Byron Train – a view on viability

Byron’s solar train as it was delivered. Photo supplied

Raphael Lee Cass


My jaw dropped in amazement when Byron Bay Train asked for volunteer train drivers and attendants. The requirements for these jobs were incredibly stringent. Train driver applicants needed availability for flexible work arrangements, to train others, to know all OH&S matters, do office work, maintenance work and many others. Volunteer Passenger Attendants needed just as much. An exceptional ask for volunteers.

The owner of Byron Bay Railroad Company Ltd is ultimately Brian Flannery, who declared the train open on December 16, 2017.

BRW Rich List

Flannery, according to the Financial Review, is a Brisbane-based engineer, has investments in uranium mining in Energy Resources of Australia, is a member of the BRW Rich List – after making $530 million from the sale of Felix Resources to Chinese firm Yanzhou Coal in 2009 – has shares in listed retirement village company Aveo, owns private property group KTQ Developments with wife Peggy and has projects including Brisbane apartments, $100–120million Elements of Byron Bay and childcare investments.

The train is a not-for-profit company. It means the train is financially isolated from Elements, doesn’t pay income tax, and any profit made must go back into the train business. It could be employing locals and enriching Byron. In my opinion asking for volunteers means only one thing that the business is not financially viable.

The train is a delightful ride through beautiful Byron. Like other trains, Puffing Billy and Zig Zag in Lithgow, it is there for tourism. It isn’t serious public transport.

Serious transport would have seen it travel from at least Byron Hospital to Byron Bay with a station at Cavanbah Centre .

Blanch’s bus service from Sunrise to Byron has low patronage. One morning the bus had one passenger but would no doubt pick up more on its way. The train had five passengers, with no stops before Byron town.

The Byron Train’s claim that the train would reduce the traffic on Ewingsdale road, made without any surveys whatsoever, can safely be disputed. At a generous estimate, there is an average of three cars parked near the station during train operations. Even if there were 20 cars parked there per hourly train trip [160 cars], this would have little effect on Ewingsdale Road’s 20,000 cars per day [RMS 2004].

In its second week of January 2018, Byron Train announced it had taken 10,000 passengers in 19 days. Assuming they didn’t include those riding free on the December 16, 2017 launch day, this works out to 32 passengers every trip. Go and watch the train’s. Thirty-two passengers is a rare occurrence.

I have travelled on the train many times. I observe passenger movements at the stations. I have never seen the train full (100 passengers). I have heard staff voice concerns about low patronage. If I reasonably estimate 20 passengers per trip for the seven-day service, 2,640 per week, at $3 per passenger, I get $411,840 income for the year. A train driver, with enormous passenger responsibility, earns around $95,000 per year. Byron Train has at least two professional drivers – that’s half the income used.

Maybe it’ll increase with the writers festival and other events. Or change the tickets to tourist prices, say $10 per trip, and then it’s $1.4M.

With its call for volunteers, low patronage, non-reduction of traffic on Ewingsdale Road, its claims to be a solar train, will the train be running in 2019? Or will it seek a government handout to keep its ‘public transport’ operating?

♦ Raphael Lee Cass is president of Sunrise Progress Association, who objected to the train.

4 responses to “Byron Train – a view on viability”

  1. Wayne Brown says:

    The train is here to stay Lee. It’s not going away. Get over it. Move on.

    The recent call for volunteers was merely an attempt to fill existing empty positions for volunteers, and the paid positions have already been filled.

    It is beyond time you and your small group moved on. The train is here to stay. The sooner you accept this fact the better.

    • Liz says:

      An informative and thought-provoking article, Lee. The train may indeed be here to stay, Wayne, but that doesn’t negate any of the points that are made here.

      Despite the fervour the venture has created in many that this is just the start of a rail/solar revolution, it is a novelty tourist train and assists travel between the industrial estate and the Shirley Street level crossing but is not serious public transport – unless I’m mistaken and this is the main journey on most people’s needs list. This is what needs to sink in with some excitable souls, who then need to move on.

      • Wayne Brown says:

        Liz, wether or not the train is public transport is not what I am talking about.

        My point is the small group of people still opposing the train after more than 3 years need to move on. It’s not like this train happened overnight. They have had over three years to voice their opinions, but now almost five months after the service has started, it’s beyond time to let it go and move on.

        • Allan says:

          Great reply Wayne. They do need to get over it and move on.

          Lee, if I’m not mistaken, aren’t you a frequent traveller on the train?

          Your facts are a little off too Lee. I’m sure all SEVEN fully qualified drivers would love to be getting $95,000 a year. But the facts are, they aren’t.

          Passenger numbers are also not your concern Lee. Why would it be? If you found a restaurant in Byron that was only getting 5 customers a night, would you go to all the effort of writing an article for the echo suggesting they close? No, because it’s their business. You should probably mind your own while your at it.

Leave a Reply to Allan Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Become a supporter of The Echo

A note from the editorial team

Some of The Echo’s editorial team: journalists Paul Bibby and Aslan Shand, editor Hans Lovejoy, photographer Jeff Dawson and Mandy Nolan

The Echo has never underestimated the intelligence and passion of its readers. In a world of corporate banality and predictability, The Echo has worked hard for more than 30 years to help keep Byron and the north coast unique with quality local journalism and creative ideas. We think this area needs more voices, reasoned analysis and ideas than just those provided by News Corp, lifestyle mags, Facebook groups and corporate newsletters.

The Echo is one hundred per cent locally owned and one hundred per cent independent. As you have probably gathered from what is happening in the media industry, it is not cheap to produce a weekly newspaper and a daily online news service of any quality.

We have always relied entirely on advertising to fund our operations, but often loyal readers who value our local, independent journalism have asked how they could help ensure our survival.

Any support you can provide to The Echo will make an enormous difference. You can make a one-off contribution or a monthly one. With your help, we can continue to support a better informed local community and a healthier democracy for another 30 years.”

Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers.