environmaental issues , however bout time byron developed some more land, take some of the pressure off tweed and ballina who where land seems to being developed at an increasing rate.perhaps the developer contributions will help council to develop infrastructure in byron.eg road bypass

  4. david saunders says:

    Byron bay is a very special place, theres no doubting the fact, that is why it is so so popular with visitors.
    There are many environmental reasons .One which I havnt heard much about which is -much of west byron land is a flood water storage area after cyclones and the regular heavy weather we have here. If the land is raised with fill as proposed the flood waters will find there way to the lowest point which is Johnson st Byron, sure water will escape via the Belongil creek to sea, but that can be uncertain as the Belongil usually needs bulldozers to open the estuary at the sea during prolonged extreme weather events, at times the dozer cant get in to open the estuary due to huge seas so the Belongil quickly fills.
    Without an exit for the water that now lays around west byron then slowly disipates over weeks the flood waters will as has happened in the past after I think 2 cyclones in a row will run down hill in the town drain which is next to railway park and flood Johnson st. The clock tower is im pretty sure just below sea level. We have seen this area flooded before due to this but will be much worse if the west byron flood water natural storage area cant store the water if its filled. West byron if developed will flood also even with in fill.
    The point that I started writing about is Byrons major draw card may be that we are the most easterly point but as a 30 year active resident I know visitors are coming to visit as Byron is an alternative to the now crowded towns of Tweed and Balina as examples, Byron shire is a jewel of the country and world for its un bound beauty, low development and soul healing including arts, music the alternative folk etc etc etc.
    We have protected this town so far from becoming another generic tourist destination.
    Can we keep beatifull places like Byron shire for visitors and not kill the goose and steal the gold egg.
    Think of the future. We all know that extractive industries are only going to last another 40 years or so then we need tourism in AU so lets all look forward and say no to quick money merchants.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Become a supporter of The Echo

A note from the editorial team

Some of The Echo’s editorial team: journalists Paul Bibby and Aslan Shand, editor Hans Lovejoy, photographer Jeff Dawson and Mandy Nolan

The Echo has never underestimated the intelligence and passion of its readers. In a world of corporate banality and predictability, The Echo has worked hard for more than 30 years to help keep Byron and the north coast unique with quality local journalism and creative ideas. We think this area needs more voices, reasoned analysis and ideas than just those provided by News Corp, lifestyle mags, Facebook groups and corporate newsletters.

The Echo is one hundred per cent locally owned and one hundred per cent independent. As you have probably gathered from what is happening in the media industry, it is not cheap to produce a weekly newspaper and a daily online news service of any quality.

We have always relied entirely on advertising to fund our operations, but often loyal readers who value our local, independent journalism have asked how they could help ensure our survival.

Any support you can provide to The Echo will make an enormous difference. You can make a one-off contribution or a monthly one. With your help, we can continue to support a better informed local community and a healthier democracy for another 30 years.”

Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers and is brought to you by this week's sponsors Vast Furniture & Homewares Ballina and Falls Festival Byron Bay.