9.6 C
Byron Shire
May 14, 2021

What are tiny homes the answer to?

Latest News

Michael Lyon elected as Byron Mayor

Owing to the resignation of former Mayor at the end of April, a vote was held today to replace Simon Richardson, until the next election

Other News

Flickerfest tour returns to the Northern Rivers

Celebrating 30 years in 2021 Flickerfest is bringing its National Tour to The Regent Cinema Murwillumbah for one big film packed this weekend

Global predicament

Dudley Leggett – Director of Sustainability Research Institute, Suffolk Park Phillip Frazer’s article, (Echo 6 January) is an excellent summary of...

Humans suck

Hannah Grace, Ocean Shores I heard on the local news late this afternoon (April 20) that a 370kg tuna ...

Free mental health workshop for Byron businesses

Business owners in Byron Shire are invited to attend a free 'Healthy Mindset' workshop aimed at providing them with resources and tools to improve mental health and wellbeing, as well as the opportunity to connect with other business owners.

War The Bloody Hell Are You?

When faced with potential conflict, why are we abandoning the strategy that’s worked in the past for one that will definitely fail?

Interview with Cyprien Clerc, Founder and managing Director of Futureseeds

Founder and Managing Director at FutureSeeds, Cyprien Clerc, talks to The Echo about this upcoming event.

Phil Anstey, Anstey Homes P/L, Casuarina

I read with interest, and some despair, the article (December 11) proposing tiny homes as an ‘affordable’ homes solution. The accompanying picture shows the limitations of this popular trend. The tiny home is a mobile solution best suited to emergency, short term, or tourist accommodation.

In NSW granny flats of up to 60m2 are a ‘permanent structure’ and offer better housing than a tiny home, whilst complying with the Building Code of Australia.

The lack of long term social cohesion and potentially inadequate lifestyle generated by clustering large numbers of random minimalist structures is not conducive to the health of our communities, social integration or to the occupants’ personal growth, in what inevitably are overcrowded sub-standard conditions.

The likelihood of ghetto style outcomes is very real in our monetarist based culture. We can do better than this. I have spent a lifetime designing smaller homes and group dwellings and I am prepared to liaise with and offer access to this body of work pro-bono to ‘not for profits’ or individuals in need.

Yes, we need local government to facilitate exemptions or modifications to what is allowable under their DCP and LEP provisions. This is ultimately controlled at State government level but wholesale changes to the Building Code of Australia are NOT needed and are unlikely to be approved in any great rush.

Yes, we need suitably identified land. We need an integrated design for a community that meets the needs of all occupants; a community not built around the car, but around people. We need an integrated social structure; old, young, wealthy, not so wealthy, families and singles (over 50 per cent of all households are two people or fewer).

So we need ‘smaller’ homes that feel like big homes that engage with the environment. Self powering, water efficient homes with water storage and waste management and with access to services, plus community gardens, workshops etc.

Regarding housing affordability, the problem does not rest in the ‘construction cost’ for homes. Building is always affordable, or can be, what is not affordable is the land. A base cost that is inflated (because it can be developed) plus council imposed contributions and infrastructure, all marked up from a total that includes huge bank loan interest rates PLUS a huge margin for the developer.

We need Council to access crown land or other low cost land devoid of ‘developer’ margins. We need a housing (rental) co-operative set up at the local level to oversee and own the project (and manage rental and emergency properties). This removes the ‘greed/profit’ motive.

We need sweat equity opportunities for part ownership of homes; we need guaranteed long term tenure for rental properties at ‘reasonable’ rentals. We need private ownership as well, both from the get go and as a transition during rental and, yes, we need emergency housing, as a transition.

The local community can do this, it just takes the will.

Previous articleLyon and the Snail
Next articleInterview with DJ Pob

Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Locals question placing homes in areas of inundation risk

It is where the community fought off Club Med and it is once again in the spotlight as the current owners, Elements, are seeking to have the zoning of the environmentally sensitive area in Bayshore Drive changed from tourism to residential

Go straight to the source on the Future Water Project

Rous County Council has announced a series of information days to be held this month where the community can ‘drop in’ and find out more about the revised draft Future Water Project 2060.

Free mental health workshop for Byron businesses

Business owners in Byron Shire are invited to attend a free 'Healthy Mindset' workshop aimed at providing them with resources and tools to improve mental health and wellbeing, as well as the opportunity to connect with other business owners.


Jillian Spring, Billinudgel In the article –  At a gathering of trainspotters, 21/4/21 by David Lisle, re Tweed Council Rail Trail, it is noted in...