Will Shorten stop Adani?

Bill Shorten at the National Press Club this week. Photo AAP

By Giles Parkinson,

You would have missed it, if you were relying on mainstream media, but Labor leader Bill Shorten did actually mention clean energy and climate policies in his scene-setting speech for 2018, which may well turn out to be an election year.

The mainstream media focus was largely on unions, pay, and the proposed integrity commission, but in a much-missed contrast to a government focused on being a major exporter of war machines, backing carbon capture and storage, and backing new coal generation and new thermal coal mines, Shorten had an alternative.

‘If we want lower prices and more secure energy we have to back the transition to renewables,’ he said in his speech to the National Press Club on Tuesday.

‘If we want new industries and new technologies creating new jobs here, then we have to back the transition to renewables.

‘And if we want our kids to be able to take their kids to the reef, then we have to back the transition to renewables.

‘We’re Australians, we’ve got the brains and the get up and go – you bet we can build an energy system where everyone can have energy at an affordable price and indeed, renewables helping the environment.’

So at least one of the major parties is saying it, and the contrast with the Coalition could not be more stark.

A month after the world turned its calendar to 2018, and the growing promise of wind, solar, storage, and electric vehicles, the Coalition appears to have  jumped into a time capsule and set the date for half a century ago.

Its bizarre and ill-founded ranting at renewables and EVs, and its desperation to rediscover the past glories of a ‘nation building project’ like Snowy 2.0 echo that of the Trump administration, which is dismantling environmental protections and chasing a futile goal of ‘saving’ coal.

‘We have ended the war on beautiful clean coal,’ President Trump declared in his State of the Union address. Australia’s Coalition shares Trump’s disregard for technology progress, energy economics and environmental impacts.

That means Shorten can find plenty of fodder against the Coalition rhetoric, and the uncertainty around its proposed National Energy Guarantee.

‘Every time a light globe flickers, the government spend a whole Question Time blaming renewables,’ he said.

‘Yet analysis from Bloomberg New Energy Finance shows the Liberals’ so-called Energy Guarantee would see annual investment in large-scale renewable energy cut by 95 per cent.

‘No serious energy plan, anywhere in the world, is built on the assumption of a decline in renewables investment.

‘It’s like releasing a roads policy based on the resurgence of the horse and cart… or an National Broadband Network based upon copper.’

Shorten re-iterated that Labor’s ‘objectives’ are ‘clear, achievable and responsible’, and include 50 per cent renewables by 2030, a 45 per cent cut in pollution (emissions) by 2030, and zero net pollution by 2050.

The question of how exactly this occurs is still not answered. But one wonders why, with a gift in the form of Craig Kelly spouting such nonsense across the aisle, Labor does not seek to make more of their differences.

Shorten was put on the spot by Katharine Murphy, from the Guardian, the only mainstream publication with a deep and abiding interest in climate and clean energy, about the Galilee Basin, and whether Labor would seek to stop the Adani mine, or just shut its eyes.

It was a well-timed question, given that environmental NGOs are seeking to replicate their success in the recent Queensland state election by targeting the seat of Batman, where Labor’s David Feeney is likely to go back to the polls over his citizenship.

‘You can’t be serious about climate change and energy and have a bet every which way,’ Shorten said. ‘So we’re certainly looking at the Adani matter very closely. If it doesn’t stack up commercially or if it doesn’t stack up environmentally, it will absolutely not receive our support.’

That’s still not saying he will veto it, but it is a step closer.

Shorten promised that he would spend 2018 ‘explaining to people why I think we can do better’, with a particular mention about ‘the hard generational issues, even if it they are politically difficult, even if it means confronting scare campaigns or vested interests.’

Time will tell exactly how far he wants to go with that. Technology, and the plunging costs of renewables, the emergence of storage and the possibilities of a smarter, faster, cleaner, cheaper and more reliable grid, should play into his hands.

As Audrey Zibelman, the head of the Australian Energy Market Operator, told RenewEconomy’s Energy Insiders podcast last year, trying to stop the energy revolution would be like trying to stop the internet.

Prime minister Malcolm Turnbull’s history with the NBN is proof that some governments will try. It’s a yawning chasm that must be filled.


4 responses to “Will Shorten stop Adani?”

  1. Mulch says:

    Of course Shortman will support Adani, after they give a substantial political donation after assessing this thinly veiled threat …

    • Joachim Staats says:

      And let us all remember that last year, in The Australian Senate, Labor joined with The COALition to pass George Brandi’s amendment to Native Title Law that removed a legal objection to the Adani / Carmichael Coalmine. The Shorten is using weasel words like ‘environmental and business case stacking up’ No means No, the Shorten needs to come out and say ‘No Adani”.

  2. Ron Barnes says:

    I doubt Short on will support Adani
    The liberals received a extremely large donation from Adani

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Become a supporter of The Echo

A note from the editorial team

Some of The Echo’s editorial team: journalists Paul Bibby and Aslan Shand, editor Hans Lovejoy, photographer Jeff Dawson and Mandy Nolan

The Echo has never underestimated the intelligence and passion of its readers. In a world of corporate banality and predictability, The Echo has worked hard for more than 30 years to help keep Byron and the north coast unique with quality local journalism and creative ideas. We think this area needs more voices, reasoned analysis and ideas than just those provided by News Corp, lifestyle mags, Facebook groups and corporate newsletters.

The Echo is one hundred per cent locally owned and one hundred per cent independent. As you have probably gathered from what is happening in the media industry, it is not cheap to produce a weekly newspaper and a daily online news service of any quality.

We have always relied entirely on advertising to fund our operations, but often loyal readers who value our local, independent journalism have asked how they could help ensure our survival.

Any support you can provide to The Echo will make an enormous difference. You can make a one-off contribution or a monthly one. With your help, we can continue to support a better informed local community and a healthier democracy for another 30 years.”

Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers.