19.3 C
Byron Shire
April 20, 2024

DA approval raises concerns over landslips and flooding

Latest News

Infrastructure for east end of Mullum

Mullumbimby was founded 135 years ago. In the 1960s sewerage was introduced, as was I suppose drainage infrastructure. Are...

Other News

Northern Rivers Recovery and Resilience Program announces 36 projects

Bridge expansions, upgraded pumps, enhanced evacuation routes and nature-based projects are just a few of the 36 projects being...

Anti-Israel bias

Many locals have approached me to say how shocked they are at the extreme anti-Israel bias that is expressed...

Mandy Nolan’s Soapbox: Shopping Centres Scare Me

I feel trapped. There isn’t a single time I attend where I don’t check my proximity to the exits, or imagine what I’d do if there was a fire, or worse, a shooter. The sense of being enclosed is unnatural, I can’t tell what time of day it is, I lose my sense of direction. It’s designed to be disorienting. It feels otherworldly. And never in a good way. They are designed to make you stay longer. They are by design, disorienting.

Byron swimmer airlifted to hospital

A man swimming in Byron Bay on the weekend was airlifted to the Gold Coast University Hospital, rescuers said. 

Reef snapshot details widespread coral bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef

Latest CSIRO research shows that the fifth major bleaching event since 2016 is still unfolding, but bleaching was just one of the disturbances on the reef over summer.

A festival in laneways

Mullumbimby, a town known for its abundance of artists and creatives with a passion for what drives them, is set to host the much-anticipated Laneways Festival 2024 on May 4 and 5.

Callum Sked’s proposal, if approved, would dramatically increase the density of the area. Image from DA.

Aslan Shand

Council’s willingness to defend residents’ amenity and properties has been raised by concerned locals and residents following the outcome of the land and environment court (L&EC) case in Bian Court, Ocean Shores.

The proposal by developer Callum Sked to consolidate and develop three large lots, by adding eight townhouses between the three existing dwellings, went to the L&EC for a second time (after an earlier deemed refusal) with a decision made on 15 January 2021 to approve the development.

Issues raised as major concerns for local residents included the history of landslips, and that existing flooding of dwellings downhill of the site would be exacerbated, as well as issues around stormwater management as well as changing the low density character of the area.

‘A house was previously lost in a landslip in the same valley and there are two houses that are currently having issues in relation to landslips. The amount of mud and dirt washing down into the street when it rains is concerning,’ said local resident, Paul Wilsher.

As previously reported in The Echo when the developer had originally put in the DA he failed to examine a wide range of issues including getting a geotechnical report.

Mr Wilsher explained that while the development application (DA) was always ostensibly compliant in relation to measurements for planning regulations, the developer was furnishing new documents up till, and on the day, of the hearing.

‘I suppose it is the court process that I am more disappointed with,’ Mr Wilsher told The Echo.

‘I know the private planning consultant they (Council) hired was good but he didn’t get a chance to speak very much. I thought Council should have called an expert witness on stormwater, drainage and landslips and more experienced arborist/ecologists. At one stage the expert the council was using said “I am not actually experienced at that, I will have to defer to the expert from the other side”.

‘All the issues that were raised in the court to do with drainage, stormwater, and landslips that was discussed on the first day seemed to disappear overnight in discussions between engineers, and we still have no indication if these issues have been adequately resolved.’

While Greens mayoral candidate and former councillor, Duncan Dey, praised council for defending the case in the L&EC, he said that ‘Council staff and consultants defending the case seem to think their job is to find a way through, rather than to say “No”. To them, saying “No” will just mean another court case. Cashed up developers use this tiring process to win.’

Last minute documents

‘One of the dodgiest aspects of L&E Court processes is that the Court accepts revisions of the proposal right up to and during the hearing. This compounds the exhaustion of the defence team as they often have to drop everything and start fresh assessments. They can finish up either guessing or acquiescing.

‘L&E Court arrangements are set up by state legislation & regulation, and interpreted by commissioners with middle-class “status quo” values. Status quo in development is the philosophy, since settlement, that the landscape is empty and therefore available to be filled in.

