22.1 C
Byron Shire
October 4, 2022

Cabarita DA refused on character grounds

Latest News

Dreaming of Midsummer

Byron Ballet Company is currently preparing for one of the world’s most beloved ballets, A Midsummer Night’s Dream. This...

Other News

Police pursuit after ute and motorbike stolen

NSW Police were at Pat Smith Park in Dulguigan, after reports a motorcycle had been stolen. As they arrived two males fled the scene, one on a motorcycle and the other in an Isuzu utility. The utility failed to stop for police and a pursuit was initiated.

Short films grace the screen from Oct 21

The Byron Bay International Film Festival is back from October 21 to 30 with a ten-day program of premieres, panels and parties.

Dreaming of Midsummer

Byron Ballet Company is currently preparing for one of the world’s most beloved ballets, A Midsummer Night’s Dream. This...

Meet Byron’s surf champ, Mark ‘Mono’ Stewart

While Byron attracts surfers of amazing skill, there have only been a few world champions. 

Acid sulfate soil run off impacting health of fish and Tweed River

Acid sulfate soil (ASS)-related runoff from floodplain drains is affecting water quality and the health of fish in the Tweed River and Tweed Shire Council (TSC) are seeking to assist landholders with improving water quality projects. 

Don’t forget your life jacket

A statewide waterway compliance blitz has found a that a large number of boaters are failing to carry and wear a lifejacket as requuried.

2-6 Tweed Coast Road, Cabarita Beach.

Recognising and respecting the current and future character of a location generally appears to rate at the low end of consideration for decisions by many councillors and staff relating to developments in the region. It is often concern over being taken to court by developers if a development application (DA) is refused that sways councillors to approve DAs that exceed the height, scale and bulk limits set out by council regulations like development control plans (DCP). 

The outcome of these decisions can be seen clearly in the Goldcoasatification of Byron with one local recently referring to current development as ‘looking like a prison’ – certainly not in line with the master plan, vision, or DCP of Byron. 

Therefore the decision by Tweed Shire Councillors at last Thursday’s meeting (4 August) to refuse a DA for a four-storey block of flats at 2-6 Tweed Coast Road, Cabarita Beach, against the staff recommendation of approval, was surprising. 

Mayor Chris Cherry (Independent) put the motion for refusal which was seconded by Councillor Dr Nola Firth (Greens). 

‘As a Councillor we often have to deal with issues that are not black and white. In this issue there is a matter of interpretation in terms of the development control standards that need to be adhered to,’ Cr Cherry told the meeting. 

‘We heard a lot in the 67 submissions, all of them raising problems with character and scale and amenity that this building is proposing. How it really does not fit in with the existing character of Cabarita, or the proposed future character of Cabarita. 

Community expectations

‘This is a refusal that comes back to the development not adhering to the control standards that are set in place by the community. I think its really important as a council that we need to try to adhere to those. We need to try to ensure that the developments going out there in our time as councillors are matching what the community have said that they want.

‘This very much does not match what the community want and I can’t support it in its current state. Certainly what I would be hoping to achieve is to come to a place where there can be a reduction in some of that scale and bulk of that building to be more in keeping with the current character and future character of Cabarita.’

Councillor Warren Polglase (Conservative) spoke against the refusal highlighting that the staff were ‘well educated, employed and experts’ and they had recommended approval. He said that Cr Cherry’s reasons for refusal were because ‘you believe it is non-complaint with the controls in place’… ‘That is an interpretation of an interpretation of an opinion. That is a difference of opinion’.

Over 30% variations sought 

Cr Firth highlighted that none of the 67 submissions on the DA were in favour and that the proposal was the first four storey building being proposed for Cabarita Beach. 

‘It is a very important proposal because it is the first one in Cabarita that is four storeys rather than three storeys and it will set a precedent,’ she said. 

‘We are sitting in a situation that we have climate change happening, we know we have floods happening. We have been told that we are going to be having much hotter summers so that heat is a really important variant happening here. In fact death by heat is the higher killer out of  those three disasters – fire, flood and heat. 

‘This particular development is a big block. Its a very big block and in its centre is has one planter. The end result of that is a huge piece of infrastructure that is going to be a heat bank. 

‘It is asking for a 36 per cent variation on open space. We as a community need to start saying that we need to have the infrastructure, including natural infrastructure, that’s going to be taking account of what we are going forward with. We need communal open space, we need trees – trees are free air conditioning, we need trees in there. 

