Menu

Thus Spake Mungo: Who’s telling porkies now?

Exclusive, scoop, shock, horror! Politicians tell porkies!

In an amazing journalistic breakthrough, it can be revealed that sometimes Australia’s political leaders may not hold strictly to the unvarnished truth. Lengthy and painstaking research shows that there are times when they exaggerate and even mislead the public in a quest for advantage.

The misinformation can extend across all parties analysis suggests that it can be particularly prevalent in election campaigns …

Well, yes; few voters will be surprised at this news, although there are those who may be despondent, and still a few are in denial – at least when it concerns their own side of the fence.

After being dragged reluctantly to the festivities when he hung on with his well manicured fingernails after the 2016 election, Malcolm Turnbull fulminated about the duplicity of Bill Shorten and what he termed Mediscare – the well orchestrated Labor message that the government was not only prepared to run down the public health system, but to sell it off to private interests.

With steam coming out of his ears, the barely re-elected prime minister howled that this was unconscionable, a bare-faced lie – and indeed it was at the very least hyperbole, defined by the Macquarie dictionary as an exaggerated statement not meant to be taken literally.

Given the evidence of the coalition’s tweaking of Medicare by Turnbull and his predecessor Tony Abbott, Shorten’s line was credible – just barely, although it appears that was almost enough. But it was not, as Turnbull hyperventilated, entirely factual. Unforgiveable, he declared: something really had to be done to improve the standards of political discourse, to ensure honesty in the debate.

It would take a sledgehammer, a wrecking ball to the housing market, and indeed to the economy as a whole, Turnbull warned: no homeowner would be spared from the depredations as house prices crashed, rentals soared and we would all be ruined.

But, as he well knew, he was sitting on a few porkies of his own. For months, Turnbull and his colleagues had indulged in more than a little hyperbole over Labor’s plan to reduce what even Turnbull’s Treasurer, Scott Morrison, had called the excesses of the negative gearing regime.

It would take a sledgehammer, a wrecking ball to the housing market, and indeed to the economy as a whole, Turnbull warned: no homeowner would be spared from the depredations as house prices crashed, rentals soared and we would all be ruined.

But as we now know, our prime minister was perfectly aware that none of this was based on any more than his own rhetoric: his own treasury experts had told him that any effect would be minor. And in case had he not got that message, the boffins in his own state, New South Wales, had told him that not only would rationalising negative gearing do little if any harm to prices, it could actually marginally improve housing affordability – a key plank for the newly appointed premier Gladys Berejiklian.

Berejiklian chose not to confront Turnbull over the issue, which was hardly surprising; but it would be strange if she or one of her colleagues had not at least mentioned the report, and if they chose the better part of valour, it is a very safe bet that their respective bureaucrats were totally au fait with it. Turnbull’s attack was not just a sin of omission; he knew perfectly well that what he was saying was not just an oratorical extravagance, but deliberate bullshit: Negascare, perhaps.

So, as always, truth was the first casualty in the ongoing political war. And the question is, as Turnbull asked as he reached the climax of his election night tirade, what can be done about it?

Regrettably, but predictably, the answer is: not much. Any rather half-hearted efforts at reform, run invariably by the minor parties (Labor and the Coalition , despite their expostulations, are actually pretty happy with the system as it is) have usually been broken on the rock of free speech: this is not actually written into our constitution, but on more than one occasion the High Court has found that it is somehow implied, and that as a result political propaganda, however over the top, is all but sacrosanct.

Many years ago the then leader of the Australian Democrats, Don Chipp, attempted to take on a particularly egregious instance after the 1977 election: quixotically, he hoped that his new party’s motto, Keep the Bastards Honest, might actually impinge on reality. The court, of course, found otherwise and Chipp lamented that the verdict proved that not only was it permissible to lie during election campaigns, it was virtually compulsory.

No-one expects politicians to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth; their job is to speak at the despatch box, not in the witness box. But equally, we would prefer them not to confirm the old joke about the way you can tell if a politician is lying is because his lips are moving.

Their most blatant absurdities seldom matter: the deranged predictions that Julia Gillard’s carbon tax would wipe out the township of Whyalla and increase the price of a leg of lamb to $100 were greeted more with weary amusement than serious trepidation. But at least a casual acquaintance with the facts would be a help.

When Josh Frydenberg continues to assert that the government’s policies are working to reduce carbon emissions when they are demonstrably not or when Matt Canavan repeats that the Adani mine will generate 10,000 jobs when Adani itself admits that the real figure is a fraction of that, it is more than just fudging: it is conscious mendacity and should be called out as such.

But not, alas, by Malcolm Turnbull, for whom reality must be subservient to the politics of the party room, in 2018 as it was back in 2016 and when, no doubt, it will still be in even greater measure as the next polling day approaches. And he will probably tell us, once again, that the election is all about trust. Well, perhaps his family trust. That at least would be more than partly correct.

In the meantime we should not hold our breaths for the really astonishing headline: Politicians stick to the facts.

 

 


4 responses to “Thus Spake Mungo: Who’s telling porkies now?”

  1. Len Heggarty says:

    There is the ham, the leg pulling and the porkies. and we commentators are right in there with the pen writing about politicians. The heat is on, so lets do some frying of these so-called mediators.
    There is some fat. We have to cut. Struth, as we break some eggs in the pan and make sure we don’t get egg on face we start to cook by the book and we turn the page and right what they think they said verbatum It could be something near enough to the truth. As Keating said so long ago lets bring home the bacon.

  2. Scott says:

    The solution of course is to follow Canada’s lead. Make truth a requisite for media reporting on politicians.

    Thus fact checking would have stopped the short term carbon tax lie of what was always a Emissions Trading Scheme. Emphasis on the trading. That is a market commodity being traded is never a tax.

    Many more. At least that way the compulsion to lie will be reduced. Canada has been rewarded by not having a Murdoch infestation as a result. Business model fails.

  3. Neville says:

    As a protest of their political dishonesty why cant we mere serfs be allowed to remove our identities from the electoral roll to de criminalize our involvement in their political process of having our names associated with such dishonest people /

  4. Willaim says:

    Call it what you like, even a unicorn if you will seeing we are in the far north coast. If it quacks like a duck etc etc etc its a bloody duck. Why do you find it so difficult to admit the truth?.
    You mean instead of Murdoch we should have SBS, The Guardian,CNN, BBC, SMH, WP, NYT and most disgustingly the ABC who collectively peddle their poisonous paradigm of socialism aided and abetted by failed commentators.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Become a supporter of The Echo

A note from the editorial team

Some of The Echo’s editorial team: journalists Paul Bibby and Aslan Shand, editor Hans Lovejoy, photographer Jeff Dawson and Mandy Nolan

The Echo has never underestimated the intelligence and passion of its readers. In a world of corporate banality and predictability, The Echo has worked hard for more than 30 years to help keep Byron and the north coast unique with quality local journalism and creative ideas. We think this area needs more voices, reasoned analysis and ideas than just those provided by News Corp, lifestyle mags, Facebook groups and corporate newsletters.

The Echo is one hundred per cent locally owned and one hundred per cent independent. As you have probably gathered from what is happening in the media industry, it is not cheap to produce a weekly newspaper and a daily online news service of any quality.

We have always relied entirely on advertising to fund our operations, but often loyal readers who value our local, independent journalism have asked how they could help ensure our survival.

Any support you can provide to The Echo will make an enormous difference. You can make a one-off contribution or a monthly one. With your help, we can continue to support a better informed local community and a healthier democracy for another 30 years.”

Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers and is brought to you by this week's sponsor Vast Ballina and Falls Festival