10.1 C
Byron Shire
May 18, 2021

Byron Councillors reject staff tree-removal report

Latest News

All fired up: former magistrate fumes at news of the world

How does one react to news of environmental vandalism, rampant domestic violence and mutilation of women without anger or distress?

Other News

How to exercise more voting rights in council elections

Being a property owner in NSW isn’t just a financial advantage, it also means you have more rights to vote than non-property owners.

Diverse and resilient

Andrya Hart, The Channon After statements and actions by some Rous councillors, I am left wondering how many refusals to...

School Strike for Climate next Friday

Next Friday from 10am Byron Shire students will be demanding political action on the climate emergency in what they and their supporters say is our present, future and reality. 

MAYDAY – MAYDAY – One hundred years ago today

One hundred years ago this week, around noon on Saturday 14 May 1921, the 2,000 tonne steamship Wollongbar ran aground on Belongil beach.

Re Netflix

David Gilet, Byron Bay You would have to say that the Byron district has more than its fair share of wankers,...

Exotic and hybrid

Dailan Pugh, Byron Bay I was shocked to see the abundant exotic and hybrid plantings at Byron’s new bus interchange. As...

Byron Bay’s Railway Park. Photo by Mary Gardner.

A report by Byron Shire Council staff into the events that led to their cutting down three trees in Railway Park without warning at the end of October was rejected by councillors at their extraordinary meeting last Tuesday.

Such events are rare; usually staff reports are ‘noted’.

Mayor Simon Richardson penned the nine-point rejection of the report, which was authored by manager open space and resource recovery Michael Matthews.

He told the chamber, ‘I was very disappointed in the report. It simply did not answer the questions we asked.

‘The communication strategy wasn’t included in the report and didn’t appear to be followed. [Regarding] process, there were no flora and fauna reports.’

Cr Richardson said it gives councillors ‘no choice’ but to get an independent consultant report to see how the process failed and what steps can be put in place for the future. 

‘I don’t believe there was any wilful failing,’ he said.

Cr Alan Hunter was the only councillor who voted against and said while he hadn’t had a chance to digest the motion, ‘We could have handled this a lot better’.

‘We owe staff the respect to sit down and resolve this in private…There are no winners in this as a result of the motion. This is stubbing our toe and does not fix anything… I’m upset where it’s ended up.’

Cr Cate Coorey said it was a very public issue for the community. ‘I feel we have to deal with it in the public forum. It shows we are working for our community and that’s why we need to go through this process.’

In reply, the mayor said ‘This is not a response to the loud voices whom we will never be able to please. We took a 30-year-old native tree down without consultation. That simply has to be explained.’

‘I’m not interested in a witch hunt; I just want to move on. The things we asked for are not in the report. The community will not let us get away with that, and nor should they.’


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

1 COMMENT

  1. I applaud the councillors who took a stand on this and demanded a better report. I wonder how many other reports though could be criticised on similar grounds – not addressing the questions asked, padding with copious but largely irrelevant detail etc? The difference is that trees in the park is an issue where some political quedos can be gained with a bit of public posturing.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Business calls for Tweed train tracks to be kept ignored

More than 800 people had signed a petition calling for a new rail trail to be built next to, rather than in place of, the existing disused railway line running through the shire.

Resilient communities training on offer

‘Resilience’ has become a buzzword in Australia over the past few years, as communities across the country struggle to cope with fire, floods, and a pandemic.

Independent councillor fact-checks housing supply in the Byron Shire

Independent Byron Shire Councillor Cate Coorey won approval from fellow councillors last week for a new reporting regime she says will offer clarification on dwellings approved in the shire.

How to exercise more voting rights in council elections

Being a property owner in NSW isn’t just a financial advantage, it also means you have more rights to vote than non-property owners.