Thus Spake Mungo: Turnbull’s economics 101

Our mild-mannered prime minister has become an uncompromising economic fundamentalist. ‘The law of supply and demand,’ he proclaimed, ‘cannot be suspended.’

Well, up to a point, Mr Turnbull; actually it is not a law but something of an ideal, a belief that if the market was absolutely free and safe from interference by pesky governments that its invisible hand would always even things out in a harmonious equilibrium.

The idea is that is when supply gets tight, demand rises, and vice versa. Thus when there are a lot of jobs available, employers will not have to offer high wages to attract staff. On the other hand when there is a scarcity of workers, employers have to cough up.

Given that Turnbull is constantly boasting about the number of new jobs created on his watch, you might think that that the current stagnation in wages is entirely as it should be. But our leader is going more Keynesian – if we offer more money to the employers, especially the bigger ones, it will follow as the night the day that there will be more investment, more jobs, higher wages and a chicken in every pot.

Well, in a perfect market, untouched by human intervention, that might be a chance. But in the real world – and in particular the real world of Australia – it is very unlikely to work like that. The Australian market, and particularly the tax regime, is complex, highly regulated and skewed beyond recognition from the elegant simplicity of Economics 101.

And given that the skewing is overwhelmingly in favour of the wealthy, the idea that reducing their taxes will result in more than the smallest trickle down to the masses is no more than wishful thinking. They have many other ways to dispose of a windfall.

Apart from the obvious distortions to the system, like dividend imputation, family trusts, negative gearing, capital gains discounts, innumerable exemptions ranging from legitimate tools of trade to advertising costs and, most absurdly, political donations, favourable treatment for big superannuants and all the smaller lurks and perks involving travel, entertainment and the massive rort of attending professional conferences in the south of France, there are plenty of other ways to make sure that whatever tax breaks a compliant government provides end up not with their workers, but with the directors and shareholders – the capitalists.

We have already seen that in the United States, where the vast majority of those who will be the beneficiaries of Donald Trump’s cutting of the company rate from 35 per cent to 21 per cent have shamelessly announced that they will use the loot for share buy-backs, paying off debts or losses, or simply enhancing corporate profits.

Given that the Australian model has already seen large increases in the profit share do almost nothing for wage earners – those who have not been retrenched in the perennial quest for higher dividends and larger executive bonuses – there is no sensible reason to assume that they will suddenly afflicted by a social conscience on this side of the Pacific.

Or indeed anywhere else: parts of Europe are searching for an accord somewhat in the manner of the one devised by Bob Hawke in 1983, in which a deal can be negotiated so that employees have some guarantee that they receive at least a share of whatever largesse becomes available. Turnbull’s fundamentalism would regard that as interference with the market – as if the market had not already been molested beyond recognition.

But in any case, what is the real argument for big corporate tax cuts? As has been already pointed out, profits, after the slump after the end of the mining boom and the hit from the Global Financial Crisis, have recovered and are now doing very nicely thank you. And the claim that Australia will be left behind by the current rate (25 per cent for those up to $50 million a year and 30 per cent for those above it) can only be sustained by comparing apples and oranges.

The evidence – as opposed to the theory – is stark: trickle down economics has almost never worked and when it has, it is because there really has been something like a free – well, freeish – market. Australia has never had one of those any time in the last 200 years.

With all the fiscal fiddling from successive, mainly coalition, governments, the effective rate in Australia is about 17 per cent – in the bottom half of the OECD scale. In particular it is lower than the USA’s 21 per cent, which is far more straightforward. Our tycoons are in no danger of being left behind, even in the unlikely event they pay what the Australian Tax Office valiantly but often vainly attempts to enforce. And as for the multinationals – forget it. They are, as always, laughing all the way to their havens in the Bahamas.

As the former Australian Industry Group chief and Reserve Bank board member Heather Ridout admitted last week on Q&A, the issue has become a polarising one, which is why Turnbull, having emerged from his beach at Point Piper, is trying to frame it as an example of Bill Shorten’s anti-business agenda.

He has to be negative because when you get through the waffle, rant and bullshit, it is pretty hard to make a positive case: the mere assertions about the law of supply and demand, the declaration that supply-side economics is simply common sense, just won’t cut it.

The evidence – as opposed to the theory – is stark: trickle down economics has almost never worked and when it has, it is because there really has been something like a free – well, freeish – market. Australia has never had one of those any time in the last 200 years and is now so entangled with scams and shenanigans to have become more akin to a command economy – which is fine for Turnbull, as long as he issues the commandments.

John Hewson, a Liberal leader who was once a real free marketer (he has since reformed) once spoke of an insight he discovered when trying to get to terms with the nation’s economy. It was, he said, a bit like a rubber sheet, best undisturbed. Whenever you gave one bit of it a poke, it meant another lump bobbed up somewhere else.

