18.2 C
Byron Shire
April 20, 2024

Green is just a colour

Latest News

Infrastructure for east end of Mullum

Mullumbimby was founded 135 years ago. In the 1960s sewerage was introduced, as was I suppose drainage infrastructure. Are...

Other News

Infrastructure for east end of Mullum

Mullumbimby was founded 135 years ago. In the 1960s sewerage was introduced, as was I suppose drainage infrastructure. Are...

Rural roads need a path to recovery

The recent and continuing rains have turned many of our roads into a sodden mud puddle and the NSW Farmers have renewed calls for real action on road infrastructure funding after continual damage on roads and bridges across the state.

We wonder why

Living in Byron Shire the majority of people continue to ask why is this organisation continuously letting this community...

Transgender rights

Mandy Nolan might be surprised to discover how many women of all political persuasions, feminists or not, are alarmed...

Antisemitic racism

It takes the death of an Aussie, Zomi Frankcom, to remind Prime Minister Albanese that murdering aid workers is...

John Lazarus, Byron Bay

Byron Shire Council is doing Review of Planning Controls for the Byron Bay Town Centre. Submissions are due by 28 March.

Council’s proposals, allegedly, are to adopt height planning controls, (and increase from 9m to 11.5m on two sections of town) but Council has already given consent for precedents to breach existing height limits. A developer can legally rely on these to seek future breaches of the Reviews alleged heights limits. Therefore, this Review proposal is just worthless window dressing that now has legal backing.

The Review also proposes a restriction on developers providing on-site car parking, allegedly to get cars out of town, but this Masterplan-proposed-get-more-development-area facade only provides more development on a site, with more cars circulating to find parking on the public roads.

The Review also proposes increasing the 9m height limit to 11.5m on the area bounded by Bay Lane to the north, Lawson Street to the south, Jonson Street to the west and Middleton Street to the east (the proposed 11.5m height limit is likely to be breached due to Councils consent for legal precedent breaches). The Review also proposes increasing the 9m height limit to 11.5m for the vacant blocks at the bottom of Jonson Street near Mitre 10. I am advised that a developer proposes a construction there that would take advantage of these height increases.

Council should be upfront and tell the community what the developer wants to do before the public considers supporting this height increase.

The Review also wants to give developers permission for further height increases of between 0.4–1.2m throughout the entire town centre if a developer can claim it is to get the development out of potential floods.

The Review wants to change the town centre LEP (Local Environment Plan) zoning, but Council provides insufficient reason to support that, which leads to the question – why?

The Review also alleges that Council will not be changing the Masterplan proposal to reduce or eliminate developments that required open space but Council has already given consent to breach the existing open space requirement (and the 9m height) on the new mall development proceeding at the bottom of Jonson Street. This is on the basis of the developers DA statements that the extra storey and lower open space is supported by the Masterplan (yes, the original DA was rejected by the State Government Planning Panel, and yet, Council has given consents to breach existing regulations).

I’d urge people to put submissions to Council that the whole Review, with its entire dubious changes, be rejected. Mmake a comment at www.yoursaybyronshire.com.au


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Save Wallum now

The Save Wallum campaign has been ongoing and a strong presence of concerned conservationists are on site at Brunswick Heads. How the state planning...

Can Council’s overturn their decisions?

NSW Labor planning minister, Paul Scully, when asked about the Wallum estate by local MP Tamara Smith (Greens)  in parliament on March 20, said,...

The bridges of Ballina Council

Ballina Shire Council has started preliminary investigation works at Fishery Creek Bridge, on River Street, and Canal Bridge, on Tamarind Drive, as part of their plan to duplicate both bridges.

Tweed Council wants your ideas on future sports facilities

Tweed Council is looking for feedback from residents about future plans for sport and recreation in the area.