19.3 C
Byron Shire
April 20, 2024

Last chance for your say on revised West Byron DA

Latest News

Infrastructure for east end of Mullum

Mullumbimby was founded 135 years ago. In the 1960s sewerage was introduced, as was I suppose drainage infrastructure. Are...

Other News

Mayor defends promoting sale of Wallum lots

Is the role of mayor Michael Lyon as a negotiator with Wallum developers, Clarence Property, compromised? With talks with...

Man saved by Marine Rescue NSW after vessel capsized on Bruns Bar

A rapid response by Marine Rescue Brunswick volunteers has saved a man’s life after his 4.9 metre boat rolled on Brunswick Bar this morning.

Byron swimmer airlifted to hospital

A man swimming in Byron Bay on the weekend was airlifted to the Gold Coast University Hospital, rescuers said. 

Northern Rivers rugby league underway for 2024

Senior rugby league got off to a good start for the 2024 season with Byron Bay, Ballina and Mullumbimby teams picking up competition points.

Aid workers killed

I along with the Israeli and Jewish community in general mourn with the rest of the world for the...

Reclaiming childhood in the ‘device age’

A century and a half ago, the visionary Henry David Thoreau declared people had become ‘the tool of their tools.’  In this device-driven age of smartphones, social media, and artificial intelligence, few observations could be seen as more prescient. 

Some of the concessions made by Villa World in response to community concerns.

Dailan Pugh 

Villa World’s West Byron development is back, and until September 30 you can make a submission to Byron Council. It’s been badged as the Harvest Estate.

It will then be up to the court to decide whether to approve it. This may be your last chance to have a say on one of the two West Byron DAs. The other is owned by ‘locals’, Site R&D. 

A lot has happened in the West Byron saga since Villa World’s Development Application (DA) was rejected by the Northern Regional Planning Panel on April 8, 2019. 

First, the landowner, Tower Holdings, had to repay Villa World Ltd their $10 million deposit for an interest in the development, as it was dependent upon a successful DA.

Then Tower Holdings purchased the subsidiary Villa World Byron Pty Ltd so that they could appeal the rejection in the Land and Environment Court. 

In August, there was a court conciliation conference on the original DA, to which seven community members were allowed to submit short written statements. 

Now, Villa World Byron have submitted a revised DA to the court, which is on public exhibition until Wednesday September 30. 

There will be no extensions, and the court will determine the DA. 

Map of revised Villa World DA. Map by Dailan Pugh

By halving the size of their development, setting their development back 30m from Ewingsdale Road, excluding the habitat of the wallum froglets and removing development from the eastern koala area, Villa World have made a genuine attempt to address many of the community concerns. 

However, they can’t overcome the problems of increasing congestion on Ewingsdale Road, further stressing an already degraded estuary, and the vulnerability of the site to rising seas owing to climate heating. 

Villa World Byron have reduced the number of residential lots from 281 down to 145, with an additional 4 dwellings on large residual land parcels. Many of the original lots were intended for further subdivision and dual occupancies, giving an overall reduction in the maximum potential yield from 420 down to 179 primary dwellings. 

Under both scenarios, all lots are allowed to have secondary dwellings, significantly increasing the potential totals.

To ensure that there is no further development on the residual land parcels, Villa World have agreed to include perpetual legal restrictions over their use, and to work with Council to rezone them to a rural/environmental zone, though this needs an unequivocal commitment. 

This time, they applied RTA guidelines to identify the traffic generation for 149 dwellings as 1,490 additional vehicle movements per day (vpd) on Ewingsdale Road, though with allowances for dual occupancies and secondary dwellings, over 2,000 extra vpd could be expected.

This is relative to an existing traffic volume of some 21,000 vpd, which will also be increased by the adjacent Site R&D development. 

After vainly battling the Department of Planning and Byron Council, for years, to get a setback from Ewingsdale Road for aesthetic reasons, Villa World’s replacement of the concrete wall with a landscaped 30m setback is welcomed.

Villa World’s abandonment of the eastern part of their development is good for this vital koala corridor (and bushfire safety), though this would be enhanced if revegetation was targeted around the core koala habitat in this vicinity (mostly on Site R&D land).

The removal of development from the western drainage line and wetland home of the vulnerable wallum sedgefrog is a relief, as the previous intent was to bury these under up to 3m of fill and houses. 

Bigger buffers needed under revised Villa World DA.

Bigger buffers needed

However, there needs to be a bigger buffer to the wetland, and improvements to the drainage system, to increase their chances of surviving this DA.

Flood impacts still rely on Council’s fundamentally flawed and inaccurate 2015 study. Most significantly, that study only considers a maximum sea level rise of 0.8m by the end of this century, with the real risk of a 1–2m rise ignored. 

While there is reduced development of floodprone land, there has been an unexplained increase in the depth of fill by over a metre in places, resulting in an increase in imported fill from 186,040m3 to 215,000m3

An additional 2,900 truck loads is not trivial.

With secondary dwellings, this development can be expected to house over 500 people, consuming over 35 megalitres of water from Rocky Creek Dam each year. 

