14.4 C
Byron Shire
April 22, 2021

Tweed subdivision ‘a flood risk’

Latest News

Shenhua gone and Breeza breathes again

In a much-hoped-for move, the NSW Government and the China Shenhua Energy Company Limited have reached a $100 million agreement in which Shenhua will withdraw its mining lease application and surrender its development consent for the Shenhua Watermark Coal project at Breeza on the Liverpool Plains.

Other News

Suffolk Park Pump Track

We the ‘Engaged Neighbours’, on behalf of the Suffolk Park pump track’s affected neighbours and 300–400 petitioners and letter writers, request Council NOT to continue to bulldoze the large fenced in section of Linda Vidler Parkland adjacent to Baz and Shaz’s shop, close to the houses on three sides.

Upside down river

Richard White, East Ballina I was going to deride the various government departments and agencies (DPI, DPE, OEH, EPA etc) that...

Increase in remote access scams

Local financial institutions say there has been an increase in remote access scams experienced by customers recently.

Follow the buck$

JK Mckenna, Burringbar Give Fast Buck$ his own column in the paper. Let him speak. Let him be heard. Let’s also...

Hippie fools

Edward Kent, Suffolk Park So, have the ‘hippie’ hipsters of Byron Bay figured out how the new global establishment party at...

Byron Bay wants Byron Baes to back off

Faster than speeding reality TV producer, members of the Byron community have swiftly mounted a multi-pronged attack against the proposed ‘influencer’ based Netflix show Byron Baes.

Nunderi-wp

The site for the subdivision pictured in January this year after substantial rain, viewed from the property of a neighbour who objected to the plan. Photo supplied.

Luis Feliu

The site for a controversial six-lot rural-residential subdivision near Murwillumbah approved by Tweed Shire Council last week has been described by a planning lecturer as ‘an absurd place to build houses’ because it was on ‘the floor of a gully that regularly floods’.

But council planners and state agencies have imposed more than 100 approval conditions on the two-lot into six-lot subdivision, on just over six hectares at Waterlily Close and Hindmarsh Road, Nunderi.

The proposal was dealt with at the past three council meetings and a special workshop. After being approved last month, it was rescinded and approved again after a marathon debate last week.

Neighbours had objected to the plan because of concerns over flooding, the treatment and disposal of sewage, and impacts on amenity, view sharing and the quality of the environment, including aquatic habitats.

But council planners, who had originally refused the plan in 2009 mainly due to the unsuitability of the site, recommended approval this year after the proponents, a local farming family, adjusted the plan to address their concerns.

During the hour-plus long debate, Cr Katie Milne tabled a report by a former council planner, Sandy Pimm, prepared for one of the objecting neighbours, which recommended conditional approval if two of the lots were either removed or their building envelopes repositioned.

Cr Milne said the neighbours were keen to restrict the development because of cumulative flooding impacts and the plan was all about ‘squeezing out the last lots’ of the old subdivision for the area.

She said around 2.5 metres of fill would be required to make the subdivision flood free as the site was ‘basically in the middle of a lake’ and if council approved it ‘we’d be a laughing stock’.

She said the site was prone to regular flooding, ‘around one (flood event) in three months rather than one in five or ten years’.

Headwaters

‘It will destroy a beautiful little catchment at the headwaters of a creek,’ she said, and it was ‘the most ridiculous subdivision’ she had seen in her life.

But Cr Phil Youngblutt said council planners and engineers at the workshop saw no major problems with the latest plan and the subdivision was legally permissible.

‘If we don’t vote for it, it would be an insult to the planning officers,’ he said.

Cr Carolyn Byrne argued that if it was refused, council could find itself before the Land and Environment Court and ‘the court would laugh at us’.

Cr Michael Armstrong agreed with her, saying the developer had a legal entitlement to the further subdivision of the current two lots and also criticised the ‘lateness’ of the neighbour’s consultant report, which he described as a ‘precis’ with no detail.

In the report, Southern Cross University lecturer Leigh Davidson said the ‘floor of a gully that regularly floods is an absurd place to build houses’, while consultant Duncan Dey, a Byron Shire councillor, said ‘one does wonder why the shire needs to develop flood-prone land when plenty of dry land is available elsewhere in the shire’.

Ms Pimm said in her report that the development had been re-submitted with minor changes, including some adjustments to the dam wall for safety purposes and a new onsite sewage management design report.

She said flood levels indicated in the application plans were incorrect and the local catchment did not behave as currently predicted.

Pads and fill

‘The placement of house pads and fill to accommodate the onsite sewage management system is likely to worsen the problems experienced by acting as barriers to flood flow,’ Ms Pimm said.

Cr Armstrong said a refusal was ‘likely to be struck out by a court’ and it was ‘not about good development, but whether it was legal’.

Cr Gary Bagnall said the neighbour’s view would be spoilt by ‘looking straight at this big house instead of Mt Warning’.

He said the development control plan for the area stipulated view sharing should be considered and the layout of the building ‘takes that away, swapping the Mt Warning view they paid for with the back of a house and yards’.

Chief planner Vince Connell told councillors the consultant’s report was ‘very late’ and unusual, but it did not substantially change any of the issues to warrant refusal.

The rescission motion overturning the approval was passed 4–3 (Crs Warren Polglase, Youngblutt and Byrne against) but the following motion to reject the plan was lost 2–5 (Crs Milne and Bagnall voting for refusal).

Mayor Barry Longland and Cr Byrne then moved to approve the plan as recommended by planners, which was passed unanimously.

 


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Pandemic plate lickers release lockdown dessert

The 2020 pandemic lockdown meant the entire entertainment industry was cancelled, but making music cannot be cancelled.

5MW solar farm funding under question

A 5MW solar farm proposed for Myocum, located near the Byron Resource Recovery Centre, poses a ‘high degree of risk’, and could jeopardise funding for other large Council infrastructure projects, according to a staff report, to be tabled at this Thursday’s meeting.

Tony Barry, Ben Chifley and FD’s Four Freedoms

Local actor-vist, Tony Barry, has taken on a lot since he moved to the Northern Rivers, and though cancer took one of his legs, Tony still manages to put in the hard yards for social, environmental and human rights causes.

Government bullying and hidden agendas

Frank Ball, Tweed Heads The treatment of Christine Holgate while CEO of Australia Post is nothing short of scandalous. Not only is it a prime example...