Tirade at the unemployed a smarmy swipe

John Scrivener, Main Arm. 

Colin Clarke’s latest tirade – Bangalow food hub opponents elitist – sets a new low for letters to the editor.

When he’s not spruiking for nuclear power and genetic engineering, Colin likes to use the Echo’s letters section to attack fellow letter writers and ‘you people’ who sit around doing nothing all day.

I can’t help but cringe when I read phrases like ‘too many people are happy to lean on the rest of society and take unemployment benefits’, especially when written by someone who likes to promote an industry that leans heavily on the rest of society, requires multi-billion dollar subsidies from governments but employs relatively few people.

The insinuation that unemployment is a result of people being happy to live on handouts not only smacks of prejudice, it completely obscures the actual causes and function of unemployment. Colin’s rhetoric might sound plausible to those who have never known economic hardship, but the truth is poverty sucks, and unemployment in this society equals poverty.

No one chooses to live in poverty: it is forced upon them by circumstances beyond their control. Many economists recognise that unemployment is due in large part to changes in the structure of the economy, for example manufacturing jobs going to countries with cheaper labour and fewer regulations. Technological advances such as automation also contribute to unemployment, with machines and computers now doing much of the work once done by labourers. Furthermore, it serves the interests of corporate owners to have a pool of unemployed workers, which helps keep wages down and workers submissive.

Jobs cost money and someone has to pay for them. How do we calculate the cost of a job for a politician, or a soldier? More money is spent on the employment of a few hundred politicians or a few thousand soldiers than is spent on a hundred thousand unemployed people. Think about the comparative value of these expenditures, all of which are paid by the taxpayer.

Most of the money going to politicians and the military ends up in off-shore tax havens and the coffers of multinational corporations, whereas every cent spent on the unemployed goes straight into the local economy. The unemployed play another important role: they serve as a scapegoat that can be smeared with impunity because, unlike the nuclear industry, they can’t afford an army of lawyers and lobbyists to protect and promote their interests.

Unemployment benefits are like a ball and chain that stigmatise and constrain the individual. These so-called benefits are not given out easily or willy-nilly by bureaucrats, despite claims to the contrary. They are provided only after applicants have jumped through hoops, navigated multiple obstacles and completed endless forms contrived to dissuade all but the most desperate.

I don’t accept the premise advanced by Colin Clarke, that the unemployed in our region are living in a false world, devoid of honest toil. I think his tirade amounts to little more than a smarmy swipe at the least privileged in our community.

3 responses to “Tirade at the unemployed a smarmy swipe”

  1. Anara Carroll says:

    Excellent letter, thanks John

  2. frank says:

    Yo John, great letter but should you be in North Korea, China and maybe Russia for the tirade you have exacted from Main Arm. Your living in the wrong place dude.

  3. Bernard says:

    Hey John,

    Absolute garbage. Everyone has the abilty to make a choice and if people choose to flock to and live in Byron Shire when it is well known there are limited work opportunities, then they are indeed just lazy bludgers that are happy to live off the hardworking. There is ample work in Australia and if the poor young snowflakes are so determined to work, well then, why dont they move to an area where work is plentiful.

    The main problem with the shire is that every dreamer, wannabe life coach, therapist etc think its their right to enjoy the region while rarely contributing to the economic aspects that keep a society alive.

    More investment equals more jobs, wealthe creation for all and more happy families.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Become a supporter of The Echo

A note from the editorial team

Some of The Echo’s editorial team: journalists Paul Bibby and Aslan Shand, editor Hans Lovejoy, photographer Jeff Dawson and Mandy Nolan

The Echo has never underestimated the intelligence and passion of its readers. In a world of corporate banality and predictability, The Echo has worked hard for more than 30 years to help keep Byron and the north coast unique with quality local journalism and creative ideas. We think this area needs more voices, reasoned analysis and ideas than just those provided by News Corp, lifestyle mags, Facebook groups and corporate newsletters.

The Echo is one hundred per cent locally owned and one hundred per cent independent. As you have probably gathered from what is happening in the media industry, it is not cheap to produce a weekly newspaper and a daily online news service of any quality.

We have always relied entirely on advertising to fund our operations, but often loyal readers who value our local, independent journalism have asked how they could help ensure our survival.

Any support you can provide to The Echo will make an enormous difference. You can make a one-off contribution or a monthly one. With your help, we can continue to support a better informed local community and a healthier democracy for another 30 years.”

Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers.