Menu

Councillor speaks of the ‘declining standards in local governance’

Basil Cameron

By Cr Basil Cameron

Poorly considered comments from the departing general manager (GM) in a recent report to Council have rightly stirred up much discussion in our little democracy.

The tensions leading to this final spray have been evident and building since late last year, when a struggle between the general manager and the mayor spilled out over the Byron Town Centre Masterplan implementation. 

No doubt there is, and probably always will be, tension between elected councillors and the administration. 

It comes with the territory. However, in my opinion, the general manager crossed the line by entering the political debate with his commentary and undermined good governance by failing to apply consistent policy and fair process over a long period.

Too often his actions and his directions to staff proceded without consultation with the elected council and, critically, in the absence of any resolution of Council.  

Declining standards of governance have been a matter of concern for me going back to the previous council, and I have spoken up both behind the scenes and in open council.

Despite my criticisms, it has been difficult to get a focus on any substantial action or reform, in part because popular political narratives have given cover to some ‘Courageously avoiding responsibility’ as noted by the Echo editor.  

The truth is that the general manager’s actions were largely a product of the most important relationship in the organisation – his relationship with the mayor.

As an experienced operator, the general manager gave every indication that he understood the mayor’s political imperatives and ensured these were catered to.

In the previous council where the mayor was in the political minority, this was largely limited to skewing process (eg the disbanding of the Tourism Advisory Committee), although there were occasions where the pair made decisions later announced as a fait accompli.

One example was the ‘commitment’ given to Byron Bay businesses to quarantine a percentage of paid parking revenue given prior to any decision of the elected council. 

Free-rein GM

After the last election, the perception that the mayor commanded a majority seemed to deepen a mutually beneficial relationship.

The mayor was given access to a research officer to assist in the development of his pet projects while the general manager was given a free rein over projects important to them both, notably the Byron Bay Masterplan implementation.

It is clear from a report to the Finance Committee last week that more than $120,000 has been spent without a budget or backed by resolution.

Behind the scenes, the general manager was also giving direction to staff inconsistent with Council’s resolutions. The full extent of these transgressions are only now becoming apparent.

While it is not possible to know who directed whom in all cases, it is clear that the mayor was aware at times. 

Avoiding public scrutiny

It also seems likely that staff felt unable to bring these issues to the attention of other councillors owing to the signals sent by the mayor in his willingness to bypass good process.

In particular, his repeated attempts to push certain developments contrary to policy and staff advice, something he rightly complained loudly about during the previous council.

The reliance on urgency motions at the end of meetings to pursue these and other matters avoids public scrutiny, as there is no mention of the items in the council’s meeting agendas and no opportunity for residents to speak on the matters in public access.

One such decision to give over public space to a business has ended up in court to the detriment of ratepayers.

As Council is looking to engage a new general manager, it is clearly an opportune time to be discussing the issues and making sure that the next occupant of the position has the principles of good governance front of mind every day s/he is in the job.

Similarly they must be tasked with ensuring processes and a culture that embeds these principles into the organisation.

Perhaps it is the case that the mayor believes the end justifies the means.

However, it should be clear that if the elected council is to best serve the community, the mayor needs to demonstrate and insist on sound governance in all his relationships within Council. 

Otherwise, he risks the new general manager again getting away from him, the council and the community.

 

• Basil Cameron has been an independent councillor since 2008.


8 responses to “Councillor speaks of the ‘declining standards in local governance’”

  1. Jimbo says:

    Comments from the departing general manager (GM) in a recent report to Council have left a sour taste in the mouths of council.
    I am one who will not bite my tongue any longer as tensions rise beyond the fiasco of the last council. Being in council is a struggle between what the ratepayers need and the need for Council to raise much needed funds to satisfy that public need. Many eyes have been looking upwards to leadership and beyond the ceiling and it came to pass that the GM and the mayor did not see eye to eye over the Byron Town Centre masterplan.

  2. Anonymous says:

    Dear Cr Cameron

    I voted for you.
    I believe in your wisdom, and I’m thankful for all the work you do.

    Thank you for placing your opinion regarding the General Manager’s irresponsible actions against the mayor.

    I’m not sure if the GM would dare to betray the public without support within non voted staff members, holding power there for over 20 years.

    Would you have stopped him?

  3. don says:

    So Basil, like a couple of other elected councilors, who pledged a herbicide free future for the Shire before they were elected, are you on the herbicide free council register?

  4. Geoffrey Suthon says:

    Et tu, Brute?

  5. Tom Tabart says:

    Before you quote J Caesar you should check your history.
    JC was a genocidal, tyrant.
    Don’t see the comparison here.

  6. David says:

    Simon resembling pin cushion?

  7. Liz L says:

    Marcus Antonius, ubi es?

Leave a Reply to Tom Tabart Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Become a supporter of The Echo

A note from the editorial team

Some of The Echo’s editorial team: journalists Paul Bibby and Aslan Shand, editor Hans Lovejoy, photographer Jeff Dawson and Mandy Nolan

The Echo has never underestimated the intelligence and passion of its readers. In a world of corporate banality and predictability, The Echo has worked hard for more than 30 years to help keep Byron and the north coast unique with quality local journalism and creative ideas. We think this area needs more voices, reasoned analysis and ideas than just those provided by News Corp, lifestyle mags, Facebook groups and corporate newsletters.

The Echo is one hundred per cent locally owned and one hundred per cent independent. As you have probably gathered from what is happening in the media industry, it is not cheap to produce a weekly newspaper and a daily online news service of any quality.

We have always relied entirely on advertising to fund our operations, but often loyal readers who value our local, independent journalism have asked how they could help ensure our survival.

Any support you can provide to The Echo will make an enormous difference. You can make a one-off contribution or a monthly one. With your help, we can continue to support a better informed local community and a healthier democracy for another 30 years.”

Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers.