21.1 C
Byron Shire
March 6, 2021

Councils urged to merge under new state plan

Latest News

New Greens team

Matthew O’Reilly President of CABS and a proud member of the NEW Byron Greens team It seems that some readers have...

Other News

No more MOs for Tweed Shire

In a move that may have surprised some council watchers, it was the conservative councillors who voted in favour of keeping multiple occupancies (MO) in Tweed Shire.

Cartoon of the week – 3 March, 2021

We love to receive letters, but not every letter will be published; the publication of letters is at the discretion of the online and print letters editors.

Lennox Rise development clears another hurdle

The massive new residential development planned west of Epiq in Lennox Head continued its progress towards becoming reality at the last Ballina Shire Council meeting.

Lifting the lid on plans to build a retirement village in Ewingsdale

The letter sent to the residents of Ewingsdale last year by holiday park owner Ingenia seemed fairly innocuous at first glance...

Interview with Janet Swain

Janet Swain is 14. She’s in love with the tragic and brilliant cellist Jacquleine DuPré. But one day her mother arrives home with a bassoon.

Suffolk Park residents pressure councillors over pump track

Councillors, Michael Lyon and Jeanette Martin, met Suffolk Park residents on Saturday to hear concerns around the proposed pump bike track, which is slated for the Linda Vidler park.

NSW premier Mike Baird has indicated he might support medical marijuana. Photo AAP
NSW premier Mike Baird has taken a carrot and stick approach to the issue of council amalgamations. Photo AAP

Chris Dobney

Tweed and Lismore councils have welcomed a state government plan that offers struggling metropolitan and regional councils financial incentives to merge with their neighbours, even though council mergers are not guaranteed to produce budgetary savings.

In a new announcement on Wednesday, the NSW government said it was not ruling out forcing local councils to merge, but hopes funding sweeteners will be enough to convince them to amalgamate.

As part of the government’s so-called Fit for Future package, Premier Mike Baird committed $258 million in incentives for the state’s 152 councils to merge.

Councils in the Greater Sydney area could get up to $22.5 million each for merging, whereas regional councils would get just $13.5 million.

Mr Baird says more than a third of the state’s councils are facing financial problems and will need help to join forces with neighbouring councils.

‘Clearly there needs to be less councils,’ he told reporters in Sydney.

Current NOROC president, Tweed mayor Barry Longland and his predecessor Lismore mayor Jenny Dowell are in agreement about the need for mergers, with Cr Longland calling the incentive payments ‘substantial’ and Cr Dowell admitting she had already been in ‘blue sky’ talks with Kyogle Council about a possible merger.

An earlier report issued by former local government minister Don Page highlighted Kyogle Council as one that would be in significant financial straits if it did not find a merger partner soon.

It recommended Kyogle merge with either Lismore City or Richmond Valley Council.

But Kyogle mayor Danielle Mulholland, together Richmond Valley mayor Ernie Bennett, Ballina mayor David Wright and Byron mayor Simon Richardson have so far been silent on the prospects of a merger.

Similarly Cr Longland would not be drawn on the prospect of a Ballina/Bryon/Tweed mega council, telling local media simply that there were ‘lots of options to be considered.

But he said overall that he was happy with the package, ‘particularly the funds which will be made available to councils to assist with preparing for and implementing the Fit for the Future reform agenda’.

Cr Longland said in a statement that it provided ‘a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for the sector to reform itself with support from the state government, so that future generations will have the infrastructure and service delivery to provide for prosperous communities.’

‘Like the government, we want our community to have confidence that their council is financially sound, operating efficiently and in a strong position to guide community growth and deliver quality services.

‘It is great to hear that the government will provide assistance and support to councils to help them achieve these important outcomes.

‘In particular, we welcome the potential savings for councils when they invest in local infrastructure, the funding to get new regional Joint Organisations up and running and the benefits for councils through reductions in red tape and duplication,’ Cr Longland said.

He added that as president of NOROC, he was keen to explore ‘all regional opportunities with our partners and ensure we continue to build strong regional collaboration in the northern rivers.’

