9.6 C
Byron Shire
May 14, 2021

Byron Shire Mayor, staff mute over Council court loss

Latest News

Michael Lyon elected as Byron Mayor

Owing to the resignation of former Mayor at the end of April, a vote was held today to replace Simon Richardson, until the next election

Other News

Remembering Bentley

Saturday 15 May is the seventh anniversary of Victory Day at the historic Bentley Blockade, just west of Lismore.

Water and the dam

Dr Roslyn Irwin, Caniaba An organisation called ‘Our Future NR’ is distributing and promoting information intended to put the Dunoon...

Deep listening and housing ideas under Mullum’s fig trees for Renew Fest

Around a hundred presenters, musicians, other artists and community activators plus a bumper crowd of punters all came together under the fig trees at the Mullumbimby Showground over the weekend for Renew Fest 2021.

Doing it right

How do you know you’re doing hummus right? When the international visitors tell you it’s some of the best...

Comparisons

Gareth Smith, Byron Bay Trade Minister Dan Tehan wants to refer China to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) because he...

Govt’s new housing plan fails to impress local reps

Local government representatives on the Northern Rivers have expressed doubts over the state government’s new Housing 2041 Strategy.

Hans Lovejoy

Byron Mayor, Simon Richardson (Greens), is again remaining mute over questions around Council’s court loss, this time over a fencing dispute in Suffolk Park.

Similarly, staff are yet to reply to questions around the court loss, and whether they plan to strengthen the LEP to ensure clarity around residential amenity. 

It comes after Council lost in court against a developer over the consolidation of three large lots in Ocean Shores, despite a large, unanimous neighbourhood opposition and sensitive environmental issues. 

Development Control Order overturned

Napoli v Byron Shire Council [2020] NSWLEC 1646 was handed down on December 15, 2020, and was a result of the landowner taking Council to court after staff imposed a Development Control Order over a high fence being erected.

In summarising her judgment, Acting Commissioner, Sue Morris, said that Council’s order should be revoked, given that the structure was not inconsistent with the development consent. She said that ‘Council did not provide any evidence’ to the contrary [regarding] claims by the property owner’.

Independent Cr Basil Cameron told The Echo, the court’s decision ‘can be characterised as turning on administrative issues rather than planning principles.’

Cr Cameron said, ‘Acting Commissioner Morris stated that she understood “the concerns of the objectors regarding height, scale and bulk”, however her “role in this appeal is not to assess the merits of the structure”.’

Cr Cameron continued, ‘Council can not change the regulations, but it can adapt to the changes in the regulations that occurred between the original consent and the issuing of a Construction Certificate’.

‘An understanding of current law and evidentiary requirements needs to be applied when deciding whether to issue a Development Control Order’.

Meanwhile, Matthew O’Reilly, who is standing for Council in September, told The Echo, ‘My understanding of this L&EC proceeding is that it was not really the fault of the compliance staff’. 

‘It was the fault of the development approval (DA) staff, as they approved a DA with vague conditions of consent that were open to interpretation by the private certifiers.

‘This is just another case where DA approvals are not handled properly.

‘Conditions of consent and stamped plans need to be tight and not open to interpretation. This happens far too often.

‘If DA conditions of consent were handled better then compliance staff would have a much easier job enforcing compliance’.

Duncan Dey, who is also running for Council later this year, told The Echo, ‘Privacy and fence heights are huge issues in the urban landscape, and are now creeping out into the rural landscape as well.

‘There is no doubt a fence with “effective height 3.5m” will impact on neighbour’s amenity. That should have been addressed when the fence was (or wasn’t) approved. The issues are articulated well by the neighbours in point 16 in the case report. As usual, the objectors are on top of the matter.

‘I have not seen the site, but I can’t understand how fundamentals like the 900mm setback and not attaching the 3.5m high screen to the 1.8m boundary fence got ignored by the court.

‘The private certifier argues at point 27: “The posts have been bolted into the timber fence which gives added structural integrity to both the fence and the screen but particularly the fence”. 

‘This is simply wrong and should have been challenged. The shared timber boundary fence will be a nightmare to replace, when one day necessary’.

Mr Dey continued, ‘What a pity. The neighbours get done over, yet again. Because the development process is deeply flawed in favour of building new stuff, Council should take more care along the way: if the extreme height fence had never been approved, the court case would not have happened’.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Locals question placing homes in areas of inundation risk

It is where the community fought off Club Med and it is once again in the spotlight as the current owners, Elements, are seeking to have the zoning of the environmentally sensitive area in Bayshore Drive changed from tourism to residential

Go straight to the source on the Future Water Project

Rous County Council has announced a series of information days to be held this month where the community can ‘drop in’ and find out more about the revised draft Future Water Project 2060.

Free mental health workshop for Byron businesses

Business owners in Byron Shire are invited to attend a free 'Healthy Mindset' workshop aimed at providing them with resources and tools to improve mental health and wellbeing, as well as the opportunity to connect with other business owners.

Trainspotters

Jillian Spring, Billinudgel In the article –  At a gathering of trainspotters, 21/4/21 by David Lisle, re Tweed Council Rail Trail, it is noted in...