Byron’s ‘two lanes in’ plan rams through

Jonson Street roundabout, a notorious pinch-point at the entrance to Byron Bay.

Jonson Street roundabout, a notorious pinch-point at the entrance to Byron Bay will become to-lanes eastbound as a result of Byron Shire Council’s decision.

Hans Lovejoy

The pro-development majority of Byron Shire Councillors again pushed ahead with plans at Thursday’s meeting to create two lanes into the town, despite pleas from the public during morning access and boos from the gallery when the plan was adopted.

Even a rare public appearance by ex-councillor and Caltex station operator Warren Simmons in morning access wasn’t enough to persuade Crs Ibrahim, Woods, Hunter, Cubis and Wanchap from rejecting a rescission motion by Cr Duncan Dey.

Mr Simmons told the gallery it would cause more congestion and make it harder for his business and the First Sun Caravan park to operate. ‘You will force more traffic into the town quicker,’ he said.

Also the Byron Bay masterplan, which is being developed by consultants McGregor Coxall, should be included in the proposal, Mr Simmons said.

‘You’re putting the cart before the horse,’ he said. ‘This rescission motion tells councillors there’s something not quite right with this. I’m here not only because this will affect me, but it will also affect the town,’ he said.

Consultants McGregor Coxall have been tasked with creating a masterplan for the town, which is expected later this year.

Other speeches from residents during morning access also called upon councillors to adhere to responsible governance instead of ‘adhoc and irresponsible planning.’

Mayor Simon Richardson asked Mr Simmons how traffic was affected when there were two lanes coming into the town many years ago. Mr Simmons replied, ‘There used to be two lanes coming in from the west, and there were quite few accidents outside the police station in that time.’

Cr Duncan Dey, in introducing his rescission motion, told the gallery that the essence of it was ‘not a criticism of the project’.

‘But I am critical of the process, as the nature of this design was changing on the floor up until the last five minutes before we voted. I do not think that is good process for an engineering project. We have a masterplan underway… in the past we have always approached traffic in terms of managing it. This time, we are going to look at “how are we going to make it a nice place?” It could be that traffic is not the answer. We need to wait and look at those outcomes. There have been 1,400 submissions to the masterplan – you can’t ignore 1,400 people and jump in with your own ideas. It’s just wrong.

‘What I’m asking is to send that project down the same path as everybody else’s big dreams and little dreams. This won’t scotch the project, it will just analyse the project with the same glasses as every other project.’

Mayor shut down

During debate, argy bargy erupted, with Cr Cubis again clashing with mayor Simon Richardson over procedure.

The result led to the pro-development majority of Councillors – Crs Ibrahim, Woods, Hunter and Wanchap – to support Cr Cubis in shutting down the mayor from speaking on the topic.

Cr Ibrahim was clearly exasperated throughout the debate, and spoke with an irritated tone in his voice.

It started during morning access, when residents repeated their understanding that council intended to open a road up toward the beachfront.

When given the floor, Cr Ibrahim took his time in trying to clearly explain that a road to the beach would no longer be in the plan. But the confusion by the public could be well founded; Cr Dey had earlier pointed out that Cr Wanchap’s plan had been adhoc throughout the process and was ‘changed right up until it was voted upon.’

‘The facts were getting in the way of a good story’, Cr Ibrahim began, and then proceeded to enlighten the chamber as to why the plan has merit.

The planned bypass, he said, will require widening of the road anyway, so it won’t affect the master plan at the Butler Street roundabout. It was just the widening of the railway crossing that would be needed, so that two lanes could continue into the town.

‘The key things that this master plan is looking at is the rejuvenation of Railway Park. The other was the way the beachside currently operates…

‘We listened! We had a street front community meeting. We had people who owned properties and were affected and they spoke to us. We had a presentation from staff and we listened and we substantially and significantly changed the proposal in response to that community input. We are just widening the pinch point of the flow of traffic.

‘When I was elected, so many people came to me and said to me, “I don’t care what you do, I’m sick as a local, of sitting in traffic”. Right? Now if we widen that point, we can have a transit lane, a dedicated bus lane.

‘Are we going to try to ease the flow of traffic for locals, or are we going to say “stuff the tourists, stuff the locals, let’s make the traffic jam as long as we can in the hope they will all go away”. They’re not going away. I’ve been here 30 years and they’re not going away!’

At that point Cr Richardson asked how the community consultation, which Cr Ibrahim referred to, was run and asked who was invited and how many community members were there. It led to a tedious discussion whereupon Cr Cameron reminded councillors that the rescission motion was about the process, not the plan.

When the vote was taken, there were boos from the audience, who promptly got up and left in disgust.

Staff will now produce plans for the two lanes to be established into the town, running past the Caltex petrol station and across the disused railway tracks to the second roundabout in the town’s centre.

Presumably consent from both RMS and State Rail will be needed for it to be successful.


6 responses to “Byron’s ‘two lanes in’ plan rams through”

  1. BC says:

    How could anyone ignore advice from Warren Simmons about the traffic in that area?

  2. Helen says:

    Another pie in the sky doomed to fail plan by renegade Rose that has the backing of the other 4 conservatives. Most locals who have lived here for a long time know that this will not help to alleviate the traffic problem. At last account, and the plan changes all the time, the cost was going to be $200,000 of rate payers money. A lot of potholes could be fixed for this.

    Is Rose and the other 4 from the mob willing to refund council coffers when the scheme is finally shown to not work?

    Remember the damage done by this mob at the next council election. I doubt that Rose will stand as she would be afraid of the low primary vote that she would receive. We will hear some pitiful excuse.

    • F D says:

      A few years ago, when I was considering selling some property in Byron, I considered giving the task to Rose Wanchap and her Red Rose Realty because she appeared to be honest and reliable. I and many other locals have changed our opinion and feel completely betrayed by her actions which indicate a lack of honourable principles. I would never give my property to sell to this business.
      There is an old saying, “never trust and be wary of a used car salesman or real estate agent’.

  3. Steve keen says:

    Get over it. A recent visit to Sydney put things into perspective for me. 2 hours to travel 35km!!! In normal everyday traffic from Northern beaches to North sydney. No less than 15 sets of traffic lights. Made the wait into Byron feel like a holiday. Stop whining, put on some good tunes and thank the stars we live in an awesome place.

    • Neil says:

      Steve, your argument is illogical. Sydney has a population of 4.5 million and traffic jams are expected. Byron Bay has a population of 9,000 and 40 minutes on Ewingsdale Road to travel 3 kilometres is not acceptable. The release of the Byron Bay Master Plan may have some answers.

  4. Frank says:

    Not only did Cr Ibrahim come across as irritated at this meeting but he was just plain rude to a member of the public trying to make a submission during public access. Ibrahim interrupted this person several times during his submission, because he didn’t agree with what was being said.He had to ask Ibrahim to not interrupt him. The councillor can’t restrain himself. Sheer arrogance!

    I was also appalled by the “bully boy” tactics used by Cr Chris Cubis. Now that they have control of the chamber due to Rose Wanchap’s defection they are becoming more outrageous in their tactics. GROW UP BOYS!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers and is brought to you by our sponsor Vast Interior Ballina. Vast-NewLogo2017-300px