‘The elected councillors of the Tweed and staff will be actively working, both locally and with our regional neighbours, to explore the opportunities these reforms present and will complete a proposal by 30 June next year,’ Cr Longland said.

‘Naturally, this process will involve community consultation so we can work together to ensure we maintain strong local communities into the future,’ he added.

Forced mergers not ruled out

At yesterday’s press conference launching the move, Mr Baird was asked if he would consider changing former premier Barry O’Farrell’s policy of not forcing councils to merge should his funding plan not be widely taken up.

‘If we get to the end of the process and councils aren’t there and they’re not fit for the future, well we have to consider what options we can work with them,’ he said.

‘Because it is clear that the current position is not sustainable.’

Mr Baird was also asked if the amalgamations might lead to job cuts.

‘I expect as part of this process there will be less people picking up pencils and more people fixing up local roads,’ he said.

The package was welcomed by the president of Local Government NSW (LGNSW), Cr Keith Rhoades, who said the organisation had been ‘actively involved in the review process from the beginning, and we are pleased the government listened to LGNSW’s calls for a greater incentives package to help councils navigate the reform process.’

‘The government’s package is consistent with about 75 per cent of LGNSW’s submission to the Review Panel report on behalf of NSW councils,’ he said.

He welcomed that there will be no forced amalgamations and added LGNSW would ‘be a focus’ of the LGNSW annual conference next month.

‘Amalgamation by stealth’

But the state Labor opposition has savaged the move.

Shadow local government minister Sophie Cotsis said the Fit for the Future policy was ‘nothing more than forcing the amalgamation of councils across NSW by stealth’.

‘The Liberals are setting in place a framework that will force the amalgamation of councils across NSW – there is no choice for councils other than putting forward amalgamation proposals now or being forced to later,’ Ms Cotsis said.

‘The devil in this policy is in the details – the $1 billion in funding is accounting trickery and councils are being put on a path to having no choice but amalgamation,’ she added.

Ms Cotsis said the government ‘had over three years to talk to local communities about their vision for local government in NSW but they palmed the responsibility off to a panel and now with the election clock ticking down have rushed out this policy to get them past the next election.’

‘Local communities can have no confidence that the Liberal Government is acting in good faith or in their best interests.

‘Mike Baird let the cat out of the bag in his press conference when he said that ‘we will have to look at other options’ if local councils don’t sign up to the government’s amalgamation policy.

‘Mike Baird must come clean about the $1 billion he claims to be providing for this policy – more than 70 per cent of this figure is accounting trickery in “cuts to red tape” and cheaper interest rate loans to local councils.

Cheaper loans

As part of the plan the government is offering councils cheaper loans, which it says could save them up to $600 million, and reductions in red tape – estimated to save up to $100 million.

Mr Baird says the reforms will help councils reduce rates and deliver much-needed infrastructure.

Councils will have until June 2015 to decide if they will merge and take up the government funding.

– with AAP


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

9 COMMENTS

  1. Warning, one of the biggest problems we had with CSG development in Tara was that when the government forced the councils here to amalgamate, we lost all control over the council. Our cash reserves in the Tara Council all disappeared, and where we had the lowest rates we found our rates increasing at the highest percentage of all the other former council areas. We were ripped off.
    It also meant that where small areas once had a good deal of clout with their local council, now each locality is so small the council simply ignores local issues.
    The timing was convenient for the CSG industry, they were able to exploit the corruption that seems so common in local councils with all their Old Boy networks to get permission to trash our roads and waterways. The anti-CSG movement must oppose this with vigor, lose democratic power in your councils and you lose everything.
    All said and done Council Amalgamation has been a lose – lose situation. I have yet to see one positive thing for the ratepayers to come from it.
    If you want to streamline government in Australia abolish the states, small local councils and one Federal government is all that is required, and you will save far more money.

  2. “If you want to streamline government in Australia abolish the states, small local councils and one Federal government is all that is required, and you will save far more money.”
    Spot-ON !! Fewer elections, fewer politicians, fewer layers of bureaucracy, national standards, and better resourced local government regions.