Turnbull is looking at more than a poke: his so-called enterprise tax scheme would belt the rubber sheet like a sledgehammer, a wrecking ball – and grateful moguls would no doubt bob up all over the place. But it would not follow (except in Turnbull’s version of Economics 101) that too many workers would be elevated above the unwholesome coverlet.

Polarising, yes; perhaps good politics among his own class warriors. But an inexorable economic law? In your dreams, Malcolm.

8 responses to “Thus Spake Mungo: Turnbull’s economics 101”

  1. Len Heggarty says:

    Mild-mannered Malcolm Turnbull has become an uncompromising economic fundamentalist. He proclaims: ‘The law of supply and demand, cannot be suspended.’ That is his principle.

  2. robot says:

    The problem is well explained, inexorable. The real problem is the alternative. The environmentalists would have us all growing our own carrots, cars and planes every other day until none at all, second rate steel, two refugees to every family, and top up welfare while we dig through our refuse for saleable recyclables. The Shorten solution is to reward anyone with a gripe, if they’re of voting age. Supply and Demand economics is not perfect, like your chances at Keno is not good. But what else?

  3. robot says:

    I have some super, not millions but thous. You remove business incentive, for big or small, equally none will risk their future in it. 9 of 10 businesses collapse within a year or two, so pressure more that, the normal, risks capitalism itself. And the alternative is anarchy, as some Greens espouse, or your realthing Command ecomy, as the essentials of socialism espouse, given the fact real communism fails within weeks. So what else?

  4. Tuatha says:

    The point of the Invisible Hand, as per Adam Smith, is that it is always in the pocket on the worker & consumer.
    It does NOT distribute gains proportionately else there’d be no such beast as profit.
    By definition, an employer must pay the employee less than the value of the output of the aforesaid.
    Mungo is letting his his Dismal Science training overwhelm his social sensibility.

  5. Joachim Staats says:

    Today The ABC reveals that 1 in 5 big corporates don’t pay tax or haven’t paid tax for a number of years. So where is this urgent need then for Mal & Scotty to cut Australia’s corporate tax rate and hand out $65billions. I mean if they ain’t paying anything now they still won’t be paying anything under Mal & Scotty’s trickle down hocus pocus….they ain’t paying tax and they ain’t paying those higher wages either which contradicts the logic of Mal & Scotty. It will be $65billions just pissed away and a lot of it will be overseas.

  6. Richard says:

    The “laws” of supply and demand are no such thing. They are, at best, psychological generalisations. Enunciated without any fuller psychological theory, they are nonsense.

    What happens when the supply of labour gets close to being equal to the jobs available? An emergency is declared, immigration is stepped up, people are urged to have more children, employers band together to minimise wage growth, unions are crippled and strikes delcared to be a disgrace, or are made illegal—as appears to be the case now.

    Very little pressure is put on employers in large businesses by a few people changing jobs. It is only mass action—that is, strikes— that lead to wage growth.

  7. Tom Tabart says:

    The economic rationalist/pundits above are living in in a vanishing world and what is vanishing is the environment which enables the capitalist system.
    Unfortunately for us all we have largely destroyed our environment which conventional economics has always regarded as a free resource.
    Capitalism with its reliance on constant growth is dying fast requiring two more worlds of resources and pollution sinks to continue. And this does not even take global warming into account.
    So you can argue all you like about how many angels fit on the head of a pin but we need a drastically new economic model if we are to survive as a species.

  8. agedcarenurse says:

    If the law of supply and demand worked in labour markets, then aged care nurses would have experienced huge pay rises over the years because of the shortage of labour. Instead many aged care facilities cannot fill shifts, even nursing agencies cannot supply staff and Assistants in Nursing are paid less than check-out clerks in supermarkets. It seems that biscuits have a value while our vulnerable aged do not.
    Then we consider CEO compensation which has skyrocketed in recent years because apparently there is a shortage of people wanting to do that work!

Leave a Reply to Tom Tabart Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Become a supporter of The Echo

A note from the editorial team

Some of The Echo’s editorial team: journalists Paul Bibby and Aslan Shand, editor Hans Lovejoy, photographer Jeff Dawson and Mandy Nolan

The Echo has never underestimated the intelligence and passion of its readers. In a world of corporate banality and predictability, The Echo has worked hard for more than 30 years to help keep Byron and the north coast unique with quality local journalism and creative ideas. We think this area needs more voices, reasoned analysis and ideas than just those provided by News Corp, lifestyle mags, Facebook groups and corporate newsletters.

The Echo is one hundred per cent locally owned and one hundred per cent independent. As you have probably gathered from what is happening in the media industry, it is not cheap to produce a weekly newspaper and a daily online news service of any quality.

We have always relied entirely on advertising to fund our operations, but often loyal readers who value our local, independent journalism have asked how they could help ensure our survival.

Any support you can provide to The Echo will make an enormous difference. You can make a one-off contribution or a monthly one. With your help, we can continue to support a better informed local community and a healthier democracy for another 30 years.”

Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers.