11.3 C
Byron Shire
May 18, 2021

‘Go it alone’ council ignores advice over rock wall plans

Latest News

All fired up: former magistrate fumes at news of the world

How does one react to news of environmental vandalism, rampant domestic violence and mutilation of women without anger or distress?

Other News

Locals call for automatic revocation of speeding fines on Hinterland Way in first half of April

When local man Nathan Hicks saw posts on Facebook about locals who had received fines they believed were incorrect he decided to look into challenging his own fine. 

Ageism alive and well

Margaret Boshier, St Ives I have been spending time in the ocean since before I could walk; I grew up...

A grubby business

Cr Cate Coorey, Byron Shire Council Among the reasons Simon Richardson gave for his retirement from the mayoralty was the...

OCA a ‘diamond in the rough’

Around four years ago a group of like-minded friends started a Syntropic Farm project. Since that time, they have...

Any questions?

‘This is a great chance for foodies to ask me anything they want’, says local chef Darren Robertson, who...

Remembering Bentley

Saturday 15 May is the seventh anniversary of Victory Day at the historic Bentley Blockade, just west of Lismore.

Byron Shire councillor Sol Ibrahim.
Byron Shire councillor Sol Ibrahim.

Hans Lovejoy

Byron Shire mayor Simon Richardson has lashed out at fellow councillor Sol Ibrahim after he pushed through a motion last week effectively rejecting an offer by scientists and economists to help the council manage the Shire’s pristine coastline.

Instead the council will pay more money to a contractor whose draft cost benefit analysis the state government has already rejected, a move that will push the long-awaited Coastal Zone Management Plan even further behind schedule.

The strategy could also see the potential erosion of Belongil Beach, one of Australia’s most iconic surfing beaches.

And with the support of Crs Wanchap, Cubis, Woods and Hunter, Cr Ibrahim also rejected an offer by the NSW Office Of Environment And Heritage (OEH) to redo a cost benefit analysis for the planned Belongil rock wall at no cost to council.

As reported in The Echo previously, the Belongil rock wall project aims to protect high-priced sand- dune real estate, specifically three private properties and some Council-managed land.

But it’s over budget, has been kept secret, is close to losing state funding and has been criticised by expert scientists who deal with coastal planning.

Additionally, no contribution offer has been publicly announced by the landowners, making the cost to ratepayers unknown.

Nearly $22,000 of public money was splashed at the project last week, earmarked for lawyers and consultants. That adds to the estimated $142,500 already spent since January. Apart from funding the project, there are expected upkeep costs of ‘nourishing’ the beach with imported sand to prevent depletion.

As for the offer of help from the OEH, Cr Ibrahim claims that the department is trying to take ‘control of the process’.

He told The Echo, ‘The OEH steering committee excludes all stakeholders and councillors. Only staff are invited, and that is mainly so that property information could be provided at the early stages of the process.’ He also claims that Council staff are ‘frustrated with the OEH and confused with the inconsistent advice provided.’

‘The advice from the OEH has been heeded, and will inform the revision of our cost benefit analysis by the consultants,’ he said.

Beach to be ‘accessible 95 per cent of the year’

And while the plans are still unfolding, Cr Ibrahim claims that ‘Our expert engineering advice is that techniques [such as engineered protection works, groynes and sand nourishment systems] in combination will provide an accessible beach for 95 per cent of the year.’

In reply to whether the rock wall will result in beach erosion, he said, ‘This could not reasonably be said to be a “loss” of the beach.’

As for who pays, he says, ‘The Coastal Protection Act 1979 requires that any approval for permanent protection works must include a credible plan for maintenance and repair by private property owners as a condition of consent.’

Meanwhile, Council’s director of sustainable environment and economy, Shannon Burt, says the coastal zone management plan (CZMP), which outlines coastline management, is unlikely to meet the June 30, 2015 deadline.

She told The Echo it was owing to, ‘belated intervention by the OEH in relation to the draft cost benefit analysis prepared by Council’s consultants.’

The rock wall project, entitled Coastal Hazard Management Study Byron Bay Embayment, was also a ‘key part of the CZMP’.

