10.4 C
Byron Shire
August 15, 2022

Whitlam would have been a Green today

Latest News

Mud benda rant

Regarding last week’s Splendour Festival and all the ‘haters’ out there. I took along a few seriously fun-deprived teenage...

Other News

Mullumbimby Brunswick Valley footballers keep pressuring opposition Lennox Football Club

The Mullumbimby Brunswick Valley FC met up again with a much tougher Lennox FC in the Far North Coast...

Flood on Prince Street

It seems that the strongest impediment to the Prince Street temporary housing is the addition of fill to the...

Recognising history

I arrived in Mullum from Sydney in 1976 – I loved the town and the people and felt like...

Criminalising protest

In another Sstate government descent into criminalising protest, to protect their own government’s sabotage of a liveable planet, last...

Where the Crawdads Sing

Abandoned by her family as a girl in the dangerous marshlands of North Carolina, Kya Clark, otherwise known to...

Mullum locals protest flood-prone pod site

Around 40–50 locals gathered outside the Byron Shire Council chambers this morning to highlight the risks of, and lack of due process around, the selection of the flood accommodation pod site in Mullumbimby.

whitlamBy Hall Greenland*, Greens NSW convenor, through Crikey

‘Suck it up, comrades’ I suspect would have been Gough Whitlam’s response to Labor charges that the Greens are political grave robbers, ‘stealing Gough’ by honouring the memory of his radical reformism.

One thing Whitlam and Malcolm Fraser came to agree on later in life, and I think we can accept Fraser’s testimony on this, is that both major parties have swung markedly to the Right.

The rise of the Greens is partly an expression of this; they have occupied the ground that post-Whitlam Labor vacated to its Left. This is Australian politics 101. When you get down to specifics, this process is obvious.

Whitlam’s government abolished university fees. A later Labor government reintroduced them. The Greens opposed the reintroduction.

Even in its last year the recent federal Labor government announced cuts of $2.3 billion in university funding, including over $1 billion cut from start-up scholarships for students from lower-income families.

It was the Greens that opposed these moves and defended the Whitlam heritage.

The same process went on with the single parents’ pension, another of the signal reforms of the Whitlam era.

Perhaps the worst example of this abandonment of what we may call Whitlamism was in indigenous affairs.

While the Whitlam government responded positively to the Aboriginal movement for self-determination, the last Labor government continued the John Howard-Mal Brough intervention in Northern Territory Aboriginal communities despite the pleas from those same communities.

The Greens were again on the side of Whitlam’s legacy.

On a personal level, the charges of expropriation are also wide of the mark. Many Whitlamites ended up in the ranks of the Greens. Some of them were there at the birth.

Take Tony Harris, the man who initiated the founding of a specific Greens party in Australia and became the party’s first registered national officer.

He joined the Labor Party in 1969, the first year of the Whitlam surge, and went on to become secretary of his branch and a tireless activist in the Whitlam election campaigns of 1972, 1974 and 1975.

But by the 1980s he was disillusioned not only with Labor’s charge to the Right but by its sclerotic response, so un-Whitlam, to the new issues of our time.

Tony’s shift to the Greens was representative. A whole segment of the Whitlam base split off. I can recall Fred Daly reporting to our Labor Party branch in early 1973 that he could not remember all the names of the new MPs who had flooded into Parliament on Whitlam’s coat-tails.

‘So when they say “Good morning” to me in King’s Hall I just respond by saying “Good morning, doctor”, and generally that’s right.’

Fred was, of course, an old working-class stalwart of the NSW Labor Right, but Whitlam’s Labor had won the new educated middle class. That electorate has now substantially passed over to the Greens.

Talking of Daly, after Whitlam had sacked Jim Cairns, Clyde Cameron and Rex Connor (or encouraged them to resign) Daly told the branch he was worried because it looked like Whitlam was purging his cabinet alphabetically and in that case he was next.

Jokes aside, the citing of the names of those ministers again reminds us, without in any way idealising them, of the sheer radicalism of some of Whitlam’s ministers. The establishment, for good reasons, did not consider them safe men. Who could say that about any of the current crop of Labor MPs?

Finally, what is often overlooked is that the Whitlam government was very much an expression of, and response to, the wider radicalism of the time.

The Whitlam years from the late-1960s to the mid-1970s were the time of the moratoriums, of Aboriginal land occupations, of draft resistance, of the birth of the women’s movement and gay liberation, of urban environmentalism — and let’s not forget a thriving union movement that had thrown off its fears of penalties and was busy squeezing profits and redistributing income downwards, as well as challenging management prerogatives at work.

