11.5 C
Byron Shire
July 18, 2024

Byron Council needs to hear its critics, says former mayor, NSW MLC

Latest News

Regional ratios rollout NSW begins in Lismore

The NSW Nurses and Midwives’ Association (NSWNMA) has welcomed the announcement of nurse-to-patient ratios at two regional NSW hospitals but has expressed concern over the pace of the phased rollout.

Other News

Federal Labor funds Mullum hospital site masterplan  

A $263,000 federal grant has been awarded to Byron Shire Council for a masterplan and development strategy for the former Mullumbimby Hospital site.

Free coercive control community forum tonight in Kingscliff

What is coercive control? Is it really something we can define and work out how to respond to? The...

Crunch time in local rugby league

The Ballina Seagulls came away with a 12–12 draw, playing away against the Murwillumbah Mustangs last Saturday, which was...

A self-hating Jew

A self-hating Jew means ‘antisemite’. David Heilpern’s 3 July article was underpinned with lies, and hateful sentiments toward one...

Get their houses in order

Well David Heilpern may be discombobulated (Echo, July 3), but his use of the word Zionist as a derogatory...

We need to reinvent urban spaces to live in harmony with the planet 

Travel is about visiting someplace exotic, we’re told. Somewhere that looks, feels and tastes different, in a way that stirs our heart and stimulates our senses. But sit in the central business district of any global city today, and chances are it will look basically the same.

Jan Barham – It’s makes me feel so proud to be a member of an activist community who knows the value of standing up for what we believe in. Photo Tree Faerie.

Former mayor and NSW Greens MLC, Jan Barham, has called upon Byron Shire councillors to make public submissions during their meetings publicly available.

She told the chamber last Thursday morning that ‘the omission of the public access submissions from publication leaves huge gaps in the understanding of Council decisions.

‘Councillors often refer to issues raised in public submissions, but for the interested resident listening, we are left wondering what’s been said, and what information beyond the staff reports and the input of councillors is missing and influenced the outcome.’

She said that Council can vet contributions ‘if there is any belief that the presentation may include comments that cause any concern in relation to the Council publishing those comments.

‘I remind councillors that the courts found in the Ballina Council vs Bill Ringland case that residents have the right to criticise Council without fear of defamation. It may be uncomfortable at times for Council to hear some of the comments made, and yes, sometimes they might be critical of Council.

‘The decision in Ringland on appeal found that a statutory corporation cannot sue in defamation to protect its ‘governing reputation’.

‘Council’s reputation is not at risk by allowing other views to be heard, in fact Council should be appreciative of differing views as insight to review and ensure that it’s delivering good governance, and explaining its position well to residents.

‘In a democracy, community input should be valued. As a resident, I want to hear the comments of not only the elected representatives but also that of residents, who are the ones directly impacted by Council decisions.

‘I request that Council review its current practice of not publishing the audio recordings of public submissions, and make the voices of the community and applicants publicly available, to enhance our democracy and provide the openness and transparency that Council states it supports’.

Ms Barham’s submission was taken on notice by councillors.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

3 COMMENTS

  1. JAN WE ARE LUCKY TO HAVE YOU……you have been a tireless campaigner for open “government’ & free speech , along with transparency within Council. You have never given up , you have incredible integrity & resilience. WE ARE VERY GRATEFUL FOR YOUR ONGOING PERSISTENCE AND LOVE FOR THIS COMMUNITY. You have continually lobbied for residents to be able to hear all of the submissions presented & kept Council on their toes. This is a remarkable validation of your ethics and high moral standing. THANK YOU on behalf of myself & family, we so appreciate your honourable character and noble determination.

  2. I am actually somewhat confused by Jan’s stance here – BSC has public access sessions that are allocated an hour but nearly always run two hours and even up to three. These happen at both our planning and ordinary meetings. Its not behind closed doors, anyone can come and listen to people supporting or opposing agenda items, questioning, getting clarification an any issue,criticising us or staff or just venting. I don’t really know why they arent recorded for public access – though it is streamed live. Maybe is it so people can feel more free to speak their mind – but I can unequivically say it has nothing to do with councillors not wanting to hear our critics – that’s what we do, that is what we are there for – to listen.

  3. thanks Jeanette, I’m not sure what you are confused about as I had hoped it was quite clear. Yes council operates the Public Access sessions and yes if you are to attend you get to hear the community voice. The Covid situation does now stream public access and for that I am appreciative, it provides context. I’m referring to the ‘normal’ practice where audio of the council meeting is made available on the website, but not public access. I’m simply requesting that council adopt a practice of making the audio of Public Access (vetted if need be) available on the website also. I made no mention of councillors, I referred to Council, which is not specifically focussed on the elected representatives. This has come from listening to past audios to try and understand some of the decisions of council and references to public access are sometimes raised but as a listener, often have no idea what issues were raised. Also, listening to people is great, but it also requires Council to sometimes, take note, question and consider that sometimes those who make submissions have deeper, long term knowledge that should be respected. If you don’t know why it doesn’t happen, I appeal to you to question why not, and perhaps propose the change.
    I

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Healthy lifestyle program for Lismore and Tweed families

The Northern NSW Local Health District says that families can access support to build healthy habits together, including tips and assistance for getting active, healthy eating and overall wellbeing.

Artists donate work for Wallum cause

They say art imitates life, but can it also save life? This is the ultimate goal of the Save Wallum Art Exhibition and fundraiser that opened at Gallery Cosmosis in Byron Bay on Friday night.

850 women with sticks in Lismore and Ballina

The Goonellabah Hockey Centre and the Ballina Hockey Centre are about to be inundated with women and their big sticks as Lismore teams up with Ballina to host the NSW Northern Division Women's Masters Hockey Championships.

Macquarie Marshes under threat from mining

If it hasn't been hard enough protecting the Macquarie Marshes from drought because of the upstream cotton growers now farmers are faced with a new threat to this environmentally significant, Ramsar-listed area.