Menu

Whale burial on Tweed beach raises a stink with locals

Locals at Casuarina beach surround the beached pilot whale. Photo Department of Primary Industries

Locals at Casuarina beach surround the beached sperm whale. Photo Department of Primary Industries

Luis Feliu

The burial of a dead four-metre sperm whale which had beached at Casuarina Beach on the Tweed Coast last week has caused a stink with locals who fear its rotting carcass could pose a health risk to beach users and also attract sharks to the area.

The 3.8-metre whale calf was found by locals alive on the beach on Monday 4 January, but died soon afterward and two days later it was buried using heavy machinery in the dunes between two access tracks south of a tourist resort at Casuarina.

Staff from Seaworld on the Gold Coast and NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) were called to the site where the whale had stranded.

An NPWS spokesman said the whale had some minor injuries consistent with stranding as well as some smaller shark bites.

But he said there were no obvious signs of why the whale stranded or died.

‘Tissue sample were taken. The carcass was buried in the hind dunes,’ the spokesman told Echonetdaily.

But Casuarina resident David Logue says the whale carcass should not have been buried there but taken to a tip to dispose of, as Gold Coast City Council does.

The whale is prepared for removal to a nearby burial site. Photo Department of Primary Industries.

The whale is prepared for removal to a nearby burial site. Photo Department of Primary Industries.

Mr Logue said the burial has ’raised the ire of a number of residents whose families are regular beach users, business owners and members of a local surf lifesaving club’.

He said the rising tide the other day came within metres of the burial pit of the carcass, and wave action could expose the  decomposing carcass ‘in this tourist and residential area’.

Mr Logue said the burial had occurred at the beginning of the annual cyclonic-weather season which regularly caused erosion along the beach there.

He said the carcass’s natural decomposition ‘will leach oil, blood and other body fluids through the sand and into the nearby surf where hundreds of people swim, wade and surf each week’.

The site of the burial. Photo supplied

The site of the burial. Photo supplied

‘The decomposition of the carcass can leach upwards absorbing the sand layer to create a jelly‐like putrefying pit of flesh, producing an awful stench which will in turn attract vermin,’ he told Echonetdaily.

‘I am advised that this occurred on the Gold Coast some years ago. I also note signs erected in this location warning of the recent harassment of people by wild dogs.

‘Naturally I, along with other residents that I have spoken with are gravely concerned that the above actions will attract sharks to the stretch of beach and will continue to do so as the carcass decomposes, leaching through the sand and into the sea in a drip‐fed manner over an extended period of time.

‘Although this may have been an adopted practice in the past, we consider it to now be inappropriate due to the unacceptable risk it poses to the safety of beach users.

‘These risks extend to the broader Tweed economy as it coincides with the well‐reported high volume of shark attacks and shark activity within the northern rivers region.

‘Moreover, this stretch of beach between Cabarita and Kingscliff is no longer the scarcely populated area it used to be. As you would be aware, development and population along this stretch has considerably increased over the last 15 years with a further spike in the last two years.

The location of the burial at Casuarina.

The location of the burial at Casuarina.

‘It continues to intensify with current high volumes of construction activity and the anticipated approval of the final “central” stage of the Casuarina Beach development, adjacent to the shopping centre. This stage is also adjacent to the burial pit of the whale carcass,’ he said.

Mr Logue said he’d been told that to remove such risks, Gold Coast City Council ‘removes all whale carcasses from the beach and disposes of them in the council tip’.

‘However, I am also advised that whale carcasses in Ballina shire are buried on the beach in the same manner as this one. The shark-attack statistics and subsequent media coverage between these two LGAs over the last several years is stark.

‘Accordingly, to remove the risks posed through the attraction of sharks to the area by whale carcasses I propose that all whale carcasses or other carcasses of significant mass are removed from the beach and disposed of at a council tip.’

Mr Logue has asked Tweed shire deputy mayor Gary Bagnall to lobby for such a policy and to ‘arrange for the removal and disposal of this whale carcass and any residue in the pit from its present position on Casuarina Beach to a council tip as a matter of urgency’.

Cr Bagnall said he would ask fellow councillors at this month’s meeting that ‘we develop a policy to cover the beaching of sea animals and large kills of fish ‘so we have clear direction how to respond to these types of incidents in the future’.

He said locals had expressed concern over the burial site and he had ‘asked the council to investigate the appropriateness of the site’.

‘I believe that the Gold Coast council removes dead animals from their beaches because of the population there.

‘It would be appreciated if incidents, such as this, could reported to our council in future.  Our council now has to deal with the concerns of the community and the council was left in the dark’.

 


4 responses to “Whale burial on Tweed beach raises a stink with locals”

  1. PeterL says:

    More at risk are the homes of those who thought it was a good idea to build in the sand dunes of Salt and Casuarina Beach. What will they do when the big tides come in ?

  2. Len Heggarty says:

    The whale, scientifically known as the Cetacea, began as a living species in existence more than 600million years ago.
    How many whales have died in the ocean since 600 millions years ago?
    Why was the baby whale not towed out to sea so the sharks could feed. The sharks are the scavengers of the ocean and the burial deprived the sharks of a job. They are unemployed out there. They clean up the ocean.

  3. Phaedra says:

    Forget about health risks – why couldn’t Sea World take this small whale out to sea again? There are procedures on how to do it. I have heard that in the past Sea World deliberately let a whale die that could have been taken out to sea because they wanted tissue samples. Not sure if this is true but that is what I heard from someone with first hand experience of them.

    If we are a compassionate society and this can be done why aren’t we doing it?
    Lots of videos on youtube e.g.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9FhQ6hwwnk – Mexican navy guided 30′ long 6T whale out to sea
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syNucX2QzvE – Beached Canadian Orca whale weighing 4-5 T helped back to sea
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QryvN20HABo – 11 beached pilot whales in N.Z. helped back to sea using heavy machinery
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bP_z8ljunVw – a juvenile 2T Orca while 15′ long beached 18 hrs but taken out to sea using heavy machinery and whale rescue pontoons (this one is very emotional)

  4. Peter brush says:

    Taking all of that organic matter to the dump is a really stupid idea! What a waste of resources, not just the carcass but the transport costs and so on. In the dunes it’s available to decomposers, but out to sea to be eaten would be best!
    and to the wingers, worried about sharks being attracted (unlikely and unproven), suck it up! It’s their ocean, you are just a visitor playing by their her rules!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers and is brought to you by this week's sponsor, Ballina Byron Gateway Airport.