21.2 C
Byron Shire
December 4, 2021

Main Arm Telstra tower unwelcome

Latest News

COVID update December 3: One new case and advice for international travellers

One new case of COVID-19 was reported for Northern NSW Local Health District (NNSWLHD) in the 24 hours to...

Other News

Laurel Lodge open for community housing

North Coast Community Housing (NCCH) has officially opened 12 refurbished fit-for-purpose homes in the former Lismore Base Hospital accommodation known as Laurel Lodge.

Cats

To quote Greta, ‘How dare they?!’ SBS is running an advertising campaign for Airbnb, encouraging visitors to take their...

Lismore saw one new case of COVID-19

A new case of COVID-19 was confirmed in Lismore in the 24 hours to 8pm 30 November.

Mandy Nolan’s Soapbox: Crossing Over

I miss travelling. I miss the thrill of going somewhere new. The last few years feels like we’ve had no adventures. No interesting and foreign lands to explore.  It’s been all about staying at home. Thanks to Annastacia Palaszczuk, going to Queensland feels a bit like going overseas. I’ve had to cross the border for work a few times lately. 

Women Who Lead team focus on housing and environment

Letitia Kelly is heading the Independent Group F, Women Who Lead ticket in the upcoming Tweed Shire Council elections.

Why not both

The tender for the first section of the Rail Trail starting from Murwillumbah indicates that it is not more...

Not convinced of the safety regulations, Main Arm residents want a halt to a planned NBN tower in the village. Photo supplied
Not convinced of the safety regulations, Main Arm residents want a halt to a planned tower in the village. Photo supplied

Residents gathered on Sunday to protest against Telstra’s proposed microwave ‘data only’ antenna for its facility in Main Arm village.

The group claim it will ‘constitute a serious health hazard and do nothing to improve mobile coverage.’

Resident Nino MacDonald said, ‘The Telstra proposal will effectively irradiate an area within a radius of 50 metres with 10.15 mW/m2 of microwave radiation; equivalent to holding a phone next to your head 24/7.

‘Our concern is that the highest radiation would include a daycare centre, the Main Arm store and cafe as well as several residences.’

‘Under current planning laws, Telcos are not required to seek development approval for work undertaken on their land. However owing to ongoing community pressure, construction, which was supposed to have commenced in early January, has been temporarily delayed. According to Visionstream, Telstra’s agents, the matter has been ‘escalated’ and is now before Mitch Fifield, federal communications minister. Residents have also called on Justine Elliott MP to intercede on their behalf.’


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

5 COMMENTS

  1. Could the Echo kindly note this is not an NBN Tower and change the heading to this peice, it is a Telstra data only 1 meter , roof mounted antenna , the radiation that will be emitted however will be twice that of the 50 meter NBN tower that residents of Coorabell are presently opposing , both these developments have evaded the scrutiny of the development application process because government has abdicated its responsibility for responsible law making and handed regulation to the Telcos where it does not belong, leaving residents with no recourse of meaningful objection.

    As a consequence we have the situation in Main Arm of a high intensity antenna , extremely close to sensitive areas which will chronically expose many members of the public to microwave radiation, such a situation is not justified based merely on the convenience it provides.

  2. The lady on the left is holding up a sign with an Ionizing radiation symbol on it.
    Radio towers do not emit ionizing radiation, they emit non-ionizing radiation.
    There is no nuclear radiation hazard here.

    Might be an idea to fully understand what they are protesting about first, if they are to have any credibility?

    I agree though, towers should probably not be placed so close to residential areas, to be on the safe side.
    The antennas will be 50m above ground though, so that reduces the field strength considerably.

    • The antenna will NOT be 50 meters above ground because there is NOT a tower , it is a roof mounted antenna which is 4 meters above ground , this makes the impact greater in the first 50 meters (using telstra’s figures)

  3. Does anyone know if this plan moved forward and where the exact location of the antenna would be?
    Thinking of moving to that area, just near that Telstra cabin and wondering if that would me a health hazard?
    Thanks!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Last mayoral candidates Q and A: are you a landlord?

Here at The Echo we have seen and heard the word ‘housing’ come up time and again throughout the local government election campaign period, whether it’s from candidates or other voters.

On the ground work assists evicted women 

We know the region has some of the highest rents, and highest housing costs in Australia. We all know that this has virtually eliminated affordable housing. We hear the stories of women and children being evicted, of couch surfing and living in cars.

What do the Tweed Council candidates stand for?

The final day of voting for your local Tweed Shire Councill candidates is Saturday 4 December at a venue near you.

Today is International Day of People with Disability

This language trend around People With a Disability has tended to emphasise the disability rather than the person, which can lead to derogatory labelling, depersonalisation or impersonal, collective references.