21.2 C
Byron Shire
October 28, 2021

DA approval raises concerns over landslips and flooding

Latest News

The time for climate action has come – today protect Styx Valley

The Bob Brown Foundation has returned to Tasmania’s native forests frontline with a commitment to defend critical carbon-storehouses while the government contributes to the global climate and extinction crises.

Other News

Two views of animal welfare on the Tweed

Local MP Justine Elliot recently announced that an Albanese Labor Government will invest $1 million to build the new animal pound and rehoming centre at Lundberg Drive, South Murwillumbah.

Ben Smith leaving Ballina Council

The unique contributions of current Deputy Mayor Ben Smith to Ballina Shire Council are coming to an end, as he's decided to hang up his councillor hat after thirteen years, and not contest the December election.

Cacao wow

After ten years of wholesale trading from their small factory, Byron Bay Cacao’s stunning new retail space is now...

I’m back!

Over the past few weeks I’ve stayed out of the limelight in order to rest for the election campaign,...

Mary’s Place receives welcome boost in Ballina

One of the major recipients of Ballina RSL's latest round of ClubGRANTS is Mary's Place, a drop-in centre and support service for homeless people and travellers in the area, supported by Vinnies.

Cr Darlene Cook: ‘working to restore accountability and trust in our Council’

Current Lismore Councillor Darlene Cook has served one term on Lismore Council and at the December LGA election, she plans to run for Mayor.

Callum Sked’s proposal, if approved, would dramatically increase the density of the area. Image from DA.

Aslan Shand

Council’s willingness to defend residents’ amenity and properties has been raised by concerned locals and residents following the outcome of the land and environment court (L&EC) case in Bian Court, Ocean Shores.

The proposal by developer Callum Sked to consolidate and develop three large lots, by adding eight townhouses between the three existing dwellings, went to the L&EC for a second time (after an earlier deemed refusal) with a decision made on 15 January 2021 to approve the development.

Issues raised as major concerns for local residents included the history of landslips, and that existing flooding of dwellings downhill of the site would be exacerbated, as well as issues around stormwater management as well as changing the low density character of the area.

‘A house was previously lost in a landslip in the same valley and there are two houses that are currently having issues in relation to landslips. The amount of mud and dirt washing down into the street when it rains is concerning,’ said local resident, Paul Wilsher.

As previously reported in The Echo when the developer had originally put in the DA he failed to examine a wide range of issues including getting a geotechnical report.

Mr Wilsher explained that while the development application (DA) was always ostensibly compliant in relation to measurements for planning regulations, the developer was furnishing new documents up till, and on the day, of the hearing.

‘I suppose it is the court process that I am more disappointed with,’ Mr Wilsher told The Echo.

‘I know the private planning consultant they (Council) hired was good but he didn’t get a chance to speak very much. I thought Council should have called an expert witness on stormwater, drainage and landslips and more experienced arborist/ecologists. At one stage the expert the council was using said “I am not actually experienced at that, I will have to defer to the expert from the other side”.

‘All the issues that were raised in the court to do with drainage, stormwater, and landslips that was discussed on the first day seemed to disappear overnight in discussions between engineers, and we still have no indication if these issues have been adequately resolved.’

While Greens mayoral candidate and former councillor, Duncan Dey, praised council for defending the case in the L&EC, he said that ‘Council staff and consultants defending the case seem to think their job is to find a way through, rather than to say “No”. To them, saying “No” will just mean another court case. Cashed up developers use this tiring process to win.’

Last minute documents

‘One of the dodgiest aspects of L&E Court processes is that the Court accepts revisions of the proposal right up to and during the hearing. This compounds the exhaustion of the defence team as they often have to drop everything and start fresh assessments. They can finish up either guessing or acquiescing.

‘L&E Court arrangements are set up by state legislation & regulation, and interpreted by commissioners with middle-class “status quo” values. Status quo in development is the philosophy, since settlement, that the landscape is empty and therefore available to be filled in.

