After the 2016 double-dissolution election (the one Malcolm Turnbull called to clean fringe dwellers like One Nation out of the senate) Pauline Hanson emerged with three followers.
Two of them, Malcolm Roberts in Queensland and Rod Culleton in Western Australia, were promptly rubbed out by the High Court. Roberts’s replacement, Fraser Anning, jumped ship as soon as he arrived, and Culleton’s replacement, Peter Giorgiou, arrived blinking in the sunlight with his leader last week looking as if he was not sure where he was but wished it wasn’t there.
Which leaves Brian Burston from New South Wales, but inevitably not for much longer. Burston is (or perhaps was) probably the sanest of all past and present One Nation senators, but that’s not saying much.
Presumably he is just as deluded as his leader (or perhaps former leader) about climate change, Asians, Moslems, and the ABC; and he is certainly a real patsy when it comes to negotiating on tax reform. He tells us proudly that he had a handshake agreement with Matthias Corman to deliver the corporate tax cuts the Finance Minister so desperately wants legislated and as a man of word his word he will honour his commitment.
This is all very worthy, but it does not excuse his naiveté in negotiating another of Pauline Hanson’s wish lists on the basis of Corman’s robotic assurances that the fabled Enterprise Tax Plan would actually deliver jobs, growth and wage rises.
As a small businessman himself, Burston should know the ugly reality: far from increasing employment, the tax cuts for small businesses – those under $150 million – have now been in place for more than two years and the outcome has been a paltry 0.9 per cent increase in jobs, compared to the rate of 2.3 per cent across all businesses – including the ones that did not get the cut.
If Burston ever goes back to being a small businessman, he should be very careful about Corman bursting through the door offering unmissable bargains in gold bricks, snake oil and the deeds to the Sydney Harbour Bridge.
So despite all the triumphalism over Malcolm Turnbull’s million jobs, including the 400,000 in the last financial year, the corporate tax cuts had nothing to do with it, if they were not actually counter-productive. Yet again, trickle down economics was exposed as a failure, as it has been so many times around the world.
If Burston ever goes back to being a small businessman, he should be very careful about Corman bursting through the door offering unmissable bargains in gold bricks, snake oil and the deeds to the Sydney Harbour Bridge. And while he is at it, he should surround the place with razor wire and savage guard dogs to prevent the hucksters of Newspoll setting him up for another pratfall.
According to The Australian (where else?) Burston’s desertion of Hanson’s decision to reject Corman’s deal was driven at least partly by the Newspoll of the preceding Monday, which announced breathlessly that 63 per cent of all voters wanted all the company tax cuts implemented in one form or another and 60 per cent of One Nation voters agreed with them.
This result seemed simply unbelievable, and on closer inspection it was simply unbelievable, because the polling question was deliberately and deceptively skewed to produce a positive result. Newspoll did not ask: ‘Do you support the government’s plan for a further $36 billion corporate tax cuts for businesses larger than $50 million?’ The answer, as has been repeatedly shown by more straightforward surveys, would be almost certainly have been no, which was not what Rupert Murdoch’s propaganda unit required.
So the question became not whether but when: would you like the tax cuts implemented immediately, or in stages? Of course, you may say: not at all, but that is very much the last option. What you really have to decide is whether you want them rammed home at once or eased in gradually. Unsurprisingly most said, in effect, if it has to happen, let’s get it over with.
Given the phrasing of the question, it is also likely that some respondents misunderstood it to include the personal tax cuts, which they may well favour. The question assumes its answer: if pollsters wanted a different result we might ask: did you want the government to give $36 billion of tax cuts to big business including the bastard banks, or would your prefer it spent on schools, hospitals and reducing the budget?
This Newspoll was not only worthless but consciously misleading but our national daily trumpeted it as yet another exclusive by the Liberal Party’s stenographer, Simon Benson. And in the process he managed to bury the real news that not only had Malcolm Turnbull lost his 33rd successive Newspoll, but the coalition had once again gone backwards.
Even by the abysmal standards of The Australian, this is bias and dishonesty on an extraordinary level. But apparently it helped sway Brian Burston: one more senate vote for Corman, but at the expense of irrevocably offending Pauline Hanson, who still has two of them. And in any case, Corman is still four short of the magic 39 he needs.
Obviously he wants all the help Murdoch is prepared to provide – which is apparently whatever it takes, given the blitzkrieg of last week. But it may not have helped much; in parliament Turnbull and his troops remained adamant that the key to success is to scream ever more loudly and incoherently about the horrors of Bill Shorten – by the time the next session ends we will no doubt be hearing from Peter Dutton that the opposition leader regularly shags pigs.
But the media was more interested in, successively, Barnaby Joyce, Michaelia Cash and Greg Hunt, all of whom provided the usual distractions and diversions for which the Turnbull government has become justly renowned. What the Newspoll actually showed was that the voters may cordially dislike Shorten but they continue to despair of Turnbull’s dysfunctional coalition. And the events of last week are unlikely to make them change their minds