Lismore backs biodiversity strategy and rate rise

Lismore's Biodiversity Management Strategy would help fund things such as weed control to improve the local environment. But a group of councillors are trying to overturn its approval. Photo: Shutterstock

Lismore’s Biodiversity Management Strategy would help fund things such as weed control to improve the local environment. But a group of councillors are trying to overturn its approval. Photo: Shutterstock

A majority of Lismore City councillors last night knocked back an attempt to do away with the recently approved Biodiversity Management Plan.

The BMS involves a special rate variation that aims to raise $500,000 for environmental works, mainly in rural areas.

The BMS was approved at last month’s council meeting but five dissenting councillors lodge a rescission motion against the decision.

That motion was debated last night, but the decision to adopt the plan was supported by a majority of the councillors.

They were mayor Jenny Dowell, Simon Clough, Vanessa Ekins, Isaac Smith, Ray Houston and Glenys Richie.

Cr Greg Bennett, Gianpiero Battista, Neil Marks, Graham Meinke and and Mathew Scheibel.

Following the meeting, mayor Dowel posted a message on her Facebook page saying the rescission motion had failed.

‘5 Councillors tried to overturn last month’s decision in support of the Biodiversity Management Strategy by lodging a rescission motion- we debated it at an extraordinary meeting tonight and it was lost so last month’s decision to support the BMS – and a special rate variation to implement it – stands,’ Cr Dowell said.

The BMS will be accompanied by a rate rise, which is expected to start on July 1 2016.

At the previous meeting, Crs Jenny Dowell, Isaac Smith, Ray Houston, Vanessa Ekins, Simon Clough and Glenys Richie supported the strategy.

Greens Cl Vanessa Ekins had argued the strategy was the culmination of eleven-year process that had involved three environmental committees and extensive consultation.

‘We want it, we need it, we can afford it,” she said.

‘Water, air and soil are important and they are under threat.’

But Cr Bennett, perhaps the most vocal critic, argued the BMS would do nothing to assist farmers.

He argued that farmers’ incomes had declined in real terms by around 60 per cent over the last 50 or so years, while their costs were up 20 per cent in real terms.

‘Full time farmers simply have no capacity to pay rate increases,’ he said.

However, supportive Cls argued that 70 per cent of money raised by the special rate would be earmarked for projects in the rural areas.

2 responses to “Lismore backs biodiversity strategy and rate rise”

  1. Ken says:

    ‘We want it, we need it, we can afford it,”
    If this IS so, we don’t a rate hike ! do we ?
    IF Lismore Council was a competent body the Biodiversity would already be protected, but many instances of clearing protected native vegetation are routinely ignored.

  2. al oshlack says:

    OMG I am a person more than most who supports a concerted effort to have implemented a bio diversity strategy to protect our endangered fauna and flora,

    My fear not assisted by the photo with this report makes it appear that a good proportion of the half million dollars is to be a slush fund for Monsanto and it’s cronies,

    Of course while other countries are seeking to limit and in some cases have banned Glyphophates we are because of our slack laws and ignorance have virtually become a dumping ground for this toxic and insidious poison,

    With irony it is the rate payers and community who are footing the bill, the workers doing the job who are risking their health and of course the environment being subjected to the usual chemical onslaught year in and year out,

    I did note our worker/for the dole worker and/or volunteer although wearing a cotton mask was still bare skinned on a sunny day, he should take care as the surfactants in your typical Round Up mix help with the application of the herbicide, it is my understanding that the Round Up label cautions to avoid skin contact; OHS should be a high priority when it comes to the low paid or conscripted worker,

    There really needs to be some transparency and information made to the public regarding the cost, the environmental risks, the health hazards and effectiveness of Round Up by Councils, Greening and environmental care groups, thats a good start for a bio diversity strategy,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers and is brought to you by this week's sponsors Vast Interior Ballina and NORPA.