22.1 C
Byron Shire
April 19, 2024

Information and, consultation lacking around Mullum pod homes 

Latest News

Not enough letters like this about Gaza in The Echo?

The Echo’s studied indifference to the plight of the Palestinians and its reluctance to publish letters on the subject...

Other News

Northern Rivers Recovery and Resilience Program announces 36 projects

Bridge expansions, upgraded pumps, enhanced evacuation routes and nature-based projects are just a few of the 36 projects being...

Rains, drains, floods

The ABC news and Guardian recently published reports of the potential return of La Niña in 2024 bringing similar...

Free healthy lifestyle program for families

Go4Fun is a free 10-week after-school program for children aged 7-13 and their families, which aims to support their health and wellbeing.

We wonder why

Living in Byron Shire the majority of people continue to ask why is this organisation continuously letting this community...

Statement of faith leaders following attack in Sydney

NSW Premier Chris Minns and Minister for Multiculturalism Steve Kamper have released a joint statement from a diverse group of NSW faith leaders, in an effort to calm tensions following the recent knife attack at Christ The Good Shepherd Church in south western Sydney.

Mass tree-planting planned for Bruns River in Mullum

More than five thousand native plants are to be planted along Brunswick River banks in Mullumbimby.

The site of the temporary pod village being built in central Mullumbimby on Prince Street. The street flooded with waist high water in the recent February 2022 floods. Photo Aslan Shand

Resilience NSW says it has engaged a team of design experts to ensure that the temporary pod village being built in central Mullumbimby to house flood victims is safe from flooding, and has stated that the pods themselves will be raised above flood levels.

But those living next to the pod village remain concerned, pointing out that they are yet to receive any assurances from the government that their homes will not be at greater risk of flooding as a result of the development.

The project will see 60 temporary housing pods, each with between one and four bedrooms, installed on a 2.5-hectare field on Station Street next to Woolworths.

The parcel of land on Prince Street, Mullumbimby where the State Government is planning to build a pod village for flood victims. Image: Google

In a letter sent to neighbours three days before preparatory construction works began last week, locals were told that the pod homes would have power, water and sewerage, and would be supported by a community housing provider.

However, the letter made no mention of whether the site had been assessed by engineers or hydrologists to determine whether it was appropriate for this type of development.

With residents receiving no other official communication about the site, a significant number became concerned about the flood-prone nature of the land, which was covered by around 1.5 metres of water during the February/March floods.

‘We understand that people need somewhere safe to live, but many of us are questioning whether this will actually be safe when the next flood comes,’ resident Rosie Bookallil said.

‘We haven’t been provided with any information about whether the project is flood-safe or not.

‘That includes whether it will create drainage and run-off issues that could threaten the surrounding homes as well as the pods.’

Mullumbimby’s CBD under water Monday 28 February. Photo Simon Haslam.

In a written response following repeated questioning by The Echo, a Resilience NSW spokesperson said the Mullumbimby site had been identified following a ‘comprehensive review’ of suitable land in the area led by the Department of Planning and Environment, and in consultation with Byron Council.

‘Flood safety is a priority,’ a Resilience NSW spokesperson said.

‘A detailed construction design is currently in progress, which will account for the flood prone nature of the land, and the most appropriate way of accommodating homes on site, based on expert advice and the input of a qualified multi-disciplinary design team. 

‘It will include the raising of pods above flood levels.’

This week, Byron Council confirmed that the Station Street site was one of a number of areas that it had recommended to Resilience NSW as being suitable for temporary flood accommodation.

‘Council presented a range of sites and information to Resilience NSW including assessments on location, proximity to services, suitability etc,’ a Council spokesperson said.

‘Resilience NSW then identified its preferred sites.’ 

Byron Mayor, Michael Lyon, said that he understood neighbours’ concerns, but that the Station Street site had been earmarked for community projects for a long time, and he had ‘made no secret about Council’s desire to make use of that land’.

‘Our main concern at the moment is about how long the flood response is taking, particularly in terms of housing, and the distress being experienced by the people who’ve lost their homes,’ Councillor Lyon said. ‘In an emergency like this you need to get things going.’

But Ms Bookallil and many of her fellow neighbours say the comments leave many of their concerns unresolved.

‘There is still no indication as to whether they have investigated the potential impact on the surrounding homes, and what steps they’re taking to ensure those homes aren’t affected,’ she said.

‘Also, if they’re still undertaking the design process, why are there trucks out there right now laying down layers of dirt on the site?

‘And why hasn’t anyone spoken to us as part of this design process? There’s been no consultation whatsoever.’


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

7 COMMENTS

  1. Resilience has promised to raise the pods above the 1.5m flood level. But if the pods were to be raised just a bit more there would be room to park vehicles under them. Mullum would then have not only floodproof pods but also additional parking – and, it gets better, a harmonious development to match the apartments going over the car park in Station Street.

  2. Nimbys. A disproportionate amount of time given in the Echo’s reporting to whinging and not enough to the benefits of 60 homeless families being housed. Be better.

  3. Guessing John Doe works for Resilience NSW.
    Certainly can’t be someone who lived through the floods in our town and saw what happened to this section of land.

    • Probably doesn’t even live in the area. There have been a lot of outsiders having a lot to say about matters which don’t affect them at all.

  4. U should see the debacle and waste of money being done on site at the one at pottsville north , it’s commical to watch these Muppets in action ,

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Anti-Israel bias

Many locals have approached me to say how shocked they are at the extreme anti-Israel bias that is expressed at many local events such...

D-day for Bruns pod village pesticide treatment

After two delays, the NSW Reconstruction Authority (RA) will be treating Bruns emergency pods with a pesticide treatment, despite some strong opposition from flood-affected residents.

Funds sought to complete clubhouse

Byron Bay Football Club may finally get the funds to complete its new clubhouse, with Byron councillors to consider loaning the club $200,000 at this week’s meeting.

Reclaiming childhood in the ‘device age’

A century and a half ago, the visionary Henry David Thoreau declared people had become ‘the tool of their tools.’  In this device-driven age of smartphones, social media, and artificial intelligence, few observations could be seen as more prescient.