22 C
Byron Shire
January 22, 2022

World Heritage parks ‘put at risk’ by law changes

Latest News

Boat people we are

We here in this country, now called Australia, need to be reminded that we started off as ‘boat people’. The...

Other News

Cartoon of the week – 19 January, 2022

The Echo loves your letters and is proud to provide a community forum on the issues that matter most to our readers and the people of the NSW north coast. So don't be a passive reader, send us your epistles.

Bioenergy precaution

The notion of ‘Green Energy’ has recently excited business investors and no doubt the public. We need positive solutions...

The Greens launch NurseKeeper for nurses and paramedics

The Greens have written to the Premier to ask him to immediately introduce ‘NurseKeeper’ to urgently introduce pandemic pay and bonuses for nurses and paramedics. 

COVID strategy

Our PM and premier have decided to fall back on the old ‘Dunkirk Strategy’: Retreat, withdraw and claim a...

Mandy Nolan’s Soapbox: Emergency response for our emergency responders

We need our nurses. Right now, they are the most important workforce in the country. Not politicians or real estate agents or tradies or miners. Nurses. Paramedics. Hospital doctors.

Ocean Shores DA threat to biodiversity, say residents

A proposal to subdivide one lot (2,097m2) into three lots, and build two dwellings and three secondary dwellings, in densly forested riparian land in North Ocean Shores would create ‘Gold-Coast-style overdevelopment’, say residents.

Protection for the north coast’s World Heritage national parks and communities surrounding them would be limited under under the Abbott government’s proposed changes to federal environmental law.

The Environmental Defenders Office (EDO) also says the controversial plan by cabinet to repeal a key provision of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (the EPBC Act) would deny access to the courts by communities and environmental organisations.

The coalition’s move follows the successful legal challenge against the contentious mega coal mine in Queensland proposed by Indian company Adani.

Abbott ministers fuming at the court decision then accused conservation groups of ‘sabotaging’ the project.

But the Environmental Defenders Office (EDO) says any repeal of the provisions in the Act was a retrogade step.

EDO northern rivers branch principal lawyer Sue Higginson said it was a fundamental aspect of environmental law for communities to be able to hold ‘governments to account’.

Ms Higginson said it was exactly those provisions the government was set on removing which protected the north coast’s World Heritage national parks if they should be threatened by any proposed major development or mining project.

Ms Higginson told Echonetdaily that north coast miner Metgasco once proposed a controversial coal-seam-gas pipeline from the northern rivers to Queensland, via the Border Ranges National Park, which had since been abandoned.

She said it was an example of a project which would have fallen under the provisions of the law proposed to be ditched.

‘They are the exact laws which protect them (World Heritage national parks),’ she said.

’So if any mining company such as Metgasco has a project which impacts on the parks, north coast communities may be affected by the repeal of these laws, in that access (to the courts) will be made substantially more difficult,’ she said.

EDO NSW executive director Jeff Smith said the provision in question, section 487, currently extends access to the courts ‘to Australian people and organisations who have a recent history of involvement in conservation or research’.

‘The provision rests on the public nature of environmental law – that is, the right of the community to enforce Australia’s environmental laws and to hold decision-makers and corporations to account,’ Mr Smith said.

‘The announcement about repealing section 487 has come in the wake of the victory by the Mackay Conservation Group in the Carmichael Adani case. EDO NSW represented the small community group in these proceedings.

‘In this matter – and this is the crucial part – the Federal Environment Minister conceded that he had been in error in not taking into account the impact of the approval on two nationally threatened species. The Minister wrote to the Federal Court, asking it to set aside his decision.

‘We see the Carmichael case as an example of the Federal environmental laws working well.

‘In stark contrast, the Federal government has described the outcome as “legal sabotage”, “lawfare” and “vigilante litigation”.

‘These claims are without merit and quite extraordinary in light of the Minister’s concession that he got it wrong.

‘They also fly in the face of the operation of the EPBC Act. Over the past 15 years, there have only been around 30 judicial review challenges to decisions of the Minister on controlled actions under the Act.

‘This is out of over 5,000 actions referred to the Minister, with only 800 of those proceeding to the approval stage. In short, this means that less than half of one percent of decisions on controlled actions under the EPBC Act are challenged in court.

‘More broadly, there is no evidence to suggest the Act needs to be changed. In speaking about the very provision that the government proposes to repeal, a fulsome 10-year independent review of the Act said: “these provisions have created no difficulties and should be maintained”.

‘This conclusion should come as no surprise to lawyers and those familiar with the judicial system. All courts rightly have mechanisms in place to ensure that people cannot bring matters without merit – so-called “frivolous or vexatious proceedings”.

Effect of the proposed repeal

‘The mooted repeal would return Australia’s Federal environmental laws to the common law test of standing. This test only allows people who are directly affected or aggrieved by a development – such as those with a proprietary interest – to take legal action.

‘The development of environmental law in Australia – predominantly since the 1960s – has come about in no small part due to the inadequacy of the common law to protect the environment.

‘The proposed repeal would also mean that the community at large would have no recourse where the Federal Environment Minister makes a legal error – as was acknowledged in the Carmichael case.

‘And it would shift the focus of any Court proceedings to whether a person had a right to be there, rather than focusing on potential harm to the environment.

‘The EPBC Act is currently based on the assumption that all Australians have an interest in the health of the environment and the protection of our iconic places – the Great Barrier Reef, the Kimberley, the Tarkine – and the proper enforcement of our national environmental laws.

‘It also allows communities and conservation groups to act to save threatened species, as occurred with the litigation to stop Japanese whaling conducted by EDO NSW a few years back, representing Humane Society International.

‘The proposed repeal of section 487 would throw all this into doubt, turning back Australia’s environmental laws and returning us to a time when the environment was not recognised as requiring protection and communities were sidelined before the law.

‘This would be a retrograde step and would operate to the detriment of Australia’s environment. Hopefully, reason and common sense will prevail and the integrity of Australia’s environmental laws is maintained,’ Mr Smith said.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

2 COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Israel and Palestine

As an apologist for Israel, Michael Burd (Letters, 12 January) conveniently ignores the harsh truth of Israel’s brutal oppression, while claiming there are two...

Greens Mandy Nolan to hold community forum in support of nurses and paramedics

Locally and across the state nurses, and paramedics are struggling in the face of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic as they are being asked to do double shifts and manage effectively in health system that is struggling to cope. This has led to an increasing number of nurses and paramedics resigning.

NSW COVID update on COVID deaths – vax stats and comorbidities

NSW Premier Dominic Perrottet again opened his COVID update with condolences to families who have lost loved ones, and thanks to the  ‘inspirational work of our health workers'.

January 21 National Cabinet on Omicron, RATs, vax and treatments

Prime Minister Scott Morrison has issued a media release about yesterday's meeting of the National Cabinet.