‘The OEH have recently advised that they are completing their own independent cost benefit analysis of the management study. As a result, Council’s consultants will also need to review the alternative cost models. This task comes at additional cost and time.’

A spokesperson from the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage explained that funding for the ‘interim protection works at Belongil Beach was subject to the submission of a draft design that satisfied the NSW Coastal Panel and relevant state agencies, including OEH, and grant requirements’.

They told The Echo that OEH had, ‘concerns with the proposed design related to the scale of works, impacts to public safety, beach access and amenity.

‘Funding has not been withdrawn and is still available dependent upon submission of a satisfactory design,’ they said. ‘OEH has recommended Byron Shire Council complete its CZMP as a matter of priority.’

Byron Shire mayor Simon Richardson. Photo Eve Jeffery
Byron Shire mayor Simon Richardson. Photo Eve Jeffery

Rocks bias: mayor

Council’s rejected offer of scientific advice from the OEH has angered mayor Simon Richardson, who told The Echo that ‘integrity and scientific rigour have been jettisoned.’

‘Cr Ibrahim and his supporters don’t want the eyes of the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) over it. I do,’ he said.

‘And they should too.’

‘OEH have rightfully been appalled with the interim wall fiasco and are concerned about our economic modelling, which was clearly biased towards a rock wall “solution”.

‘When the OEH chief economist steps in with serious concerns about the cost benefit analysis modelling considering all the possible options; tells us his team will redo one at their expense and they wish to create a high level expert Council and OEH steering committee to make sure the process is robust and thorough, why wouldn’t we support that?’

He queried what expertise Crs Ibrahim, Wanchap, Cubis, Woods and Hunter had in the field.

‘I share the need to get this management plan completed as quickly as possible, but not at the expense of the opportunity for staff and OEH to work together to achieve a better, more transparent and more considered outcome.’

Expert concerns

And dumping large rocks on beaches has also attracted criticism from another expert in the field; retired coastal engineer and long-time resident Andrew Winton-Brown addressed council on Thursday and asked them to explain the secrecy and cost benefit analysis.

He said, ‘Estimated to cost up to $3m to build and $800,000 per year to run, has this plan been factored into any of the analyses of the options particularly the environmental, social and tourist impacts of building such a system at a popular surfing beach and within a national park? Have National Parks and the Arakwal people been consulted as stakeholders?

‘What are the risks associated with this plan?’

‘Once the CZMP legitimises the rock walls, they still have to be built,’ Cr Duncan Dey told The Echo. ‘None of the current structures are up to the standard that will be required.

‘Funding of the re-construction is therefore their next hurdle. Their desire is to have the state – ie the public – fund as much as possible. Not only are the capital costs critical, but the ongoing maintenance is a huge long-term issue.

‘I think the residents are ready with the capital to build new correctly designed walls but what they don’t want is twofold: to foot the bill for sand nourishment and to carry the responsibility for rebuilds after storm damage. Our science is clear: (1) there will be no sand in front of the walls after a decade or two unless it is imported; and (2) with sea level rise (and no beach), damage to the walls will become more frequent.

The nation is watching

‘This is government in secret,’ he said. ‘The rest of the councillors are cut out of all of these plans, and it’s because our vote doesn’t matter.

‘This motion was thrown at us on the day and it took up more space than the overhead screen allowed.’ And despite being locked-out in decision -making, Cr Dey says ‘the nation is watching: our outcome will set a tone for many parts of NSW and Australia.’

But Cr Ibrahim agreed for community input in the process. A community advisory/reference panel will be established; however, its terms of reference and influence are yet to announced.

According to Cr Ibrahim, ‘There have been several meetings already which included concerned members of the public. They were provided with expert presentations, and participated in robust debate.’

Cr Ibrahim also defended the secrecy as ‘lawful process’ and told The Echo that, ‘the staff report explains that it is because of certain actions of the OEH that our draft is not ready for public exhibition.’

‘The recent attempt by OEH to take control of the process would further delay the process, well beyond the minister’s deadline of June 30.’

Previous articleMore goals for the Rams
Next articleWhen 360 did a 180

Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.


  1. It would seem that Cr. Sol Ibrahim doesn’t really understand local government vis-a-vis issues of State or National Infrastructure.

