24.3 C
Byron Shire
December 5, 2022

Pool owners beware

Latest News

So you think someone needs a puppy for Christmas?

If you’re thinking about giving your loved one a puppy as a gift this Christmas, Dogs Australia urges you to think twice.

Other News

Migrant workers exploited and ripped off

Unions NSW say that a firewall between the Fair Work Ombudsman and the Department of Home Affairs is needed to protect migrant workers from deportation when they report exploitation, as new data reaffirms rife underpayment across Australia.  

Bangalow Bread: great bread, in Bangalow

Simon Haslam Yep, the name says it all, Bangalow Bread make bread in Bangalow. But as anyone who’s perused the glutinous...

Cinema: Seriously Red

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0RCj3-Pz50 If you’re a fan of Dolly Parton, then this just might be your happy place for the summer. Seriously...

Vehicles on beaches

Some Ballina councillors have their heads in the sand about vehicles on beaches! I ask them to think about...

NSW Forestry challenged over failed forestry practices in precedent-setting case

What makes bushfires worse, causes native species collapse and creates forest dieback?

Pod homes for Lismore ready for residents

The Southern Cross University temporary housing site is now officially operational and serving as a home for flood affected Lismore locals.

Pool owners, council’s reaching for your wallet.

My wife and I built a swimming pool on our property some years ago. The construction was approved by Byron Shire Council and a final occupation certificate issued. We both believe in pool safety as far too many drownings, mostly of children, have occurred in inadequately fenced and gated pools. We were happy therefore to register our pool as part of the NSW government’s swimming pool register in accordance with section 30B of the Swimming Pools Act 1992.

I recently received a letter from Council informing me that Council would be inspecting our pool on February 23 to check compliance, fences, gates, etc. So far so good; I have no problem allowing inspectors onto my property to do their job.

At the bottom of the letter was a paragraph headed: Recovery of cost of entry and inspection. This went on to say that I would be charged $140 for the initial inspection and a further $100 if a reinspection was required. I reread the letter several times, thinking I had misunderstood, but no, it meant exactly what I thought it did.

Every pool owner in the Shire will be charged this onerous inspection fee. It is a rort, a joke. I didn’t ask the council to come and inspect my pool, though I am quite happy for them to do so at their cost. I cannot see why we have to fund the inspection by subsidising council salaries and I refuse to do so.

All pool owners should make a stand, refuse to pay this money-grabbing inspection fee. We pay rates – don’t they cover council costs?

Ron Olesen, Ocean Shores


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.


  1. Ron you will have to lay the blame on this one at the feet of your outgoing local member, Don Page. It was Mr Page who introduced the program on behalf of the state government, then put the onus on councils to conduct the inspections, without giving them any funds to do so. – Ed

  2. Queensland already play this game Anna Blights bunch bought this little fund raising perk in. If you have an investment prooperty with a pool you have to do it every time you change Tennants how’s that for a scam. Gov backed too.

  3. I actually think that is a fair call for council to recover costs. Why should all the ratepayers have to subsidise pool inspections for the minority who own Pools. $140 ins’t that much in the scheme of things.

  4. $140 for a certificate of 3 years isn’t much to pay for peace of mind. That’s just over $45 per year, or about 12 cents per day. pennies when you think about it. The other option would be for council to include it into your rates bill. either way you’re still paying for it.

    What you should be more concerned about is that over 90% of pool fail their first inspection. Some pools taking anywhere between 2-5 re-inspections. Councils also have the power to issue orders and directions (as well as fines) if your pool is deemed unsafe. Once council issues a direction, they’ll need to complete their process and no one can get involved – including private certifiers.

    Engage a private pool safety inspection company that know what they’re doing and you can skirt around the red tape. Sure, its going to cost you more upfront, but it will cost you less when you consider the number of inspections council would do vs the private certifiers. Councils don’t give you advice or tell you how to fix it. Many of the private guys do however.

    If you have any further questions please let me know



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Handball bouncing kids back after the floods

Following the 2022 floods, Albert Park Public School teacher Troy Davies had an idea to bring about a bit of much-needed fun into students’ lives by suggesting the handball competition to beat them all.

Pianos delivered, for the people!

Following the devastating 2022 floods, Pianos for the People answered the call to bring music to the people of the Northern Rivers. 

Migrant workers exploited and ripped off

Unions NSW say that a firewall between the Fair Work Ombudsman and the Department of Home Affairs is needed to protect migrant workers from deportation when they report exploitation, as new data reaffirms rife underpayment across Australia.  

Council imposes development restrictions on Linnaeus

The plan to rezone part of Broken Head’s Linnaeus Estate in a bid to prevent further development proposals on the site has taken a step forward, with Byron councillors unanimously supporting the move.