The Whitlam government’s genius was to respond positively to that wider movement. So it ended conscription. It legalised and underwrote Aboriginal land occupations. It abolished the tax on the Pill. It supported women’s refuges. It bought the Glebe Estate in Sydney’s inner-west, nearly 600 houses of working-class rental housing destined for the open market and the possible eviction of the tenants.

Likewise, it saved Woolloomooloo in response to the campaign of residents and the Builders Labourers Federation. It withdrew funding for expressways. Not to mention its acceptance of quarterly cost-of-living wage adjustments and generous wage rises.

It is this aspect of the Whitlam era that federal Labor has lost. It is now a pro-war party. It approved CSG fracking and mining in wilderness forests and prime farm land. It promised funds for inner-city motorways. It could not even legislate for marriage equality.

It is the Greens who now best express the reformist impulse for which the Whitlam era was justly famous. Not that any of us are going to complain if people in the Labor ranks are keen to revive some of that old-time Whitlamism. All power to their Left arms.

* Hall Greenland joined the Labor party when he was 17 and was a member for 22 years. He then joined the Greens. He is now convenor of the Greens NSW.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

10 COMMENTS

  1. How disrespectful and insulting to the legacy of Gough Whitlam can this guy be to claim that Gough would be a member of the Greens?

    This article is a perfect example of the how the Greens ignore facts for ideological and political reasons and why they will never be in a position to govern in this country.

    The fact is that Gough Whitlam was not a member of the Greens. If he had any inclination to support them 610he would of joined during his lifetime. He did not. He was a Labor Party member. Simple fact.

    A fundamental reason that Gough was able to introduce all the amazing legislative changes to Australia during the time he was in government was because first he reformed the Labor party. He set the conditions within the party to achieve the changes we so desperately needed as a country.

    This is exactly the process the Labor Party is now undertaking. A process of reform that commenced with the direct voting of members in leadership contests. This process is continuing. This is why we are seeing a growth of Labor Party membership around the country. A membership that will ensure Labor remains the party of the people.

    Maybe the Greens would be better off looking inwards and changing the shambles and dysfunction within their own party rather then trying to co-opt the achievements of one of the greatest leaders this country has even seen.

    I am proud to call myself a Labor Party member – the party of Gough Whitlam.

  2. Paul Labor has been a weak, right-wing opposition to the Abbot Government. The ALP has supported laws to rip money of single parents, brutalise refuees, a new foreign war, draconian mass surveilance laws and dirty CSG mining etc. Now Bill Shorten is speaking at the homophobic christinan lobby conference.

    Face the facts. The ALP is beyong reform and you will be spat out just like Peter Garrett.

  3. The question is this:

    Why did the Greens said for Whitlam to die before claiming his legacy?

    Was it to deny him a right of reply?

    Was it because they knew that Whitlam would slam them for it?

    If not for these reasons, then why?

  4. Gough would never have been a member of the Greens. His energy was focused on winning government [for the Labor party] not being perennially in opposition like the Greens. Hall appears to be re-writing history to his own design. I seem to remember that he was a Trotskyite before he joined the Labor party although I could be wrong.

    Hijacking icons is not really a good look although coming from the Greens it doesn’t surprise me.

  5. The ALP have a terrible legacy on the North Coast. Closing down our train line and unleashing CSG mining. Still the party of Eddie Obeid and Ian MacDonald. Yuk!

  6. Gough a greeny? Don’t insult the dead man’s intelligence. He would be a conservative today after having seen the mess his Labor party left the country in during the Rudd/Gillard regime.
    He would have learned by now from the legacy of his own fiasco thanks to Jim Cairns and that crowd.

  7. Does the current labor party support the policies that Gough championed? It would appear that his policies and vision for Australia is much more aligned with the Greens.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Autocracy or democracy for Byron Shire?

The New Yorker Magazine recently wrote a quote from Mr Rupert Murdoch ‘The truth is authoritarian governments do work!’ Hold that thought. It has been...

Criminalising protest

In another Sstate government descent into criminalising protest, to protect their own government’s sabotage of a liveable planet, last Thursday new laws were passed...

Mullum pods

First, Hans Lovejoy’s article ‘emergency wedged’ was educational, factual and provided valuable information to the community. Michele Grant’s letter (27 July) was emotive overgeneralisations...

Flood residents get $650 from Lismore Council

Lismore City Mayor Steve Krieg today announced that 1,558 residents will receive a grant of $650 from the Lismore Flood Appeal.