‘I was engaged by the neighbours in my professional capacity as a hydrologist to analyse the impacts of the various proposals on stormwater and flooding, which is already a problem in this micro-valley now to be converted from grass-scape to steel and concrete. Properties downstream of the site already flood. I cannot see how the stormwater issue could have been resolved other than by exhaustion of the parties.’

Over the past five years Council has spent only $2 million on legal costs with the allegation that Council is actively seeking to avoid court cases and are willing to accept less than ideal outcomes for residents as a result. This is certainly reflected in Council meetings where a decision often hinges on the advice about whether it will open the Council up to a court challenge.

Responding to questions on the case Mayor Simon Richardson told The Echo that, ‘Staff working with proponents to seek an outcome occurs in a L&EC regardless of which avenue the DA took to get to the L&EC. It is a matter of course that the L&ECwould require parties to try and find a mediated way forward to avoid costs and court time… as it goes to court, Council prepares and if compromises can’t be reached, we continue, until a conclusion, and incur the costs that result.’


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

5 COMMENTS

  1. I’m sorry to hear this Callum and proponents, but you have acted and continue to act in what I consider a very inappropriate manner by pushing this through the Land and Environment Court to get your way. That you were raised here one would hope you would have retained more empathy in your approach. Thinking about anyone else who may be affected in my opinion you should have changed coarse as soon as your group realised the history of the area around this site, and should not have pushed through this development with full knowledge of this areas history relating to massive land slips and your neighbour’s continued flooding issues. If you go ahead, and foreseeable damage does occur, each individual in your group should be held accountable for all costs involved with any and all future damage to homes and harmed individuals around this development including post traumatic stress, injury, replacement/alternative land and homes as well as emergency housing when it happens. If you are not content with putting your hands up in writing that you will do this if and when it happens, than in my opinion you should retract this development application immediately

  2. Disgusting, but situation normal. Never mind the environment or existing occupants, development at all costs.
    Terra Nullius strikes again.
    Engineers and experts have to have time to process all information presented and prepare accurate reports, so allowing last minute revisions is very prejudicial to proper and equitable decision making.
    Obviously this is used by developers as a shamelessly perjorative way to prevent the courts to evaluate cases on their true merits.
    Also – why is council not contracting experts with the necessary competencies?

  3. This is a great story. Well balanced and good journalism.
    As anyone versed in Ocean Shores life would know, it’s been a giant ‘council’ balls up since the early days with many bucks passed and spent in courts to resolve issues.
    If humans were truly that…..issues would be resolved easily.

  4. So it seems our local (council) elected representatives are powerless to hold back inappropriate development even if they want to. Our state representatives have created unelected bodies that appear unable to prevent inappropriate development.
    What do we do? Educate potential buyers of this development and others like it. Create an environment where your treated as a social outcast if you are party to wrecking community. It seems harsh, highlighting individual participation and responsibility in the development process, but the ethical and moral reality is as an individual if you buy it, your a part of the problem. Will you be a part of community or shunned for wrecking it. We can’t rely on developers to do the right thing. Buyer beware!

  5. Change the law is the best answer. Empower Councils to decide on DA’s not the L&EC. Don’t allow last-minute changes to be tabled in Court. Make sure that engineering reports and geotechnical reports are objective.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Does Casino want to live with a thermal waste ‘solution’?

The residents of the Richmond Valley LGA have had seven weeks to simmer over the possibility of a waste incinerator coming to town. At the...

Dangerous driving and assault – Tugun

Police are appealing for information regarding an alleged assault at the Pacific Motorway, Tugun on September 25.

Do COVID vaccines affect male fertility?

Vaccines do have side effects, but there are some social-media users peddling myths that COVID-19 vaccines cause male infertility and sexual dysfunction.

Another Lismore COVID case

Lismore has seen one new case of COVID-19 reported in the 24 hours to 8pm 26 October.