20.2 C
Byron Shire
May 6, 2021

Kingy resort ‘is not an eco-village’

Latest News

From go to whoa – Norco Primex expo covers it all

Norco and Primex are bringing a three-day sustainable farming and primary industry expo to you.

Other News

Ballina Shire for the next 4 years: time to have your say

The Ballina Shire Council’s Draft Delivery Program and Operational Plan 2021/22 - 2024/25 will be on exhibition until the 28th of May with provisions for public feedback. 

Byron Bay wins season opener against Mullum Giants

  Ross Kendall The local league derby is always  and the Byron Bay Red Devils have won the first game of...

No air for Ben

Rhonda Ansiewicz, Federal Stop giving Franklin air time. Mayor Richardson, in his usual fashion, joins up with his mate Franklin...

Correcting the record

Duncan Dey, Greens candidate for mayor 2021–24 I wish to correct the record for those who listened to Thursday’s Council...

Rous Chair Keith Williams looks ahead

Since the Dunoon Dam was shelved, Rous County Council has put a new draft of the Future Water Project...

Dreaming about a bucket-list surfing and wellness holiday?

Have you always dreamt about traveling to exotic ‘bucket-list’ beach destinations like Bali or Vanuatu… or are your dreams...

Luis Feliu

Opposition to controversial plans for a $105 million resort on prime public beachfront land just south of Kingscliff by speakers at yesterday’s Planning Assessment Commission hearing was unanimous.

Twenty-two people spoke against the plans by Leighton Holdings, which has secured a 99-year-lease over the 44-hectare site known as Lot 490 between Kingscliff and Salt.

Locals have for years fought against the plans by the state, which had promised beforehand to use the income from the development for the upkeep of the Tweed’s coastal Crown lands and reserves.

The planning department has recommended approval for the resort on Casuarina Way, but knocked back the number of originally proposed units and bungalows from 180 to 127 because of concerns over environmental impact.

While some speakers welcomed a reduction in the resort’s scale, others said its density should be reduced even more or shouldn’t go ahead at all because of its environmental impact.

The PAC heard how the development of the site had been mired in controversy from the outset. Locals said they had fought over the years contentious plans by prospective developers for a casino and a 600-room high-rise hotel on the bush site.

Around 90 people attended the hearing before commissioners Paul Forward and Abigail Goldberg.

Kingscliff resident and spokesman for the Northern Rivers Guardians, Scott Sledge, told the hearing that his group, with 500 members, offered three options for the site.

Leave it alone

The first option was to leave the land as it is, with protection for wildlife habitat; the second was for establishing walking and cycling tracks to picnic shelters for passive recreation; and the third was to reduce the density of the resort to around 50 units.

Mr Sledge said such a smaller resort ‘should be truly “ecological” with standalone provision of electricity, water catchment and composting toilets’.

He said all the ‘facilities’ of the larger resort would be ‘duplications of those already existing at Salt/Casuarina to the south and Kingscliff to the north’.

He also said that even by reducing the scale of the resort down from the ‘massive’ 180 units to 127, the density and style of the accommodation would be ‘more reminiscent of Changi Prison during WW2 than ‘’celebration of beach culture’’ as per Leighton’s vision’.

He also said that ‘only an advertising agent would describe these cheek-by-jowl ticky-tacky boxes as “bungalows”’.

‘With the tiniest of eaves to keep the sun off, these units will become ovens in summer,’ he said.

‘The resort could be safari-tent style: low-cost, low-impact accommodation connected by walking/cycling tracks, with all servicing done using electric vehicles such as golf carts.’

Mr Sledge also took aim at the use of the word ‘ecological’ by the developer, saying that ‘just calling a project an eco-village doesn’t make it one’.

‘What is ecological about large swathes of bush being bulldozed to make way for house sites, driveways, facilities such as swimming pools and parking lots?’

He said, ‘Crown land belongs to the state, which holds it in trust for the people, and should not be allotted to private interests unless it can be shown there will there is some major benefit to the people’.

Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.


  1. Enough already

    No Benefit No use (and I don’t mean State Government financial benefit)

    Walkways, bike-ways, tents these uses seem to be (on the face of it) a benefit

    This site must be protected
    Politicians need to understand the depth of community support for environmental protection


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Greater Sydney goes into COVID related lockdown

NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian has just announced that greater Sydney area will go into lockdown until next Monday.

Board defends its management of Mullum Rural Co-op

The issue of potential fraud and financial mismanagement was a key part of the response from Mullumbimby Rural Co-op board, and Chair Ross Tucker,...

An operetta and children’s theatre for NORPA

NOPRA has announced recipients of the theatre company’s two artist residencies.

Dam doesn’t give a damn about koalas

The proposed Dunoon Dam is still a possibility, though it has been voted against twice by the members of Rous County Council. Now information has emerged which presents another reason to shut down the threat of the dam once and for all.