28.8 C
Byron Shire
March 5, 2021

Decision pending on festival expansion plan

Latest News

New Greens team

Matthew O’Reilly President of CABS and a proud member of the NEW Byron Greens team It seems that some readers have...

Other News

Top of Mt Warning

Daniel O’Brien, Federal Letters about Mt Warning were interesting. Chris Gee defended National Parks and Wildlife for adopting the views of...

Heritage Bruns?

David Kolb, Brunswick Head When Mathew O’Reilly spoke to Council regarding heritage listing for parts of Brunswick Heads he was quoted...

Koala groups lobby Tweed MP Geoff Provest for action

Local koala groups have been taking action to protect NSW koalas by meeting with Tweed State Member of Parliament, Geoff Provest seeking his support for action on koala protections and asking him not to support the koala killing legislation his government are putting forward.

Taxpayers paying through the nose for the destruction of Casino to Murwillumbah train line

Louise Doran, Ocean Shores  On 14 January, 2015 The Echo comment ‘Railroaded’ quoted Don Page’s (Nationals then MP for Ballina) 2004...

TAFE job cuts not so bad, says Nationals MLC 

Ms Saffin said last week that 29 local jobs were going under restructures and that almost 700 frontline TAFE NSW jobs will be slashed.

Magic mushrooms

David Gilet, Byron Bay As noted in David Heilpern’s article (24 February), with drugs, whether medicinal or recreational, dosage is a...

Paul Bibby

A decision on the plan to significantly increase the size of Falls Festival and Splendour in The Grass is expected by the end of February, the Independent Planning Commission says.

In a short statement to Echonetdaily on Thursday, a spokesperson for the commission said it was ‘expected the determination will be finalised towards the end of this month’.

The decision will decide the fate of a proposal by the company which manages the North Byron Parklands festival site to significantly increase operations there.

Under the plan, the maximum number of patrons at Falls and Splendour in the Grass would be increased to 35,000 and 50,000 respectively, and both festivals would be allowed to run for five days.

There would also be three ‘medium event’ days per year, each with up to 25,000 patrons, five ‘small’ (5,000 patron) one-day community events and two ‘minor (1,500 patron) community events.

This would increase the total number of event days at the side from eight to 20.

The applicants are also proposing to build a conference centre on the site which would operate all year round.

The proposal is vociferously opposed by a collection of local residents groups who say it will lead to a dramatic increase in noise and traffic, and swamp surrounding towns such as Brunswick Heads with tourists.

But the company which manages the parklands rejects these claims, saying that all reasonable steps have been taken to limit the impact of the increase in operations on the community.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

2 COMMENTS

  1. ‘Taking all possible steps’? All possible steps would be relocating to a more suitable site and drastically reducing attendee numbers. Pity the collection of local residents groups doesn’t include the bulk of our councillors who took to the application with a wet tram ticket.

  2. Again I stress, that despite the negative social and environmental consequences of the present 8 days of festivals, the expansion will indeed increase the risk of a major catastrophe if there is a heavy or flooding rain during a festival,.

    The venue cannot handle such a storm event and in fact the site will rapidly flood and cannot be evacuated.

    To put it bluntly people will lose there lives and there will be serious injury,

    Up till now it is by sheer luck that the festivals have not been struck by a heavy rain, although a small storm a few years ago bought us Splendour in the Mud,

    Reliance on having good weather for festivals at this site in the era of unpredictable climate change is the height of irresponsibility.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Naming Ben Franklin

Cecily McGee, Mullumbimby It's very misleading for the Byron Shire Echo to repeatedly give Ben Franklin free media coverage,  as in the article about the Mullumbimby...

A little bit of COVID…

Mandy Nolan has stated in The Echo, ‘For 30 years I’ve fought to give a voice to the voiceless in our community, now I’m...

Democracy

Jo Faith, Newtown Thank you all at The Echo for upholding independent journalism. For readers and activists concerned about the demise of democracy, do take the...

Rape, the law, and naming the man responsible

David Heilpern tackles key questions relating to the allegation of rape by a cabinet minister.