14.5 C
Byron Shire
April 15, 2021

Thus Spake Mungo: blitzkrieg on public health care

Latest News

SCU celebrates alumni achievements with awards

A group of Southern Cross University graduates who have made extraordinary global achievements in research, community building, healthcare and environmental issues have been acknowledged with the 2020 Alumni Impact Awards.

Other News

Interview with Mitch King from Dream Bigger

Dream Bigger is presenting Lismore Youth Festival in partnership with numerous organisations in Lismore. Dream Bigger connects established artists with potential future artists to make their ideas a reality through engaging workshops and collaboration. The Echo spoke to Mitch King from Dream Bigger.

New film celebrates getting back outside

'Free From Lockdown: Back Out in Nature' is a new short film in which a group of disabled and non-disabled performers from the Northern Rivers celebrate being in nature after COVID lockdown.

Mullum’s lilac house the subject of Change.org petition

The plight of a Mullum resident has touched the hearts and injustice buttons of people far and wide who feel that a requirement that she repaint her house a heritage colour and possibly pay a fine, not only ridiculous but also petty.

My own pandemic imaginations

Robert Podhajsky, Ocean Shores Imagination is a powerful mechanism; I must admit I get unsettled with my own pandemic imaginations...

Linen SHIFT project urgently needs new home

With a vision to disrupt the cycle of women’s homelessness, the Linen SHIFT project was born to provide unique individual support and education for at-risk women in a safe residential environment, but today they they have been forced to close.

Maybe Canberra needs a bit of distraction biff

Mick breathed in but his Cronulla Sharks football jersey struggled to contain his well-insulated six-pack and he held up his hand as he approached Bazza in the front bar of the Top Pub.

By Mungo MacCallum

One of the more irritating aspects of our frequently exasperating prime minister is that even when he does a back flip, he doesn’t do it properly.

There is never an apology, or a retraction: he was always right and now he’s still right. It was a good policy, now it’s a better policy. You should have been happy before, and now you ought to be delirious. But of the punters are not convinced.

Of course, there are times when Tony Abbott won’t admit there is even an issue in spite of overwhelming evidence. Take, for instance, the ludicrous and hypocritical suggestion that the problems in his office stem not from the obsessive and dictatorial arrogance of his chief of staff, but from the sexism and misogyny of his colleagues. Those of them who have had a gutfull of Abbott’s enforcer, whether her name is Peta, Peter, Lucrezia Borgia or Genghis Khan, are not impressed.

And even when he moves to assuage or counter public criticism, he can’t bring himself to offer more than a token. Julie Bishop’s belated announcement of the $200 million to the World Climate Fund – the despised Bob Brown Bank, masquerading as environmentalism under the guise of socialism – is better than nothing, but not much.

Even Abbott’s fellow recalcitrant, Canadian Stephen Harper, has kicked in half as much again, while Japan’s contribution was a full billion and without strings attached: Australia will pay its instalments over four years, if it makes the payments. And it will not be new money anyway: Abbott will raid the already depleted foreign aid budget, something Bishop had vowed never to do. Another public slapdown from the prime minister to his loyal deputy.

But by far the important tergiversation of the week is the apparent ditching of the $7 GP tax in favour of its replacement. This is not only serious, but downright sinister. The headline good news is that pensioners, children and concession cards holders will be spared, which comes as a welcome relief to much of the neediest section of the population. But the far more ominous bad news is that the changes will, if passed, be the most determined and far-reaching attack on the Medicare system ever contemplated other than downright abolition.

To explain, we need to go back to the long and fraught history of our much-loved universal health-care scheme. When, nearly 50 years ago, doctors Richard Scotton and John Deeble provided Gough Whitlam with what was then Medibank, their peculiar genius was the idea of bulk billing.

The determinedly independent body of Australian medicos would not submit to any concept of what they called socialised medicine, so they did not get it: they were allowed to continue to set their own fees at their own levels. But there was a sweetener; after consulting the profession, Medibank set up a schedule which would determine the Commonwealth government-funded rebates which would apply for the appointments and procedures.

The individual doctors could charge what they liked, but any gaps they demanded they would have to bill for themselves, involving their own bookkeeping. But if they chose to stick with the rebates, there was virtually no paperwork: patients would sign a form assigning their payments to Medibank and Medibank would send the proceeds to the medicos’ accounts – a big saving in time and money.

The specialists were not interested; they demanded real money, and much of their income came not from the Commonwealth but from the states, through the public hospital networks. The Medibank rebate was a welcome bonus, but that was all. But a great many GPs, after some initial resistance, came round to the idea of a guaranteed minimum income without the need to burden a secretary or a receptionist to double up as an accountant. And so bulk billing became the core of Medibank, and, when it was reformed and rejigged by the government of Bob Hawke, of Medicare.

As time went on, the Medicare levy of 1.5 per cent rose to 2 per cent (with a surcharge for high income earners without private health insurance) but it was not sufficient to secure the rising health budget. Hawke tinkered with the idea of a co-payment, but was rebuffed by his colleagues and by the GPs themselves, who had settled very comfortably into the longstanding regime. It took another generation for Abbott to revive the idea.

Obviously it was wildly unpopular with the public, and it was attacked by Labor and many others as an attack on the whole idea of universal Medicare. It was, but at least the co-payment was up front: the patients had to cough up their $7, which the medicos then handed over to consolidated revenue under the guise of a research fund. It would be expensive and time-consuming, but it was, in its own way, straightforward.

However the new version, even though the amount of the impost is to be reduced, is underhand, mean and sneaky. Instead of a co-payment from the patient, there is to be a deduction in the rebate from the doctor. The government is still to get the loot, but the doctor is faced with the choice of collecting it from the patient, or simply forgoing the income. Thus the GP will have to select whom and when to charge the $5 (or a part of it) and go through the unpleasant task of getting it, processing it, and banking it him- or herself.

The frustration and resentment will fester on both sides. And in the end, a lot of doctors will decide that it simply isn’t worth it: they may as well forget bulk billing altogether and go back to a system of user pays, where they can charge their own fees, which will, because of the extra expense involved, inevitably go up.

The Liberals have never liked the idea of Medicare and public health; now they have devised, under the façade of a compromise, an insidious and possibly fatal attack on it. This is not barnacle removable – it is blitzkrieg. It is to be hoped that the senate will have the perspicacity and determination to hold the line and protect what has been acknowledged as the Whitlam government’s greatest and most enduring legacy.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

1 COMMENT

  1. A small co payment would be a nuisance but would not destroy the basic function of Medicare. But gradual erosion of rebates to the doctor has the potential of undermining the whole concept of medicare.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Red Cross offers additional bushfire grants

Australian Red Cross is opening a final round of support grants for people affected by the bushfires who are suffering extreme financial hardship.

The return of the prodigal son

Gallery DownTown, the annexe of Tweed Regional Gallery, is presenting a new exhibition by regional artists.

Rotary Downunder Baton handed over at Byron Bay

The Rotary Club of Byron Bay recently took the Rotary Downunder Baton to the most easterly point of Australia as part of its national journey. As well as being the national celebration of one hundred years of service by Rotary in Australia, the theme for the centenary is 'Rotary says no to domestic violence'.

Interview with Jean Kittson

Comedian, writer, and social commentator Jean Kittson has the ability to distil complex ideas into commonsense. Jean is one of the national treasures in conversation with Mandy Nolan and Fiona O’Loughlin at No Eggs for Breakfast, a comedic chat themed around life beyond fertility! It seemed remiss not to ask Ms Kittson on her take on the debacle that is federal politics and gender equity.