11.9 C
Byron Shire
August 1, 2021

Government restricting health choices

Latest News

Byron beach erosion

Ann Tiernan, Suffolk Park I strongly disagree with Council’s position stated in last week’s Echo that ‘The sand (at Clarkes Beach)...

Other News

Magnificent sporting prowess and flag pride after 2021 NAIDOC

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people also shone in the sporting arena during NAIDOC 2021. 

Opportunities aplenty for young rugby standout

Ross Kendall Mullumbimby 16-year-old, Raife McKenzie, is a rising star rugby player who has had a big year after winning...

Knife-wielding criminal on the loose in Byron Bay

A terrifying media release is still on the loose in Byron Bay after escaping from the computers of Council candidates Rhett Holt and Cr Alan Hunter.  'It is a frightful to wake up at three in the morning to a man blood dripping with a backpack full of knives using your shower,' the [sic] release said...

Ballina Shire Council supports application for new croquet club

The Ballina Croquet Club is hoping to receive up to $300,000 in funding for a new club house at Cawarra Park. 

Bumbling Berejiklian

Keith Duncan, Pimlico The chooks have certainly come home to roost for the corruption riddled NSW government and ‘our’ scandal plagued...

To kill all Jews? No…

Subhi Awad, Mullumbimby With respect to Wakil and Macklin (Letters, 21 July) the assertion that the Palestinian resistance wants to kill...

Susan Garrad, Bangalow

From April 1, federal legislation will prevent private health insurers from offering rebates for a number of natural therapies, including naturopathy.

The 2.5 million Australians who see a naturopath as part of their healthcare program should be deeply concerned as natural therapies will be out of the reach of many without the rebate.

The value of naturopaths in promoting and supporting preventive illnesses has been proven repeatedly. A burgeoning public health budget (state and federal) is based largely on meeting the cost of the traditional medical model. The role natural therapies play in preventing ill health should be recognised and supported.

A number of attempts to represent the interests of naturopaths and their patients during this process have been made. To date letters to the federal minister for Health (Hunt) and the local federal member for Richmond, Justine Elliot, have gone unanswered.

If you support your local naturopaths/herbalists take the time to contact the Hon Greg Hunt and Ms Justine Elliot and urge them to review the new legislation and remove naturopathy from the prohibited list.

Your freedom to choose a healthcare model based upon a preventive focus is at stake.

Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.


  1. The governemnt is not restricting anyone’s right ot use so called natural therapies but on behalf all citizens it applies our public monies to those therapies which it is advised are beneficial to health. That advice comes from professionals in the Department of Health and related agencies who are both qualified and have the time, structural independence and resources to provide the best advice ot government. If you want to waste money on alternative therapies that they have not found worth funding that is you business, but don’t expect other people to subsidise your choices, and please do not apply political pressure on government to go against its own professional advice. .

  2. Few people probably understand what this legislation is done. The goal of the legislation was to remove the public subsidies from these practices, but they way they’ve implemented it (via a prohibitive list excluding these therapies from the Insurance Business Rules, in particular the rebate, hospital treatment and health management plan sections) has a ton of unintended flow-on effects.

    One of them is that those organisations accepting private health insurance cannot offer these services with rebatable services, even if the insurer is not paying for them. Our research centre at the University of Technology Sydney has already lost 3 existing projects as a direct result of these changes and we’ve had to stop discussions on any more, as organisations are no longer able to have any involvement with these therapies even for research purposes.

    This is in addition to the regulatory vacuum it creates (dodgy online providers are already advertising their courses with statements like “from April 1 you will no longer need a degree to practise” as insurers were the only regulators in this sector – it was why people were told to see if their practitioner was eligible for insurance, even if the patient didn’t have as it was the only standardised accreditation).

    All these stem not from the removal of subsidies (which would have had little impact – in fact our research shows people are far more likely to use these therapies *without* PHI than with it), but the implementation. These are now the only actively prohibited legal practices specifically prohibited by any Australian health law. We have long advocated that the policy could have been enacted very easily with a permissive list (i.e. a list of therapies that *could* be covered, as is the case for other areas such as allied health), or the Labor proposal of insurers reporting payments to the Department of Health and having the government payment to insurers manually adjusted.

    The way it is done, however, *does* restrict choice. It also makes it harder for patients to access these therapies where they are safe and effective, and it encourages them to access it in ways that are potentially harmful and ineffective. Whatever you think of the policy goal, the way they’ve implemented it is just a terrible, terrible misguided piece of legislation.

    Jo Wardle, Associate Professor of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

A day of ‘thank you’

Alison Drover, Broken Head How about a day of ‘thank you’ to our health workers and ‘sorry’ from our prime minister and ‘please’ from the community? Instead...

Nolan’s Soapbox

Duncan Shipley-Smith, Byron Bay The sinister suggestion by Nolan in last week’s Echo conflating anti-vaccination supporters with extreme right-wing ideology (XRW) demands a response. This is...

Shooting in Nimbin

There is a police operation currently underway in Nimbin following a shooting earlier today.

Knife-wielding criminal on the loose in Byron Bay

A terrifying media release is still on the loose in Byron Bay after escaping from the computers of Council candidates Rhett Holt and Cr Alan Hunter.  'It is a frightful to wake up at three in the morning to a man blood dripping with a backpack full of knives using your shower,' the [sic] release said...