Flooding and damage to homes and businesses in New South Wales are as big an issue as they are in Queensland where I now live.
The recent local floods are the fault of the ongoing development practice by which buildings are permitted to be built on floodplains. The oft-cited measuring stick is the phrase: ‘1 in 100-year flood’ level clearance. This sounds exactly like the situation back where I used to live, in nearby Byron Shire.
Currently government in Australia uses the 1/100 AEP (Annual Exceedance Probability – AEP) event, or ‘1 in 100-year flood’, with an appropriate additional height for buildings this is designated as having an ‘acceptable’ risk for planning purposes, regardless of the potential consequences of a flood. Obviously, this is unsatisfactory as climate change marches ahead.
What do senior scientists think?
The Office of Queensland Chief Scientist’s website says (www.chiefscientist.qld.gov.au/publications/understanding-floods/chances-of-a-flood): ‘Currently, the one per cent AEP event is designated as having an ‘acceptable’ risk for planning purposes nearly everywhere in Australia. However, good planning needs to consider more than just the one per cent AEP flood.’
The report added ‘one per cent annual exceedance probability (or one per cent AEP), are preferred because they avoid the common misconception that a “1 in 100-year flood” for example, can only occur once every 100 years; or that you are “safe” for another 100 years after you experience such an event. For example, in Kempsey, NSW, major floods approaching the one per cent AEP level occurred in 1949 and then again a year later in 1950.’
A recent example is the sorry experience of someone who in July last year, bought and upgraded a small regional store near Gympie. Only six months later they were devastated when the flooding rose up to halfway up the two-storey building. And it happened again in the recent floods! The owner had been assured that the site was robust as per ‘1/100 AEP’.
The same flooding happened on a nearby greenfield land, which has a DA already approved by Gympie Council. When asked, the developer quickly said, ‘Development Application had met the “1/100 years” rule. So the development can go ahead.’
Mathematically calculated by hydrological engineers
On checking on this flooding issue with Gympie’s Regional Council, their Director of Community Sustainability, Adrian Burns, explained, ‘A 1/100 flood event is an event that is mathematically calculated by hydrological engineers… [The] development must meet the requirements that were assigned at the time of the assessment [in this case, back in 2013 when the DA was originally approved]. Please note that the buying and selling of land has no council involvement. Additional requirements cannot be placed on an already approved development applications in the future, should certain benchmarks, such as flooding, change.’
In other words, for existing developers with an approved DA, ‘no worries’. But buyers, beware! The recent approval of mega-development of the ‘locals’ West Byron DA is based on the same gob-smacking legal logic.
Maybe intending buyers of houses here should be aware on whether the property can be insured or not. According to an on line form, my house is now not insurable.
John, spot on comment.
The Insurance Industry is well ahead of the game with ‘insurance risk’.
If someone has a property and can’t get insurance or if you can get insurance that is prohibitively expensive, then that is a tell tale sign that the ‘risk’ to property is very very real.
We have been representing litigation for nearly 5 years to stop a major development on the Dunoon Road
floodplain. This development is Stage 1 for the North Lismore Plateau proposal.
This development if allowed to proceed is a scam, uninsurable , inundated and was isolated in 2017 and 2022.
Lismore Council approved it last year fully knowing this is the case and now are supporting the developer to try and strike out the proceedings before a hearing of the evidence.
Add in the 30 million plus of borrowed money for supporting infrastructure for the development the problem is deep rooted and those unfortunates who are sold this lolly will suffer,
Tweed shire has online 1:50 and 1:100 flood mapping overlays that can be accessed for free on their website for public information.
Whilst flood and weather prediction is not, and never will be, an exact science it is relatively simple to check flooding potential prior to purchase.
Perhaps Byron Shire and others could also offer this service? It’s not a guarantee, but it’s certainly ruled out a number of properties for us.
Having the sense to look at property without rose tinted glasses, and figure out that if the land is flat, and/or there’s a waterway, watercourse, etc., nearby into likely to flood would also be helpful.
Also, get a geotech engineer to do you a report before buying on hills, sometimes they’re not going to stay put.
So much property around here is ridiculously overpriced for the hazards that will be faced.
The safe height to be at in a floodplain is NOT.
Always was, always will be
That man at Gympie was seriously misled about the 1/100 height as the last flood was 2.26 below this level.