‘This building is also 34 per cent longer than is allowed under the DCP. It is not about no development on that site, it is about appropriate development to what is happening to us now. 

‘It certainly doesn’t fit in the vision that the Bogongar/Cabarita Beach locality plan has. If we simply ignore those locality plans, and say that there is another thing that disqualifies it what’s the point of having it? 

‘There are many problems with it but the biggest one is the is the sheer scale and size of it. It could be changed and I hope it will be.’

The motion for refusal of the DA was supported by all councillors except Cr Polglase who voted against it.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

7 COMMENTS

  1. Imagine this. You see the hype around Cabarita Beach: Major supermarket, shop top housing, resorts are all established.

    You find an ideal site.
    You do your research and pay top dollar for it.
    You engage multiple professionals in varying fields.
    You submit a thorough application.
    A year later…(Yes, a year) council officers give you their support and recommend approval.
    By now you are likely organising your builders and contractors.

    And then……a noisy minority rally the councillors. The councillors treat the noise as the experts.

    Surely that can’t happen….It did. How? Well let’s use an outdated development control plan from the 2000’s, target some airy-fairy items and run with it.

    Forget the council officers and the later Tweed Local Environmental Plan and pray they don’t take us to Land and Environment Court. Actually, who cares it’s not our money anyway.

    Soon there will be no cranes in Tweed Shire and why would you risk it. I guess we are lucky we have an oversupply of housing here.

    • Your comment seems to support large developments in this shire. Whose side are you on? Are you a developer? Is that your view…to see Cabarita become another Surfers Paradise?

      • I think it is THE developer. They got the land for a steal and they want to capitalise the hell out of it. And they don’t care about the town, they care about maximising their returns. Those units will be selling for $3mil+ a pop, hardly providing affordable housing to the locals. The “noisy minority” are the representatives of the people who care enough to invest their time and effort to support the interests of the locals and stand up to the big bullies with the deep pockets and the arrogant attitude. Justice was done on August 4th. Well done Councillors for taking a stand and supporting the people and the town against those who try to railroad and exploit for their own financial gain. The rules are the rules, comply or ABCDEFU.

  2. 100% in favour of rejecting the DA
    Let’s keep Caba hi rise free
    Today we ok 4 story’s tomorrow we will have skyscraper’s and the only one’s who benefit are the greedy councillors and developers
    Col

  3. It’s an approval process, that’s a yes or no, ratepayers put councillors there to represent everybody, not just developers. Why have an approval process if they can’t say no, without developers crying. People have to put up with the aftermath of poorly approved long after developers move on.

  4. The law provides that the local community must comment before a DA decision is taken but also provides that if that commentary does not align with what Planning Law allows, Council is wrong in law to be swayed by popular opinion. So, the next step is up to the Developer. It can submit a revised DA guessing that it might appease the community’s subjectively based objections, or take its chances that the Land and Environment Court will objectively overturn the subjectively based Council resolution, or sell the land it purchased at a loss to someone else prepared to take a chance on presenting a DA that will have no subjective objections but still provide a fair return on investment.
    The thing is that all residents have the right to express a subjective opinion, but only ratepayers have to bear the costs awarded in favour of a Developer who wins a Court appeal. Maybe, the fair situation would be that residents raising subjective complaints and Councillors backing those complaints should have Court costs awarded against them if a Court appeal is upheld/have Court costs awarded in their favour if a Court appeal is dismissed, rather than have ratepayers carry the can.

  5. There are some developer-friendly councillors on the Gold Coast who could do well to carefully the words about preserving local character and amenity S well as complying with their own development codes in this decision.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Bundjalung art market

This year the region’s favourite Art on Bundjalung Market is coming to Kyogle on Saturday 22 October. The event will take over Stratheden St...

Interview with Phil Manning

What do blues folk Muddy Waters, Roy Buchanan, Albert Collins, BB King, Albert King, Freddie King, Sonny Terry, Brownie McGhee, Robert Cray, George Thorogood,...

Ballina council taking suggestions for Lennox Head plan

Anyone with ideas for improving or protecting particular parts of Lennox and Skennars Heads has until 28 October to let the Ballina Shire Council know.

Rain on the way…

Heavy rain is expected across much of the east coast of Australia over the coming week, but there is cautious optimism that the Northern Rivers won't cop the worst of the falls this time.