21.7 C
Byron Shire
March 3, 2021

Byron bypass and its questionable Biodiversity Offsets Scheme 

Latest News

Forum to address housing emergency, March 8

A grassroots movement is bringing women, community and art together on International Women’s Day (March 8) in an urgent push to solve the local housing emergency. 

Other News

‘Hollywood’ drug squads over the top

I guess we have to thank Hollywood for the enduring myth that a black-clad squad of elite 'blokes', preferably with cool helicopters, from the capital are needed to crack down on really serious crime in hick parts of the country like Mullumbimby.

Entertainment in the Byron Shire and beyond for the week beginning 3 March, 2021

Entertainment in the Byron Shire and beyond for the week beginning 3 March, 2021

Constitutional referendum/poll for LG elections for Byron Shire?

Is the wards fight back again? Byron Shire Council staff have advised, in the upcoming agenda, that ‘Council may conduct a Constitutional referendum or poll in conjunction with the Local Government Election, to be held in September 2021’.

‘The Great Reset’

Gary Opit, Wooyung I appreciated the letter by Lucas Wright (17 February) on the Great Reset conspiracy fantasy. With our...

Random Mullumbimby breath test leads police to cannabis and ketamine

Police say that a random breath test in Mullumbimby has led to the seizure of cannabis and ketamine.

So you think you’d like to run for Council?

Residents considering running for Tweed Council can attend briefing sessions to find out about being a councillor ahead of local government elections.

Nationals candidate for Ballina Ben Franklin (L) and Byron Greens Mayor Simon Richardson pore over the plans for the contentious Byron Bay bypass, now fully funded. Photo Jeff Dawson

The recent Byron bypass funding announcement by the NSW Nationals was enthusiastically embraced by Greens mayor Simon Richardson, despite it being estimated to only alleviate traffic by around 20 per cent.

Yet closer examination of the Biodiversity Offsets Scheme that Council plans use to clear native vegetation at the southern end of Butler Street for the project has been criticised by legal public interest NGO, the NSW Environmental Defenders Office (EDO).

The Biodiversity Offsets Scheme is defined under the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016. That Act and others like it were examined by the NSW EDO before being introduced on August 25, 2017 by the NSW Liberal-National Coalition.

The laws replaced the previous BioBanking Scheme and other Acts, including the Native Vegetation Act 2003 and the Environmental Outcomes Assessment Methodology (EOAM).

That EOAM, according to the EDO, was ‘world class.’

Now there are ‘self-assessable codes, exemptions and discretionary clearing,’ according to EDO.

According to the office of environment and heritage’s (OEH) website, ‘The [Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016] is a key pillar of the NSW government’s framework for biodiversity assessment and management, together with the land management framework established in the Local Land Services Act 2013 (as amended by the Local Land Services Amendment Act 2016).’

The Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016, together with the Biodiversity Conservation Regulation 2017, outlines the framework for addressing impacts on biodiversity from development and clearing. It establishes a framework to avoid, minimise, and offset impacts on biodiversity from development through the Biodiversity Offsets Scheme.’

So how does it work?

According to OEH’s website, a proponent wishing to apply for the Biodiversity Offsets Scheme ‘must retain an accredited assessor’ and then apply the Biodiversity Assessment Method (BAM) to the proposal.

‘After applying the BAM, the accredited person will prepare a Biodiversity Assessment Report (BAR) that sets out how the proponent has applied steps to avoid and minimise impacts on biodiversity, and setting out the number and type of ecosystem and species credits required to offset residual impacts of the activity on biodiversity (‘credit obligation’). In the application for the development or clearing, the proponent can propose to meet the credit obligation using the variation rules rather than the like-for-like rules. The proponent must demonstrate that they have been unable to find like-for-like after completing required reasonable steps. The proponent may also seek to use “biodiversity conservation actions” as an alternative to retiring credits.’ 

Yet an analysis by the NSW EDO was critical of the Biodiversity Offsets Scheme methodology and its potential to ensure ecological safeguards.


In their 2016 submission prior to the environmental law overhaul, the NSW EDO said, ‘The proposed scheme is heavily reliant on “offsetting” biodiversity impacts (by managing other areas for biodiversity) rather than preventing the impacts, and adopts the standards of the problematic Major Projects Offsets Policy.’

‘The Biodiversity Assessment Methodology (BAM) is therefore significantly weakened; for example, direct “like-for-like” offsetting requirements are relaxed and can be circumvented.

‘The option to pay money in lieu of an actual offset will result in net loss of certain threatened species and communities. Offset areas and set-asides may be further offset later on rather than actually protected in perpetuity.’

‘The proposed regime places almost complete reliance on political, budgetary decisions (which may be short term) to achieve biodiversity gains, rather than on protections in the Bill to prevent continued biodiversity decline.

‘The NSW government has been unable to estimate how much landclearing will occur under the new relaxed system – in particular, how much clearing will occur under the new self-assessable codes.’

Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.


  1. OK, so, to build the BBB [Byron Bypass], NSW council [BSC] prior to 2016 had to comply with the BBS, NVA 2003, and the EOAM to protect environmental biodiversity.

    Now, with the introduction by the NSW LNC of the OEH’s 2016 legislation, although BSC will have to apply the BAM to the proposal and submit a BAR, the NSW NGO EDO has suggested that BSC is able to use OEH’s BOS or MPOP legislation which allows them to use AUD to offset the environmental damage, circumventing the need to actually protect biodiversity.

    Have I got that right…?


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Bangalow blackspot puts school children at risk

Will action ever be taken to protect school kids getting on and off the bus on Lismore Road, Bangalow as trucks fly by at 80km/h?

Lifting the lid on plans to build a retirement village in Ewingsdale

The letter sent to the residents of Ewingsdale last year by holiday park owner Ingenia seemed fairly innocuous at first glance...

Byron’s new road: the good and not so

After more than 30 years of talk, debate, disagreements, tears and political gridlock, Byron Bay has a new road to divert traffic from the CBD to the southern end of town.

Interview with Janet Swain

Janet Swain is 14. She’s in love with the tragic and brilliant cellist Jacquleine DuPré. But one day her mother arrives home with a bassoon.