25.4 C
Byron Shire
December 4, 2021

Byron Council spending under the spotlight

Latest News

Growing number of dogs

Thanks to Alison Drover for her informative article in last week’s Echo regarding the growing number of dogs in...

Other News

COVID update December 3: One new case and advice for international travellers

One new case of COVID-19 was reported for Northern NSW Local Health District (NNSWLHD) in the 24 hours to...

Entertainment in the Byron shire for the week beginning 1 December, 2021

All your entertainment news in one brilliant place

Evidence-based claims on Dunoon Dam

Why is it that all I hear from the pro-dammers is: ‘Save Our Dam’, ‘Build the dam’ or some...

Editorial – More Byron Shire council candidate Q&A!

Where do candidates stand on disused railways and pay parking? Are they to the left of Chairman Mao Zedong, or the right of Genghis Khan?

Byron candidates 2021 Q&A part 2

Buckle in, seats upright, and loosen the belt!  It’s time to see what candidates have to say – in full...

Sinking real estate

For most of geological time, the Earth has been 5–15 degrees hotter than today. That’s why the dinosaurs did...

Before you vote at next month’s Council elections on December 4, it could be worth considering what the current lot did with your dollars.

With all but three members of the ‘Class of 2017’ choosing to run again, it’s time to get down to brass tacks and consider how they handled the purse strings.

Perhaps the biggest economic move made by the current Council was the 2017 decision to raise Council rates by 33.5 per cent over four years.

The extra $11.7 million in revenue was to be spent on asset maintenance and renewal, and to reduce the local infrastructure backlog that previous Councils had allowed to blow out massively.

Promises, promises

And to a significant degree, the Council kept this promise, with the extra money being spent on the bread and butter of local government: local roads, drains and other basic assets.

While councillors had little choice other than to spend the extra rates revenue in this way (the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal was watching closely) it’s fair to say that this outgoing Council did increase spending on Capital Works more generally.

Between the 2019 and 2020 financial years, an extra $20 million was poured into roads, rubbish and other basic assets, including the complete replacement of the creaking Brunswick Heads road bridge.

Bolstering the road-building fund was a seemingly never-ending stream of State government cash, driven by the Coalition’s desire to win back the State seat of Ballina.

Among the waves of funding was $20m provided by the State to help fund the controversial Byron Bypass.

Even with this big pile of government cash, the economic management of the bypass project was not Council’s finest moment (we’ll leave the debate over the environmental management of the project for another day).

The initial Council commitment of $4m blew out to nearly $6m, owing to a series of delays, the responsibility for which must, at least partly, be sheeted home to the Council itself.

Somewhat less controversial were major upgrading works on Ewingsdale Road to finally deal with the killer potholes that had regularly claimed car suspensions for decades.

While these works were almost certainly welcome, the same cannot be said for the ill-fated lighthouse sculpture built on the roundabout at the intersection of Ewingsdale Road and Bayshore Drive.

Nicknamed the ‘Disco Dong’, owing to its unfortunate resemblance to male genitalia, the Council forked out $55,000 for the much-derided sculpture. The installation was not only ‘aesthetically challenged’ in the eyes of most, it was eventually found to be structurally unsound and had to be taken down.

But it could be argued that the keepers of Council’s coffers had the last laugh – the silvery birds that made up the ‘Dong’s’ distinctive visage were sold off for the princely sum of $64,000.

Nevertheless, the cost to our collective egos from briefly being the laughing stock of the State is difficult to calculate.

The cost of net zero

Moving beyond roads, drains and bridges, one of the largest areas of Council expenditure has resulted from the efforts to move to net zero emissions.

The Council has committed to achieving 100 per cent net zero emissions for Council operations by 2025.

It has also promised to source 100 per cent of Council’s energy needs through renewable energy within 10 years (2027) and become certified under the Climate Active Carbon Neutral Standard by 2025/26.

Among the key, and most  costly, projects undertaken as part of this endeavour is the construction of a bioenergy facility connected to the Byron Bay Sewage Treatment Plant.

Initially budgeted at $12m, the budget for this project has already ballooned out to $16m before a single pipe has been laid.

The Myocum solar farm is also a major source of future expenditure, with Council estimating that the project will require at least $12m to complete.

There are hopes that the State and federal Governments will come to the funding party for both of these projects, but as yet no money has been placed on the table.

The next Council is likely to find these government dollars considerably more difficult to come by. The State seat of Ballina is now more safely in the hands of Greens MP Tamara Smith, meaning that the Coalition’s election strategists are likely to direct their considerable largesse and pork barrels elsewhere.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

1 COMMENT

  1. So, Potholes and roads were not a priority worth spending the money on in the Shire ?

    Better that Byron goes back to dirt roads like in the ‘good old days ‘ of the Dark Green fossils from the 1990 ‘s instead , Eh ?

    Also , one should not spend monies on a solar farm or construction of a bio-energy facility connected to the Byron Bay Sewage Treatment Plant.?

    Not Green enough or just Greener than the Greens ?

    This article is just plain silly and simply an attempt to bash the excellent current Council , led by Simon Richardson and now by Mayor Michael Lyon and to replace it with a misfit collection of fossilised Dark Greens .

    These Greens have been very shy ( invisible ) during this election and totally bereft’ of any practical policies . A total lack of Vision for the future of the Byron Shire .

    The present Council under Simon and Michael have been very successful in obtaining grants from the Government . The Dark Green lot would have Buckley’s chance of the same success , which , I notice , you acknowledge !

    Any one but DUNCAN !

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Responsible dog owner

I read with interest Alison Drover’s article on dog management and the follow up letters last week, and I couldn’t agree more. I am indifferent...

Dogs need control

I agree with Alison Drover’s recent article and her final line ‘wildlife needs more love, and our dog owners need a tighter lead’. But the...

COVID update December 3: One new case and advice for international travellers

One new case of COVID-19 was reported for Northern NSW Local Health District (NNSWLHD) in the 24 hours to 8pm 2 December. Northern NSW Local...

Last mayoral candidates Q and A: are you a landlord?

Here at The Echo we have seen and heard the word ‘housing’ come up time and again throughout the local government election campaign period, whether it’s from candidates or other voters.