15.4 C
Byron Shire
May 25, 2022

Byron’s ‘Belongil Five’ stick to their rock-wall guns

Latest News

Bringing learning and play together

Byron Bay High School’s new agility course recognises the importance of play for learning and has students from all years actively playing during breaks and PDHPE lessons, according to Byron Bay High’s Principal, Janine Marcus.

Other News

Comment: Bridging the flooded divide

In the sodden floodplains the divide among those affected has never been clearer – those who were insured, and those who weren’t, renters and owners, Lismore LGA and everywhere else.

Never again

It seems to me that the floods became a ‘never again’ moment in time for Lismore and to a...

Review of community response called for as challenges recognised

Local community members stepped forward to help coordinate and respond to the disaster; from people getting into boats and kayaks recusing strangers in Lismore to coordinating local response hubs in the hinterland and local towns. But it wasn't all a bed of roses.

Historic sex assault and abduction – alleged offender charged

NSW Police say a man will spend the weekend in the lock-up after being refused bail today in Grafton following an investigation into the alleged historical sexual assault of a woman in Byron Bay more than 20 years ago.

Storylines – Stop the rot and take action

Having spent a long time reflecting on the last 13 weeks since the floods devastated our region, many important issues have come to my attention – loss of homes, possessions, safety, schools suspended from flooding, chaos, death, loss of animals, extreme anxiety and desperation, and so much more.

Will Morrison’s gas-led recovery delete the IPCC’s belief we need climate action now?

Most Australians know the news, or have had firsthand experiences themselves, of two years of floods, fires, coastal erosion, and storms, both here and overseas. In fact Australia has warmed on average by 1.44 ± 0.24 °C since national records began in 1910.

Byron Shire councillor Sol Ibrahim is leading the controversial push to turn Byron Bay into another Gold Coast with his zeal for a contentious rock wall at Belongil.
Byron Shire councillor Sol Ibrahim is leading the controversial push to turn Byron Bay into another Gold Coast with his zeal for a contentious rock wall at Belongil.

By Hans Lovejoy

My expert is more experty than yours.

The topic of Byron shire’s coastal management has thrashed about more than a kid on their first dental visit, but in this case, there appears to be no happy-gas ending: we are headed to becoming like the Gold Coast. Seriously.

The previous meeting saw an unusual occurrence, where the left leaning Byron shire councillors held the balance of power.

They pushed a motion through that would explore all the things the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) are saying – if you place hard things on beaches, you eventually lose the beach.

And if you lose the beach, then perhaps you might need to replenish the beach with an expensive sand nourishment program, and so on.

With the right wing back in charge at this meeting, it was time to ignore all that nonsense and tell the chamber loudly and confidently that their well-paid experts are better than the government’s.

The motion, which eventually passed, notes that a recent meeting took place with relevant parties – except councillors – over the cost benefit analysis (CBA) regarding the Coastal Hazard Management Study Byron Bay Embayment.

What’s that? It’s like the Local Environment Plan of the coast, and is being formulated as we speak by consultants to presumably recommend that rock wall type structures should be a preferred means of coastal management.

Cr Duncan Dey was the first to stick the needle in. ‘This is a case of science,’ he began.

‘What’s being knocked back in the motion today is simply statement of fact that has come from papers, investigations and documents etc from people who know what they are doing.

‘And they are being knocked back by people who have an opinion about the facts and figures that are being presented. So it’s a sad day for the coast. OEH have told us that when you do the cost benefit analysis correctly, planned retreat comes up the winner. And we don’t want to know about that, so we are going to rescind the motion that recognises that and replace it with one that doesn’t.

‘It’s window dressing. The reality is that the right way to deal with the coast is not have real estate occupying the beach, and this is probably the biggest contention.’

Cr Di Woods replied that, ‘We are reviewing, as result of OEH’s… umm arrr help – you may call it help, I call it interference. So we are doing what they want. I’m not being guided not by my view, but what our consultants [say]… who we pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to – over and over and over again. Millions of dollars, for their expert opinion. We decided that OEH, who have had their little say again and again, every time we get close… okay, we’ll listen to what you have to say.’

Cr Basil Cameron challenged Cr Woods on the difference between ‘our experts and theirs’.

‘There’s a clear difference – our so called experts were paid by us,’ he said. ‘They had an interest. The results were so appalling that what we got was what they thought we wanted. At best. OEH are not being paid by us. They have the public interest at heart,’ Cr Cameron said.

Cr Woods then defended that her faction was not addressing sand nourishment, and said, ‘the minister made a recent decision at Wirre beach…?’

For a moment Cr Woods is unsure of the name of the beach, however she was corrected by senior planner Shannon Burt, who said: “Wooli”.

Cr Woods continued, ‘They have said you cannot do sand nourishment. So let’s wait for our proposal…’

It was a heady and passionate debate, broken only by the momentary light unintentional humour of Cr Rose Wanchap sincerely asking why – if beaches will be lost to rocks walls – why has Belongil and the surf club at Main Beach still got sand (hint Rose: have a look at an old aerial photo of Byron).

Cr Dey refuted the idea that just because sand wasn’t brought in at Wooli beach doesn’t mean other places are OK. He referenced Jimmy’s Beach at Hawkes Nest.

‘They are struggling’, he said. ‘There’s a road in front of the beach, and it gets washed away when swells come into the bay because the bay faces south east.’

Cr Dey says that council consumed the first and second available sand sources and are now looking at their third. ‘And they don’t have one’.

‘We need to examine if it’s feasible to bring sand into Belongil. I agree – I don’t think it is. Then we need to be honest and say: “No sand nourishment, it will just be rock.”’ He finished by saying that the Belongil five were about to remove that discussion form the table.

It was those comments that fired up Cr Sol Ibrahim, the self-appointed pro-development faction leader, who said, ‘We in NSW accept that there are places that we believe that the value of infrastructure and assets is so great – and the impact on the community will be so great – that we will lose the beach.’

‘Eventually, with sea level rise, and other factors. For example on the Gold Coast, there’s no question of planned retreat there. Walls are going up, and in 20, 30, 40 years time there maybe a time where there is no beach. And the Gold Coast will have to deal with that. Because it’s accepted that removing high rises and roads etc – the cost is just too great. It’s the same in Sydney. It’s also  happened at Lennox Head, at certain times of the year.’

Cr Ibrahim also spoke of what he believes are engineering models that will allow a beach to still exist.

He concluded with: ‘The real debate is – when does the cost of retreat become so great that it exceeds the cost of losing the beach? When is too costly? Do we have enough beaches around?’

There you have it: under this council led by Cr Ibrahim and his slim-majority faction, Byron Shire is set to become like the Gold Coast. As a shire, are we all prepared to make the decision to sacrifice/lose our iconic coast to beachfront real estate?

It appears the ‘Belongil Five’ (the pro-development faction) have made their minds up on our behalf.

So who are WRL?

Cr Woods says repeatedly that council have ‘spent millions’ with these consultants, who are drafting coastal plans which will be submitted to the state for approval.

From their website www.wrl.unsw.edu.au/about-us, they say:

‘WRL can best be described as an expert problem solver in engineering relating to water, the coast, the environment and groundwater. WRL undertakes commercial projects that address complicated water engineering problems…’

Are they impartial to looking at other options other than commercial projects? You decide.

Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.


  1. Reminds me exactly of the USSR
    soviets had identical attitudes to ‘science’

    And, i guess, whats happening in the council is exactly like Animal Farm

    Heard of that, Rose and Sol?

    Or do you only read the hungry little caterpiller

    ( hint. It’s what Dubya was reading when the buildings in new york blew up)

  2. Once again, we don’t get ‘reporting’ from the Echo. We get sensationalist fear mongering opinion, pushing an agenda to destroy private property, to benefit no one. How on earth is Belongil going to end up anything like the Gold Coast? Belongil rate payers have no interest in development. Just the right to protect and maintain the coastline – in the fairly static state that it has been in since the sand mining stopped and rock protection was put in place by the Erosion Trust and others going back 30 years. The only rocks that really interfere with the beach are the ones protecting the main part of town.

  3. Call an engineering lab for engineering ideas.

    Call an adaptive planning or land- and sea- scape architecture team,
    who works with community, for a truly socio-ecologic forward thinking community based plan.

    Consider the team behind the award winning living breakwaters response in NYC for Staten Island: they involved fifty-one groups from schools and residents groups and historical societies to state and federal agencies.

  4. At which part of the meeting did any of the councilors suggest in any way, that they wanted Belingil to adopt a ‘glitzy Gold Coast look’ which is what the Echo email headline said. Word for word.

    It is important not to dumb down and simplify the science to achieve a polical goal. For example – yes hard surfaces in the water can contribute to the loss of sand. However the rocks at Belongil are only in the water after big storm events and during very high tides. The same as the natural rocks at the back of the beach at Wategoes etc. and sand has been there for thousands of years, despite the rocks! You don’t need a Sydney scientist to tell you that the sand always returns. Just walk down to Belongil and have a look. The rocks there are not interfering with any coastal process 99% of the time. And the 1% of the time they are wet, they are stopping erosion and not causing it.

    The rocks in town are a different story. They are always in the water being hit by waves. No one seems to have a problem with those rocks. Funny, that. Because the anti rocks mob arent really interested in rocks and the beach at all are they? They simply want to see some houses under water so they can say ‘I told you so’.

  5. Quote/ “why has Belongil and the surf club at Main Beach still got sand (hint Rose: have a look at an old aerial photo of Byron).”

    Didn’t the sand mining remove most of the sand well before the rock wall in front surf club at Main Beach was built?


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Race action at the TVSC Mother’s Day meet

A dedicated fleet of 13 boats took to the water for the Tweed Valley Sailing Club’s (TVSC) Winter series on Mother’s Day earlier this month.

Entertainment in the Byron Shire for the week beginning 25 May, 2022

The Jezabels The Jezabels are on a national tour to celebrate the 10th Anniversary of their multi-award winning Gold Album Prisoner. For the first time, the band will be playing their...

Comment: Bridging the flooded divide

In the sodden floodplains the divide among those affected has never been clearer – those who were insured, and those who weren’t, renters and owners, Lismore LGA and everywhere else.

Grants to support arts and culture flood recovery

Nearly 50 arts and cultural organisations, screen practitioners, individual artists and collaborative groups impacted by recent floods will have access to $500,000 in funding.