  3. We on the Tweed have another dilemma, why would we wish to amalgamate with Lismore where the sensibility of amalgamating would be with the GCCC, but there’s a border between us.
    Back to Graeme last sentence; “If you want to streamline government in Australia abolish the states, small local councils and one Federal government is all that is required, and you will save far more money.”

  4. While I have seen council mergers work reasonably well on the Mornington Peninsula in Victoria, my big concern here is that the Byron Shire has a vastly different culture than Tweed and/or Ballina. We would very quickly lose control of protecting what we have and I fear massive tourism and residential developments would be inevitable. I know our Mayor Simon Richardson and our most of our councillors have a total love and respect for this region and will do all they can to keep us moving slow and considered into a sustainable future.

  5. Don’t be fooled, forced amalgamations were a disaster here in Queensland, I am told also in Victoria.
    Local, grassroots democracy is well worth keeping.

  6. Combining councils in large cities like Melbourne proved to be very effective in reducing back office costs. I see no reason why it wouldn’t be equally effective among small councils in rural areas – maybe even more effective. Anything that improves cost effectiveness has to be a good thing.

  7. Another distrusting move by the Liberals, I 100% agree, the communities should be standing up to maintain their local councils as absolutely uniquely aware and supportive of them, alongside the power of the people to protect our individual human rights with issues such as CSG, we need LOCAL and need LOSE the STATE
    !!!!!!!!! These radical moves, are extremely scary for the future of Australians once you are aware of the end motives !

  8. “Cost effectiveness” rates fairly low on my list. I am happy to be a bit poor, but rich in clean air, magnificent nature, clean water, sustainable farming lands, including its native birds, animals and people. These things are price-less. What local people on the ground know is extremely valuable local knowledge. State government is far less relevent than local government. Where I grew up in the Upper Hunter, when our local Council amalgamated, suddenly there was very little interest by the Council 50 ks away to upkeep local infrastructure and develop our local interests. It may work in cities, but definitely not in regional and rural areas which have their unique cultural, environmental and economic fabric and knowledge.

  9. I see on http://www.tweeddailynews.com.au/news/tweed-council-to-be-gutted-under-new-mega-council-/1845592/ dated April 2013 Mayor Longland was outraged at the idea of amalgamation of councils. And now he is in favour of them. What is going on? At that time he said:
    “Tweed will be gutted. We will be relegated to an outpost of Lismore with all major service functions heading south.”
    Cr Longland said Tweed would lose most of its functions.
    “Up to 300 positions are at risk if this proposal proceeds because we are the Tweed’s largest employer,” he said.
    “Services set to go are our water and sewer, which represent approximately 37% of our business; our transport/road network planning; strategic regional and sub-regional planning; corporate services; and waste and environmental management.”
    Cr Longland said it was a “slap in the face”, considering the council’s record for financial sustainability compared with Lismore.
    “The panel says the Tweed will go on but the reality is that Tweed Shire Council cannot survive under this model with this drastic loss of services. We will be relegated to just a works depot,” Cr Longland said.
    “Additionally, regional economic development will be driven out of Lismore and business rates in the Tweed will soar.
    “Our capacity to influence service delivery, strategic planning and environmental outcomes will be lost.”
    He said it was an amalgamation by stealth as the Tweed will be left just a shell and unable to function in its own right and was “the first among equals on the Northern Rivers, not Lismore as the report proposes”.
    “We are the largest regional centre outside the greater Sydney area, the gateway to NSW and are one of eight regional cities identified in NSW,” he said.
    He said the report recognised that one size does not fit all.
    “Well, this doesn’t fit us and we don’t want to be part of the Northern Rivers County Council,” he said.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Naming Ben Franklin

Cecily McGee, Mullumbimby It's very misleading for the Byron Shire Echo to repeatedly give Ben Franklin free media coverage,  as in the article about the Mullumbimby...

A little bit of COVID…

Mandy Nolan has stated in The Echo, ‘For 30 years I’ve fought to give a voice to the voiceless in our community, now I’m...

Democracy

Jo Faith, Newtown Thank you all at The Echo for upholding independent journalism. For readers and activists concerned about the demise of democracy, do take the...

Rape, the law, and naming the man responsible

David Heilpern tackles key questions relating to the allegation of rape by a cabinet minister.