‘I was engaged by the neighbours in my professional capacity as a hydrologist to analyse the impacts of the various proposals on stormwater and flooding, which is already a problem in this micro-valley now to be converted from grass-scape to steel and concrete. Properties downstream of the site already flood. I cannot see how the stormwater issue could have been resolved other than by exhaustion of the parties.’

Over the past five years Council has spent only $2 million on legal costs with the allegation that Council is actively seeking to avoid court cases and are willing to accept less than ideal outcomes for residents as a result. This is certainly reflected in Council meetings where a decision often hinges on the advice about whether it will open the Council up to a court challenge.

Responding to questions on the case Mayor Simon Richardson told The Echo that, ‘Staff working with proponents to seek an outcome occurs in a L&EC regardless of which avenue the DA took to get to the L&EC. It is a matter of course that the L&ECwould require parties to try and find a mediated way forward to avoid costs and court time… as it goes to court, Council prepares and if compromises can’t be reached, we continue, until a conclusion, and incur the costs that result.’


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

5 COMMENTS

  1. I’m sorry to hear this Callum and proponents, but you have acted and continue to act in what I consider a very inappropriate manner by pushing this through the Land and Environment Court to get your way. That you were raised here one would hope you would have retained more empathy in your approach. Thinking about anyone else who may be affected in my opinion you should have changed coarse as soon as your group realised the history of the area around this site, and should not have pushed through this development with full knowledge of this areas history relating to massive land slips and your neighbour’s continued flooding issues. If you go ahead, and foreseeable damage does occur, each individual in your group should be held accountable for all costs involved with any and all future damage to homes and harmed individuals around this development including post traumatic stress, injury, replacement/alternative land and homes as well as emergency housing when it happens. If you are not content with putting your hands up in writing that you will do this if and when it happens, than in my opinion you should retract this development application immediately

  2. Disgusting, but situation normal. Never mind the environment or existing occupants, development at all costs.
    Terra Nullius strikes again.
    Engineers and experts have to have time to process all information presented and prepare accurate reports, so allowing last minute revisions is very prejudicial to proper and equitable decision making.
    Obviously this is used by developers as a shamelessly perjorative way to prevent the courts to evaluate cases on their true merits.
    Also – why is council not contracting experts with the necessary competencies?

  3. This is a great story. Well balanced and good journalism.
    As anyone versed in Ocean Shores life would know, it’s been a giant ‘council’ balls up since the early days with many bucks passed and spent in courts to resolve issues.
    If humans were truly that…..issues would be resolved easily.

  4. So it seems our local (council) elected representatives are powerless to hold back inappropriate development even if they want to. Our state representatives have created unelected bodies that appear unable to prevent inappropriate development.
    What do we do? Educate potential buyers of this development and others like it. Create an environment where your treated as a social outcast if you are party to wrecking community. It seems harsh, highlighting individual participation and responsibility in the development process, but the ethical and moral reality is as an individual if you buy it, your a part of the problem. Will you be a part of community or shunned for wrecking it. We can’t rely on developers to do the right thing. Buyer beware!

  5. Change the law is the best answer. Empower Councils to decide on DA’s not the L&EC. Don’t allow last-minute changes to be tabled in Court. Make sure that engineering reports and geotechnical reports are objective.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Save Wallum now

The Save Wallum campaign has been ongoing and a strong presence of concerned conservationists are on site at Brunswick Heads. How the state planning...

Can Council’s overturn their decisions?

NSW Labor planning minister, Paul Scully, when asked about the Wallum estate by local MP Tamara Smith (Greens)  in parliament on March 20, said,...

The bridges of Ballina Council

Ballina Shire Council has started preliminary investigation works at Fishery Creek Bridge, on River Street, and Canal Bridge, on Tamarind Drive, as part of their plan to duplicate both bridges.

Tweed Council wants your ideas on future sports facilities

Tweed Council is looking for feedback from residents about future plans for sport and recreation in the area.