Tweed Council to engage community over hospital site

Artists impression of the proposed Tweed Hospital on selected site. Image from A Current Affair.

The choice of site for the new Tweed Valley Hospital has divided the community and raised questions over transparency, a lack of community consultation, and the fragmentation of state significant farmland.

Members of Relocate Tweed Valley Hospital From State Significant Farmland have highlighted a range of issues with the selected site.

Aside from their key claim that the site is state significant farmland, they point out that it is under a flight path which would limit use of emergency helicopters, and that road congestion would have a negative impact on Kingscliff residents and businesses.

Recognising the significant objections to both the site and process of site selection Health Infrastructure NSW, who are in charge of the development, have now responded to Tweed Council’s request for a reference group to consider site options for the new hospital.

Speaking to Echonetdaily Mayor Katie Milne saidThe state government have invited the council to join the Health Infrastructure NSW reference group, and for council staff to provide technical advice.’

‘We were really hoping to get some community members on the reference group but the state government haven’t offered that. Therefore, at council last night we voted to accept the offer – and all councillors have accepted the invitation to join the group.’

Council to engage in community consultation

In a bid to address the lack of direct community involvement in the reference group, Tweed Council have called for expressions of interest from the community to establish a community reference group.

‘This will allow councillors to get information from the community in relation to community preferences and to work through the very complex questions about the various hospital sites wit the community,’ Cr Milne said.


Meanwhile, Local Nationals member for Tweed, Geoff Provest has denied accusations that he supported attempts to re-zone the current proposed site.

Speaking to Echonetdaily he said that ‘the only time I have supported development in this area was for the site for a new police station, put forward by Labor, in 2008. It didn’t go ahead.’

Nonetheless Cr Milne said there seemed to be an element of land banking in the area – the practice of buying land as an investment and holding it for future use without specific plans for its development.

‘There are developers sitting on land and hoping for it to be re-zoned,’ said Cr Milne.

‘The state government classified this land as state significant farmland. I think the community holds that farmland dear. We’ve lost a lot of the farm land to development over the years. We lost 121 hectares at Terranora for residential development in 2004. Losing the farmland makes farming that much harder to be viable.

‘They’ve been trying to get it re-zoned but council and the community have fought it off. We see this as another attempt at re-zoning.’

Mr Provest said that the process of selecting the hospital site was a balancing act and that ‘the original site abuts the residential zone and experts say that this is the best site.’

‘However, If someone can come up with a site that is better I’d only be to happy to support it.’

Current hospital to close?

Mr Provest side-stepped questions over the closure of the current hospital.

When asked by a local campaigner to guarantee that the existing Tweed Heads Hospital would still provide primary health care once the new hospital opened, Mr Provest’s office said: ‘The new  hospital is designed to replace the existing facility’.

It continued, saying that ‘no consideration has yet been given by Health Infrastructure as to how the current site will be utilised – it may be sold or it may be redeveloped by NSW Health for other purposes but it will not be retained as a public hospital.

However, this was quickly clarified by Mr Provest.

He said that ‘the new hospital will replace the old in primary service delivery, and it makes sense to have all your health services co-located, there have been no decisions made by Health Infrastructure on what role the current hospital will play in service delivery. Everything is still in the planning stage.’

2 responses to “Tweed Council to engage community over hospital site”

  1. Christine Evans says:

    Very encouraged to read of councils involvement hopefully now there will be considered debate around a more appropriate location for the New Tweed Valley hospital.State Sinificant Farmland should never be considered for a development of this scale or any scale.It is insulting to Kingscliff residents not to be consulted when this would make such a huge social impact on our small seaside town.

  2. Diana Manwarring says:

    I’ve just come upon this article and am dismayed to learn that there has been little community input into a proposed site for the new hospital. As a past member of a local Health Council in another part of NSW I am also very disappointed to learn that there appears to be no Health Council. This Isco mon place in a number of Health districts across NSW and provided valuable input into proposed developments because it is a voluntary group that regularly consults with its local community..
    We are in the process of moving to Tweed Heads so find this information disappointing to say the least.
    Added to the negative impact of the decision regarding location is the issue of the loss of Farmland. How can it even be considered to allow this to happen. What is the point of the land being nominated as Significant if that category is deleted at a whim.

    Surely these concerns need to be taken more seriously. This is a sad story in my view that reflects poorly on the decision makers as being dismissive about community concerns.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Become a supporter of The Echo

A note from the editorial team

Some of The Echo’s editorial team: journalists Paul Bibby and Aslan Shand, editor Hans Lovejoy, photographer Jeff Dawson and Mandy Nolan

The Echo has never underestimated the intelligence and passion of its readers. In a world of corporate banality and predictability, The Echo has worked hard for more than 30 years to help keep Byron and the north coast unique with quality local journalism and creative ideas. We think this area needs more voices, reasoned analysis and ideas than just those provided by News Corp, lifestyle mags, Facebook groups and corporate newsletters.

The Echo is one hundred per cent locally owned and one hundred per cent independent. As you have probably gathered from what is happening in the media industry, it is not cheap to produce a weekly newspaper and a daily online news service of any quality.

We have always relied entirely on advertising to fund our operations, but often loyal readers who value our local, independent journalism have asked how they could help ensure our survival.

Any support you can provide to The Echo will make an enormous difference. You can make a one-off contribution or a monthly one. With your help, we can continue to support a better informed local community and a healthier democracy for another 30 years.”

Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers.