Cost to lift sewerage moratorium

Alan Dickens, Brunswick Heads

What has it cost the rate payers of Byron Shire to have the Clause 45 Sewerage Moratorium lifted?.

The main issue for clause 45 was overloaded waste water treatment plants in BSC.

Wastewater Steering Committees were formed to make recommendations to council on the sewerage problems.

A strategy was formulated to remove effluent from our rivers and creeks plus insure that effluent leaving the STP’s was of a suitable standard for reuse.

The EPA actually wanted 100 % reuse generated from West Byron as a condition of BSC being able to take South Byron STP offline as is usually the case the EPA goes missing as far as insuring this or any target has been reached.

I believe the reuse system from West Byron is a sham there are simply not enough sites to take the reuse being generated by West Byron STP so where is it going?.

The majority is being pumped to the Byron Bay Golf Course dam but the golf course uses  the effluent from Byron at Byron as their main source of irrigation not the water in the dam so why keep pumping effluent from West Byron STP into it?..

The report going to council from the Utility Manager employed by BSC on the 2nd. of June page 84/85 state that the effluent leaving Brunswick Valley STP is not even suitable to flush toilets with or to be used for irrigating food crops or sporting fields etc. this was supposedly a cutting Waste Water Treatment Plant so what has happened,  it would not have anything to do with the deep infiltration entering the  gravity mains causing the plant to be hydraulically overloaded would it?.

There has to be some serious questions asked here as to the competency of the management employed by BSC in Water and Recycling.

The management of W&R have used excuses and misleading information so that this absolute mess remains a secret it is time the General Manager Ken Gainger starting asking some serious questions  of the Director of W&R Phil Holloway as to are  the people employed to manage the operational section of W&R competent to do the job.

This fact that after all the millions they have spent of rate payer’s funds since 2002 and we still have this mess in W&R you would have to think not.

One response to “Cost to lift sewerage moratorium”

  1. Alex says:

    Same follow up is required for the industrial fields, such as like mining, refining, semiconductors and so. The amount of wastewater that being dumped into rivers and oceans is unbearable.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Become a supporter of The Echo

A note from the editorial team

Some of The Echo’s editorial team: journalists Paul Bibby and Aslan Shand, editor Hans Lovejoy, photographer Jeff Dawson and Mandy Nolan

The Echo has never underestimated the intelligence and passion of its readers. In a world of corporate banality and predictability, The Echo has worked hard for more than 30 years to help keep Byron and the north coast unique with quality local journalism and creative ideas. We think this area needs more voices, reasoned analysis and ideas than just those provided by News Corp, lifestyle mags, Facebook groups and corporate newsletters.

The Echo is one hundred per cent locally owned and one hundred per cent independent. As you have probably gathered from what is happening in the media industry, it is not cheap to produce a weekly newspaper and a daily online news service of any quality.

We have always relied entirely on advertising to fund our operations, but often loyal readers who value our local, independent journalism have asked how they could help ensure our survival.

Any support you can provide to The Echo will make an enormous difference. You can make a one-off contribution or a monthly one. With your help, we can continue to support a better informed local community and a healthier democracy for another 30 years.”

Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers.