12.7 C
Byron Shire
May 14, 2021

New Acland coal mine assessment ‘deeply flawed’

Latest News

Michael Lyon elected as Byron Mayor

Owing to the resignation of former Mayor at the end of April, a vote was held today to replace Simon Richardson, until the next election

Other News

Global predicament

Dudley Leggett – Director of Sustainability Research Institute, Suffolk Park Phillip Frazer’s article, (Echo 6 January) is an excellent summary of...

Exotic and hybrid

Dailan Pugh, Byron Bay I was shocked to see the abundant exotic and hybrid plantings at Byron’s new bus interchange. As...

How much do you know about koalas?

How well do you know your koala facts? Test your knowledge at the June 2 Koala Hard Quiz in Mullumbimby.

Creative carbon capture

Desmond Bellamy – Special Projects Coordinator, PETA Australia, Byron Bay Last week, the Australian government pledged half a billion dollars for ‘clean’...

Linnaeus Estate DA raises concerns for residents

Community concern over the current development application (DA: 10.2021.170.1) for Linnaeus Estate in Broken Head has led to detailed analysis of the DA.

False impressions

Fast Buck$, Coorabell I was under the impression that, upon the mayor resigning, the deputy mayor would automatically get the...

Queensland’s New Acland Mine proposal uses flawed economic modelling designed to overstate potential benefits of the expansion and neglects to mention impacts on air quality and health for surrounding residents, according to the Australia Institute.

The New Acland coal mine is applying to expand its operations in one of Australia’s most productive agricultural regions, the Darling Downs.

The mine has been controversial since it began, in its impact on the agricultural economy, and in clearing out the town of Acland where now only one resident remains.

Local complaints about air quality, noise, and impacts on agriculture are regularly brushed off by the proponents who claim these impacts are offset by the mine’s economic benefits.

However, analysis submitted to the Queensland government on Monday by The Australia Institute has found that these economic claims are overstated.

‘Rather than simply working out the costs and benefits of this project, New Hope Coal try to justify their claims with economic modelling described as “biased” and “abused” by the Australian Bureau of Statistics and the Productivity Commission,’ said economist and submission author Rod Campbell.

‘Claims that this project could inject $17 billion into the Queensland economy are completely untrue. These estimates assume there is infinite labour and arable land in Queensland,’ Mr Campbell said.

‘The Queensland Planning Department’s own guidelines recommend against this sort of assessment,’ he added.

‘The New Acland project is portrayed as the “major employer”, but the assessment points out that while mining employs just 2.5 per cent of the Darling Downs workforce, agriculture employs 10 per cent, five times the Queensland average. Negative impacts on agricultural employment are downplayed, while the mine’s impacts are overstated.

‘Air quality and health issues are not factored into the economic assessment at all.

‘Particulate pollution from coal mining and transport has an impact on human health, its cost is carried through to the economy in increased health costs and reduced worker productivity. There is no consideration of this in the New Acland economic assessment, although the issue has been well documented,’ Mr Campbell said

‘The Queensland government needs to get serious about assessing the merit of coal projects before waving them through.

‘Until the New Acland project can show that the royalties it would generate outweigh the damage that it will cause to agriculture in the Darling Downs, the project should be rejected,’ Mr Campbell said.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

1 COMMENT

  1. It is not transparent what royalties will flow from this mine expansion. Part of the mine are on old titles where the royalties flow back to the owners, New Hope.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Locals question placing homes in areas of inundation risk

It is where the community fought off Club Med and it is once again in the spotlight as the current owners, Elements, are seeking to have the zoning of the environmentally sensitive area in Bayshore Drive changed from tourism to residential

Go straight to the source on the Future Water Project

Rous County Council has announced a series of information days to be held this month where the community can ‘drop in’ and find out more about the revised draft Future Water Project 2060.

Free mental health workshop for Byron businesses

Business owners in Byron Shire are invited to attend a free 'Healthy Mindset' workshop aimed at providing them with resources and tools to improve mental health and wellbeing, as well as the opportunity to connect with other business owners.

Trainspotters

Jillian Spring, Billinudgel In the article –  At a gathering of trainspotters, 21/4/21 by David Lisle, re Tweed Council Rail Trail, it is noted in...