Menu

Byron Councillors reject staff tree-removal report

Byron Bay’s Railway Park. Photo by Mary Gardner.

A report by Byron Shire Council staff into the events that led to their cutting down three trees in Railway Park without warning at the end of October was rejected by councillors at their extraordinary meeting last Tuesday.

Such events are rare; usually staff reports are ‘noted’.

Mayor Simon Richardson penned the nine-point rejection of the report, which was authored by manager open space and resource recovery Michael Matthews.

He told the chamber, ‘I was very disappointed in the report. It simply did not answer the questions we asked.

‘The communication strategy wasn’t included in the report and didn’t appear to be followed. [Regarding] process, there were no flora and fauna reports.’

Cr Richardson said it gives councillors ‘no choice’ but to get an independent consultant report to see how the process failed and what steps can be put in place for the future. 

‘I don’t believe there was any wilful failing,’ he said.

Cr Alan Hunter was the only councillor who voted against and said while he hadn’t had a chance to digest the motion, ‘We could have handled this a lot better’.

‘We owe staff the respect to sit down and resolve this in private…There are no winners in this as a result of the motion. This is stubbing our toe and does not fix anything… I’m upset where it’s ended up.’

Cr Cate Coorey said it was a very public issue for the community. ‘I feel we have to deal with it in the public forum. It shows we are working for our community and that’s why we need to go through this process.’

In reply, the mayor said ‘This is not a response to the loud voices whom we will never be able to please. We took a 30-year-old native tree down without consultation. That simply has to be explained.’

‘I’m not interested in a witch hunt; I just want to move on. The things we asked for are not in the report. The community will not let us get away with that, and nor should they.’


One response to “Byron Councillors reject staff tree-removal report”

  1. Gigi says:

    I applaud the councillors who took a stand on this and demanded a better report. I wonder how many other reports though could be criticised on similar grounds – not addressing the questions asked, padding with copious but largely irrelevant detail etc? The difference is that trees in the park is an issue where some political quedos can be gained with a bit of public posturing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Become a supporter of The Echo

A note from the editorial team

Some of The Echo’s editorial team: journalists Paul Bibby and Aslan Shand, editor Hans Lovejoy, photographer Jeff Dawson and Mandy Nolan

The Echo has never underestimated the intelligence and passion of its readers. In a world of corporate banality and predictability, The Echo has worked hard for more than 30 years to help keep Byron and the north coast unique with quality local journalism and creative ideas. We think this area needs more voices, reasoned analysis and ideas than just those provided by News Corp, lifestyle mags, Facebook groups and corporate newsletters.

The Echo is one hundred per cent locally owned and one hundred per cent independent. As you have probably gathered from what is happening in the media industry, it is not cheap to produce a weekly newspaper and a daily online news service of any quality.

We have always relied entirely on advertising to fund our operations, but often loyal readers who value our local, independent journalism have asked how they could help ensure our survival.

Any support you can provide to The Echo will make an enormous difference. You can make a one-off contribution or a monthly one. With your help, we can continue to support a better informed local community and a healthier democracy for another 30 years.”

Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers and is brought to you by this week's sponsor  Falls Festival