What isn’t evaporated ends up in coastal wetlands and the Cape Byron Marine Park as overland flow, groundwater seepage or discharge from the sewerage treatment plant, along with a large variety of added pollutants. 

The drainage of acid sulfate soils and polluted groundwater will add sulphuric acid and a cocktail of iron, aluminium and heavy metals to the mix.

While we know the Belongil estuary is already badly polluted and in dire need of remediation, there has still been no attempt to assess the health of its waters and biota. 

This is essential to identifying the additional impact of this development on an already severely stressed system. 

The intent to undertake limited monitoring after it is developed is too little, too late.

The adjoining Site R&D DA is listed for a court hearing between November 9 and 13, 2020, though now that Villa World have abandoned the western roads that Site R&D depended upon, they will need to change their DA again. 

Holistic assessments accounting for the impacts of both developments on traffic and the estuary are still needed.

Byron Resident’s Group statement

Meanwhile, The Byron Resident’s Group (BRG) are calling on the public to make their voice heard by Wednesday September 30.

They said in a press release that urgent action is needed:

  • The Villa World Development Application (DA) was refused by the Northern Regional Planning Panel in April 2019.
  • It has ended up in the Land and Environment Court and is out of the hands of Council to decide.
  • Villa World Byron submitted a revised and completely new DA to the court in August, which was put on exhibition for only 3 weeks
  • Submissions close next Wednesday 30 September.
  • We have only days left to respond to this completely new DA (link to the 93 documents here)
  • The court will determine the DA, not Council, so there will be no public meetings, no chance to speak and no opportunity to change the outcome.
  • Any issues we have with this new development must be brought to the court’s attention now via our submissions.
  • You should mention in your submission that being given three weeks to consider 93 documents – including stormwater, flooding and sewage studies —  for a development that will have profound impacts on Byron Bay is grossly unfair and denies the community genuine participation in the planning process. 

• Belongil And Cape Byron Marine Park – water flowing through the already polluted site combined with increased urban and acid-sulfate run off plus the additional load of sewerage effluent will put more strain on the already degraded Belongil Creek – a breeding ground for fish – and flow to into our precious Bay, part of Cape Byron Marine Park.

• Flood impacts – the DA relies on Council’s 2015 flood study, which only considers a maximum sea-level rise of 0.8 m by the end of this century when a 1-2m rise is more likely. Is it appropriate to fill and build on a flood plain when the resulting houses are vulnerable to future risk?

• No masterplan or co-ordination of the whole West Byron urban release area – the two landowner groups, Site R&D and Villa World Byron Bay, are not working in co-ordination. There is no connectivity across the site and the cumulative impacts cannot be assessed.

• Traffic – increasing congestion by adding 2800+ extra car movements per day onto a roundabout and then onto Ewingsdale Road.

If you want to look at all the documents in the da click here (Beware – it’s 817Mbs)

Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.


  1. Developers MUST be forced to build estates that take into account wildlife and flora that is indigenous to the area.

    I do not see how a developer can say they are state of the art etc., when all they are doing is squeezing as many properties into the land available for the maximum profit.

    I am not against developers making profits, however it should not be proft instead of helping nature.

    Both housing developments and our natural environment can co-exist. Developers are just not interested in the latter.

  2. Absolutely out of character and place, I cant afford to live in the area, however I am happy for those who can. However this is just greed and destruction and Byron cant cope with any more mega developments including oversized Hotels (re Woolworths site).

    I love (sic) the arrogance that they even try it. The ratepayers money is hardly enough to fight them, and the developers know it.

  3. With secondary dwellings, this development can be expected to house over 500 people. Then there’s the probably large percentage bought as investment. The resultant Air B&Bs will add considerably more people and traffic.

  4. Moan moan moan…the developers handed the whole concept to the council including Richardson and Barham back in 2008 to make their contribution how best it should be developed and they spat it back into the consortiums face. Now it’ll cost what another $400,000 to run it thru court and they’ll lose that one? Tough for everyone whose roads and infrastructures are fckd and badly in need of repair.

  5. No they did not hand the whole concept to Byron Council – the state govt adopted it as an urban expansion area without any input from council, and without any reference to any existing council urban planning or identified housing needs or floodplain issues or even the State govts own North Coast Strategy.. Good on the community who have got this to this point where the developers have now reduced the size of the development, but building on a floodplain on a site adjacent to a Nature Reserve? Hopefully the last push to stop this. Keep on “moaning”!!!


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Save Wallum now

The Save Wallum campaign has been ongoing and a strong presence of concerned conservationists are on site at Brunswick Heads. How the state planning...

Can Council’s overturn their decisions?

NSW Labor planning minister, Paul Scully, when asked about the Wallum estate by local MP Tamara Smith (Greens)  in parliament on March 20, said,...

The bridges of Ballina Council

Ballina Shire Council has started preliminary investigation works at Fishery Creek Bridge, on River Street, and Canal Bridge, on Tamarind Drive, as part of their plan to duplicate both bridges.

Tweed Council wants your ideas on future sports facilities

Tweed Council is looking for feedback from residents about future plans for sport and recreation in the area.