    The coastline and its associated problems belong to the State & National offices set up to deal with these matters.

    Byron Shire is merely a custodian of the shoreline.

    This is akin to a property owner telling his property manager what kind of roof he wants to erect to make a repair; and having the manager decide it is his responsibility and totally disregard the wishes-and legal right of the owner.

    Sol and his mates need to be schooled on this. There is very little a group of locals can add to a complex problem of erosion, construction, and economics.

    And the owners of the three parcels most in danger- it was their choice to build there…no one forced them. this is why pre-sale home & property inspections should include a geological survey done by a professional to make buyers aware of existing or potential land-shift, landslide, erosion problems.

    It seems these three didn’t do their due diligence and now want us Shire residents to foot the bill for their lifestyle and protection of property value; when in fact Local, State or National Gov’t really owe these people nothing. If their houses slip away, the public good and citizens are not immediately placed in harm’s way.

    The issue here is stabilising the beach; the side effect is stabilising the properties. however these people think it’s a free ride to attach their poor purchase decisions and liability to the State or Council’s purse strings.

  2. Cr. Sol Ibrahim told me several years ago that he had been elected to Council solely for the purpose of erecting this rock wall to protect a few properties built on the dunes whose owners refuse to back off..
    He also admitted there would be significant or total beach loss, but felt, given all the other beaches in the area, this was of little concern. As a surfer, he has no interest in maintaining a beach there for public use.

    I guess we should call this the privatisation of Belongil Beach, the beach that was and soon will be no more. And so it comes to pass – with the backing of Rose Wanchap, our great environmentalist.

    Its wrong, its appalling. I’m disgusted. That sweep of beach, the bay, should be protected at all costs. It should remain ONE whole arcing beach, not several small coves amidst rocky outcrops.

    But now the residents are being asked to pay for its fragmentation and loss. Bye bye iconic beach. Bye bye international tourists. Hello swampy hollow.

  3. Having lived in the Netherlands for some years, I can vouch for the fact that where there are solid walls along the coastline – there is no beach. The people in Belongil , who Sol Ibraham is representing are not interested in the public having a beach, as long as their properties are secure for a few more years. Of course, nothing will stop the sea from backing up Belongil Creek, and possibly attacking these properties from the rear.
    Why should every ratepayer have to fork out to protect this sandspit, solely for the benefit of a few wealthy landowners. Those Councillors who have backed this should be independently investigated, as they are useing
    their position eroneously.

  4. Byron councillor Sol Ibrahim and his unabashed support for wealthy Belongil property owners raises questions as to who he really represents

  5. I used to believe the Green/Echo story about Belongil, until I actually looked at the history.

    I doubt a single commenter, including Lovejoy, have checked beach levels since 1885,

    and to discuss Belongil without mentioning sandmining makes as much sense as discussing

    a train wreck without a train.

    I have warned people, if you keep living in a fantasy land, the opportunity to bring in a sane

    solution will be taken away.

    But go on, keep pretending you have any idea what’s going on.

    Matt Hartley,

    person who bothered to do the research.

  6. For Christs sake just fix these god-awful, deadly roads. Every driver feels the same – local, tourist alike. no one can believe why this bizarre Councils prefers to maintain rock walls and pursue mad legal battles rather than provide basic road services.

    BASIC SERVICES, Roads, garbage, etc…..Remember!?

    What’s the plan Council? I mean, really, what’s the actual plan for Roads?….

  7. “Would you buy a used car from this man?” … (the question famously posed about Richard Nixon, for those missing the reference..)


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Business calls for Tweed train tracks to be kept ignored

More than 800 people had signed a petition calling for a new rail trail to be built next to, rather than in place of, the existing disused railway line running through the shire.

Resilient communities training on offer

‘Resilience’ has become a buzzword in Australia over the past few years, as communities across the country struggle to cope with fire, floods, and a pandemic.

Independent councillor fact-checks housing supply in the Byron Shire

Independent Byron Shire Councillor Cate Coorey won approval from fellow councillors last week for a new reporting regime she says will offer clarification on dwellings approved in the shire.

How to exercise more voting rights in council elections

Being a property owner in NSW isn’t just a financial advantage, it also means you have more rights to vote than non-property owners.