21.9 C
Byron Shire
October 20, 2021

Yet another bleaching event hits Great Barrier Reef

Latest News

One million homes to provide affordable housing say The Greens

Local Greens candidate Mandy Nolan is looking to wrest the federal seat of Richmond from Labor to claim the balance of power in the next Federal government. To do it she needs a five per cent swing.

Other News

Editorial: Clear as a muddled government

Good news! Local police will not be actively enforcing the government’s Public Health (COVID-19 General) Order 2021 when it comes to business activity – see NSW govt’s Health Order lacks clarity.

Police call for busking ban, backed by Byron mayor

Have you noticed that the streets of Byron Bay have been a less tuneful and colourful place in the past week or so?

STP inches closer

Paul Bibby’s article ‘Ocean Shores STP (OS STP) inches closer to closure’ (6 October) raises some questions with me...

French hypocrisy

The French are understandably upset about being stabbed in the back by Australia’s sinking of the submarine contract. They...

More artists announced for Bluesfest

Bluesfest is excited to announce that, as NSW opens, they are adding more great artists to their lineup. 

So long Greens

So, where to now for Greens voters disillusioned with local MP Tamara Smith advocating the big pharmaceutical program? One would...

The back to back massive coral bleaching events of 2016 and 2017 devastated nearly half of the Great Barrier Reef.

Several conservation organisations are reporting that the Great Barrier Reef may have suffered yet another coral bleaching event, as climate change pushes water temperatures to dangerous levels. 

The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA), which recently revealed the Reef’s long-term outlook had deteriorated to ‘very poor’ for the first time ever, is expected to investigate possible bleaching in the north. 

Climate Councillor Professor Lesley Hughes asks how much more can the reef take? ‘The repeated insults to the reefs’ integrity are tragic.

Everybody has been predicting there would be more bleaching,’ said Professor Hughes. ‘This news is not a surprise, but it is tragic nonetheless.’

Iconic Reef may have taken another hit

Professor Hughes said that just when we thought Australia could not possibly be hit with any more climate-driven crises, our iconic Reef may have taken another hit. ‘Climate change, driven by the burning of fossil fuels, is the number one threat to our Reef, and I have seen it first-hand.’

The Great Barrier Reef suffered back-to-back bleaching in 2016 and 2017. The 2016 bleaching event was made 175 times more likely due to intensifying climate change. 

Climate change is not only threatening our Reef, but also the more than 60,000 workers and communities which depend on it and the $6 billion it contributes to the Australian economy. We must work to protect the tourism industry, which is already suffering at the hands of climate change,’ said Professor Hughes. 

We must urgently phase out coal, oil and gas to give the Reef a fighting chance of survival. It’s not too late but we must act now.

Australia has already lost so much this summer: people, places and wildlife. We can’t afford to lose a national icon,’ she said.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

9 COMMENTS

  1. Meanwhile bubbleboy ScoNO is happily rousting on The ALP for daring to publicly endorse ‘net zero emissions by 2050’. I’m no Reef expert but the way things are going I’d hazard a guess and say that Our Reef will be long gone before any ‘net zero’ target is attained.

  2. Obviously not a reef expert. Try Prof Peter Ridd who studied the reef for over 25years then you’ll understand all this is BS.

  3. David the mere mention of the expert scientist
    Professor Peter Ridd , will send the lovees
    In to meltdown! Yes david all will be revealed
    In the next 12 months regarding the Barrier reef
    Hysteria , Mr Ridd has exposed some very
    Inaccurate science .unfortunately this will cost the taxpayer’s almost 1 million, and the University in Question that is taking Mr Ridd to the Highest
    Court in the land and for What we ask ? This is on top of taxpayer grants given ..surely they would not
    Loss the funding . Thats what this is all about right !
    Hooked on taxpayer’s handouts! Win at any cost .

  4. Prof Ridd states categorically that we have an environmental problem. He DOES NOT say that climate science is BS. He DOES state that danger to the GBR is not as high a priority as some other areas, and especially not from land sediment, pesticides and a number of other alleged threats. Instead, he corrects what he sees as errors in others’ research in a field he has great expertise in and the hype that our media likes to stir up. His views about the conclusions reached in some papers has put him at odds with JCU. As for “very inaccurate science”, I say not really. The data obtained was done with very good science, it was the conclusions reached that Prof Ridd found erroneous. He then questioned the system which allowed the conclusions to be reached, that got him into trouble with his employer. Courts have since ruled that his dismissal was unfair.
    So is there really a problem with climate science, or is it with hierarchy and establishment that doesn’t like to be questioned?
    As for those calling for an end to taxpayer funds….how do you think Prof Ridd got funding for his scientific research in the first place?
    As for the reef and its longevity, well coral reefs have been around in Queensland for many millions of years and unless there in a mass extinction, they will be around for a long time to come.

  5. Professor Hughes consistently claims that burning fossil fuels is killing the reef with no evidence to support his ridiculous claims. He is on the climate change bandwagon using his qualifications to bamboozle the public with unsupported alarmist claptrap. Why didn’t bleaching occur in 2018 and 2019. It’s because coral bleaching happens and has always happened to some degree and he has been sitting at his desk for 3 years waiting for a report on a piece of bleached coral so that he can scream coral bleaching from the rooftops and get government funding for crazy projects that get him out of his office. Hughes contradicted the claims of many other scientists who studied the coral bleaching in 2016 and 2017 and who found that extra low el nino tides coinciding with a few very hot days was the real reason for coral bleaching. A common occurrence in Queensland.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Locals gathering to object to burning forests, plastic, foils, and tyres for energy at Condong sugar mill

A public protest is taking place this Friday meet near the Condong sugar mill, north of Murwillumbah, at the big fig tree on Tweed Valley Way on Friday, 22 October at 10am to object to the burning of trees and ‘forest waste’ by Cape Byron Power to generate electricity at the Condong sugar mill.

Looking for men with osteoarthritis of the knee

Pain from arthritis can be debilitating and ‘is the most frequent cause of disability among adults in the developed world,’ says Professor Stephen Myers from Southern Cross University (SCU).

Teacher vax

Dear teachers and community members. I have recently received an email from within my school community that asks me to place my name on...

Biz smashed by new COVID-19 regime

It was proudly trumpeted as ‘Freedom Day’ by the State Government. But for much of the local business community in the Northern Rivers region, October 11 was anything but.