16.3 C
Byron Shire
October 16, 2021

Developer pleads for fee reduction in Byron Shire

Latest News

Let’s get real

AFL Aussie Rules Grand Final in Western Australia... Rugby League Grand Final in Queensland... Melbourne Cup in Tasmania?    Margaret Keating,...

Other News

Bias

Congratulations on more ridiculous and biased coverage of the protests last Saturday. Rather than objectively report on the march, you...

Editorial: Clear as a muddled government

Good news! Local police will not be actively enforcing the government’s Public Health (COVID-19 General) Order 2021 when it comes to business activity – see NSW govt’s Health Order lacks clarity.

Cultural heritage report goes public

A redacted copy of the 2013 Ainsworth Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment document has been made publicly available on the Rous County Council website, clarifying the extensive Widjabul-Wiabul connections with the land which would have been inundated by the Dunoon Dam.

Thanks Frank Mills

We had lost our highway protest, but during those colourful marches we had the beginnings of a stronger sense...

End the cult

A military conflict between China and the USA would very likely result in global nuclear war, a major setback...

Satvik Foods simply: sauté, simmer & serve

Easy. Delicious. Healthy. Satvik Foods ready to go packs will have you coming back for thirds! Their range includes...

An estimated 976 vehicle movements per day would use the narrow Ruskin Lane under a large Byron CBD DA. Image from DA 10.2019.616.1.

Locals could be forgiven for scoffing at the idea of a cashed-up property developer asking for fee relief from Byron Council to help boost his profit margin.

But it appears that when Byron developer, Jason Dunn, came before Council last week complaining about fees for using Council land during construction, he may have had a point.

Mr Dunn has approval to build a three-storey mixed-used development with a rooftop pool and two underground parking areas on the corner of Jonson and Browning Streets, Byron Bay.

This controversial approval includes paying to use a Council road reserve next to the development for loading and unloading vehicles during construction.

Mr Dunn has already paid $193,050 for this privilege, and says that at the current rate he could end up forking out more than $500,000.

He came before Council last week asking for some of his money to be refunded on the grounds that the fees were ‘massively disproportionate’ when compared to other local councils.

‘I assure you that it gives me no pleasure to be pleading for a reduction in Council fees and charges,’ Mr Dunn said.

‘The amount of the charge is meant to be set by reference to other fees and charges set by similar councils and competitors.

‘But calculations show that when compared to the Ballina, Tweed, and Lismore councils, on average, the fees being charged by Byron Council are 574 per cent higher.

‘And they’re 240 per cent more expensive than the most expensive nearby council, being Tweed Shire.

‘I’m seeking a reduction to a level that is still in excess of the other nearby Local Government Areas.’ 

But Council staff disagreed, recommending that the fees not be reduced or refunded.

They said the development was using a large proportion of the frontage to Jonson and Browning Street for private purposes, which resulted in considerable disruption and inconvenience to the public.

They also warned that any reduction could set a precedent ‘for other developers to seek a refund or reduction in their fees and charges’.

When the matter was discussed at the Council meeting, it was confirmed that the fees in Byron were significantly higher than for neighbouring council areas.

However, the meeting also heard that there had been no objections from developers or community members when the fees schedule had been publicly exhibited alongside the Shire’s many other fees and charges.

Councillors were divided, engaging in a debate of more than 90 minutes on the issue.

This included two motions to defer the matter, pending investigations into Council’s fee structure by staff or the Local Government Ombudsman.

But both of these motions were defeated, as was a motion to refuse Mr Dunn’s application for a reduction.

The inability of councillors to reach a consensus position effectively meant that the status quo remained in place.

Mr Dunn will not receive any refund on his fees, and the current fee structure will remain in place unless, or until, a motion is passed to review it.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

9 COMMENTS

  1. Spare me the developer’s tears! At last our council has found the cojones to say No to a cry-poor developer. Bravo!

  2. I’d prefer the fees to be $100 million.

    We don’t need more development, we need to crash prices here. But that isn’t going to happen is it? Byron is Gold Coast 2.0 and there’s going to be a skyscraper soon.

    It’s inevitable.

  3. If it’s cheaper in other shires how about you go build it there. That development is going to be a nightmare for traffic jams in the peak holiday periods. Selfish prick

  4. If Mr Dunn wants to use other councils (Tweed, Ballina) fees as a comparison then you only have to look at what the medium house price is in Byron compared to what the medium house price is in Ballina for example ($2mil deference). He should be able to claw back some of his fees through his sales in Byron…

  5. What would you expect from a council that can’t afford to fix or recognize it’s own mistakes keep voting in clowns and you will end up with a big top

  6. ‘I assure you that it gives me no pleasure to be pleading for a reduction in Council fees and charges,’ Mr Dunn said.
    Really?
    A prime real estate location and still they whinge….over what?..$200k in councils fees when he has “prospective” $ millions in future income from selling his development.
    This bloke has no shame..
    Stuff it…
    Double the rent fees.. give him something to whinge about!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Mandatory vax

I write to you in response to the article on the front page of The Echo relating to mandatory vax. I find it extremely...

End the cult

A military conflict between China and the USA would very likely result in global nuclear war, a major setback to human civilisation and possibly...

Hundreds queue to have COVID test and two new cases in the NNSWLHD

Northern NSW Local Health District (NNSWLHD) is urging people to continue coming forward for testing and vaccination after two further COVID-19 cases were reported in the 24 hours to 8pm last night, October 14. 

Charges after cars damaged in police pursuit – Coffs Harbour

Police say a man has been charged following a pursuit, where a number of cars – including an unmarked police car – were sideswiped on the Mid-North Coast yesterday.