20 C
Byron Shire
August 1, 2021

WIRES ‘disappointed’ that Ballina Council won’t let ducklings hatch

Latest News

Unnecessary divisions

Louise Andrews, Lennox Head Dear Mandy, an excellent article in The Echo (Soapbox, 21 July). It saddens me too to witness...

Other News

Shooting in Nimbin

There is a police operation currently underway in Nimbin following a shooting earlier today.

Federal MP and rural Drs blast NSW Premier Berejiklian over Pfizer supplies

The decision by NSW State Premier Gladys Berejiklian to redirect Pfizer supplies from the North Coast to Sydney has drawn criticism from local Federal MP Justine Elliot.

Byron beach erosion

Ann Tiernan, Suffolk Park I strongly disagree with Council’s position stated in last week’s Echo that ‘The sand (at Clarkes Beach)...

New digs for Bangalow Lions Club

After 30 years of using a makeshift shed at the Bangalow Showground for their bar and barbecue, the Bangalow Lions Club have opened their newly constructed Lions Kiosk.

Zero

Andrew Macklin, Mullumbimby Creek Gareth Smith (July 14), I can see you like the selective use of historical facts and statistics...

Bruns North Arm

Jillian Spring, BillinudgelRegarding your article ‘A positive change to bring back the Bruns’, (Echo, 14 July). Since 2013/14 submissions to Council,...

Australian wood ducks. Photo supplied.

Update

Ballina Shire Council has responded to further questions regarding the wood ducks nest from Echonetdaily stating that:’

‘It is Council’s preference to transfer the eggs to the care of a licenced wildlife carer or group.

‘If that is not possible, Council has identified a potential site that is suitable for the relocation of the eggs. Relocating eggs is compliant with the terms of the National Parks and Wildlife Service permit.

‘As the removal of the tree is largely completed, the tree in its current state is a safety risk. The tree removal will continue after the eggs have been relocated.

‘During these final stages a licenced fauna consultant will be onsite to monitor the presence of other native wildlife.

‘A factsheet providing an overview of this complex issue can be found on Council’s website ballina.nsw.gov.au

 Original story

WIRES Northern Rivers (WIRES NR) have stated that they are disappointed  that Ballina Council are removing the wood ducks nest located in the 200 year old fig tree at Castle Drive in Lennox Head following the discovery of the nest deep in the hollow of the tree.

‘WIRES NR was consulted about removing the eggs and advice given by their Bird Coordinator with 15 years experience, Melanie Barsony, that moving the eggs to another location would not work,’ they said in a statement this morning.

‘Birds recognise their nest position, not the eggs and the parent birds will abandon the eggs if the nest site is destroyed. Raising ducks from eggs is very problematic as they imprint so readily. This is especially so with Wood Duck who nest in tree hollows.’

National Parks and Wildlife have now provided Ballina Council with a licence to remove the duck nest. Council has identified a suitable relocation site for the nest. Under the terms of the licence, Council may also transfer custody of the nest to a licensed wildlife carer.

However WIRES NR have said that ‘Wildlife carers are trained to raise wild animals, not pets. An imprinted duck will be unlikely to survive in the wild.

‘Council agreed to leave coverage of branches over the hollow and there was talk of leaving the tree until after the ducklings has hatched.

WIRES NR received a call yesterday to inform us that under the new NSW Biodiversity Laws, Ballina Council has now been granted a ‘Licence to Harm’, which gives them permission to remove the eggs and continue work removing the rest of the tree. This Licence to Harm allows three options:

1. Take eggs and get a wildlife care group to attempt to raise them

2. Relocate eggs into a surrogate nest where the parent ducks or other ducks MAY take over raising them

3. Euthanasia

‘The new NSW Biodiversity Laws have removed existing protection for wildlife, and events such as these are likely to increase in the future.

‘WIRES Northern Rivers is extremely disappointed that the decision has been made to remove the duck eggs and urges Ballina Council to wait a few weeks to allow the ducklings to hatch.

Why are they removing the fig?

Ballina Council have released a fact sheet on the removal of the fig tree stating that councils insurers will no longer insure the tree following ‘multiple successful claims’. They state that the cost of tree root barriers would be $150,000; the possible relocation of the tree is estimated at $450,000; and the purchase of impacted properties would be around $1.6 million.

‘The original subdivision for Castle Drive was approved by Ballina Shire Council in May 1980. That subdivision approval did not provide a reasonable buffer between the fig tree (on Council land) and the newly created private lots and there were no restrictions on the title relating to the fig tree.

‘Since that time, changes have been made to planning controls recognising the contribution of mature trees, which ensures this will not occur in the future.’


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

4 COMMENTS

  1. The very least they can do is allow the ducks the time they need and then cut down what remains.

    Again, will Ballina Council explain what the rush is ??? The tree roots won’t grow anymore in just a few weeks !

  2. How long would it take for the ducklings to hatch? Surely not that long that it would result in a damages claim! The duck and ducklings could then be relocated! Surely!

  3. This is utterly shameful that bureaucracy should lead to the destruction of such a landmark tree. That a driveway will over a living entity.
    ‘As the removal of the tree is largely completed, the tree in its current state is a safety risk.”
    Who is spouting this rubbish?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Bruns North Arm

Jillian Spring, BillinudgelRegarding your article ‘A positive change to bring back the Bruns’, (Echo, 14 July). Since 2013/14 submissions to Council, a more in-depth submission (29...

History repeats

Peter Olson, Goonengerry History shows that when the media and the politicians turn against the people, eventually there is a backlash. It seems hard to imagine The...

Byron beach erosion

Ann Tiernan, Suffolk Park I strongly disagree with Council’s position stated in last week’s Echo that ‘The sand (at Clarkes Beach) will come back, but it...

A day of ‘thank you’

Alison Drover, Broken Head How about a day of ‘thank you’ to our health workers and ‘sorry’ from our prime minister and ‘please’ from the community? Instead...