Menu

Thus Spake Mungo: ScoMo’s radical tax cut to tampons

A group of women (including Greens Senator Janet Rice in the red jacket) demonstrating against the tampon tax at Parliament House in June. Photo Twitter

Sound the trumpets, fire the cannons, stop the presses – Scott Morrison’s fledgling government has actually managed a result.

The GST on tampons is to be abolished. It may have taken 18 years and six prime ministers to achieve this modest outcome, but finally the travesty of regarding women’s essential health products as optional luxury items will be exposed as the absurdity it always was.

So that’s the good news. Now for the rest. And that is when it comes to more wide-ranging policy reform, ad hockery rules. Morrison and his increasingly bewildered treasurer, Josh Frydenberg, are still looking for quick fixes and dodgy bog ups.

The most recent was the lunge to secure the votes of disaffected Sandgropers with a swift cash splash in time for the next election. Morrison, ever the PR man, called it a new, fairer, GST deal, and the West Australians enthusiastically agreed: after all, they got almost all the money, $1.4 billion in the next three years.

Paul Keating once said that the most dangerous place in the world was to stand between a premier and a bucket of money, and both previous and subsequent COAG meetings have proved the truth of his assertion.

But the other five premiers – Liberal as well as Labor – were less impressed. In spite of Frydenberg’s assurances that they would all get a bit of the loot too, they wanted it locked in. They not only wanted more money, they wanted it guaranteed, by legislation, in perpetuity.

This should not have been a surprise: Paul Keating once said that the most dangerous place in the world was to stand between a premier and a bucket of money, and both previous and subsequent COAG meetings have proved the truth of his assertion.

But as usual, the feds were caught unprepared. Frydenberg replied limply that he wanted to make new laws, not worry about the old ones, but given that Morrison had made it clear that he was determined to enshrine his GST fix into legislation to safeguard it from tampering in future, Frydenberg seemed at best ingenuous.

He could perhaps be forgiven for being blindsided; after all he has only just arrived in the job. But Morrison, a former treasurer with many COAGs behind him, had no excuse. Not only did he know just how stubborn the states and territories could be when they put their collective minds to it, and to have been aware that with two of them (Victoria and New South Wales) facing imminent elections they were unlikely to be sympathetic to appeals to assisting the West, but Morrison already knew how fraught GST issues could be.

At the start of 2016 he took the idea of a rejig, simplifying the schedule of exemptions and raising the rate; Malcolm Turnbull promptly kyboshed it as being too expensive and too politically difficult. For ScoMo to imagine that just because he has switched roles he could get away with a chewing gum and fencing wire solution was more than naïve – it was deluded.

But it seems of a pattern with Morrison’s other nostrums. The Royal Commission into Aged Care will have no immediate practical purpose for many months – it was about making a decision for the sake of making a decision. But at least it could be cast as a positive. The same could perhaps be said of the Productivity Commission inquiry into the economic impact of mental health.

But almost all the rest have been negative – dropping the corporate tax cuts, tearing up the much-trumpeted NEG; the latter when the government was already sitting on a report that showed clearly its emissions policy, such as it is, was now going backwards. Then there have been a few lesser inquiries: the ABC, Stuart Roberts, more distractions than serious policy. And the thought bubble of an indigenous day of celebration has mercifully been canned.

It may well be that our current leader is the most assiduous god botherer ever to assume the role. At first blush, the bonanza shovelled out to the Catholics for their already over-funded schools was just another fix. But no, says our evangelical prime minister: this is all about choice.

It would be easy to get the impression that Morrison is more interested in clearing up the rubble of the last five years than in serious agenda of his own. Except in one area: religion.

It may well be that our current leader is the most assiduous god botherer ever to assume the role. At first blush, the bonanza shovelled out to the Catholics for their already over-funded schools was just another fix: buy them off, get the lobby off our back, we really need our votes. But no, says our evangelical prime minister: this is all about choice.

If the religious – well, at least the Christians, although this was all about the Catholics – don’t want to be part of the national, secular, public system, they should not have to do so and we – well, the taxpayers, actually – will pay them to go their own way. It need hardly be said that this is not a privilege accorded in other fields of government: normal workers who do not like their surroundings are not lavishly subsidised to provide others they prefer.

State aid for church schools has been a reality for more than 50 years in Australia, but it has seldom been expressed in such stark terms: if you don’t like the system devised by the constitution, you don’t have to put up with it – as long as the prime minister is one of you, a believer, one whose skin curls (whatever condition that may be) when he sees what goes on in public schools.

Morrison’s Pentecostalism is absolute, beyond even his devotion for his football team, but even he apparently realises that his religious zeal may not be shared with all his fellow Australians. He has already told us that he plans to embrace Phillip Ruddock’s inquiry into enhancing religious privilege, but while he has been enjoying the findings for months, they are still to be kept secret – certainly until the voters of Wentworth convene in a fortnight, before the apprehensive agnostics of Vaucluse are to be told they are not to be numbered among those blessed by their theocratic prime minister.

ScoMo does have his charitable moments; last weekend he admitted that Bill Shorten’s proposal for some pre-schooling for three-year-olds might not be a bad idea — if it was affordable. But that was before his allies in the pages of the Murdoch press discerned that it was actually a dastardly plot to snatch innocent infants from their mothers and deliver them to the Green Left Marxist deviates of the education regime.

Back to the culture wars – taking the tax off tampons was quite radical enough.


6 responses to “Thus Spake Mungo: ScoMo’s radical tax cut to tampons”

  1. Blue says:

    You’re being a bit disingenuous there Mungo, implying that GST is only for “optional luxury items”. The vast majority of GST taxable items are NOT luxury items – school stationery, toilet paper, washing machines, fuel, plumbing services etc etc etc

    • Liz L says:

      Absolutely right. Take a look at your next supermarket docket to see how few items there are not taxed. Unless it is practical for you to make everything from primary ingredients it will be most of it. The sorts of things that are the staple of time poor families, the infirmed or single, often pensioner, households.

  2. robot says:

    More about leaders. If the Greens have moved communities, at a local level in some areas, it is because they welcome party membership and whatever goes with that, commitment to the kind of political system we actually have, not the one we’re going to end up with in a Republican future. Most of us for whatever reasons, some good ones even, are as much to blame for the state of politics as are the brandished leaders and co-leaders we are increasingly expected to vote for or not. It’s all we can talk about. While the actual civic leaders we do vote for put up their feet and enjoy the daily fracas. What has Justine Elliott done for six years but spend every available cent she can find on full page ads? Not just at election time, all the time, and minimal information. Propaganda. If we want to change politics it’s time to get involved. Or our journos will fight the culture wars on our behalves.

  3. Daniel Flesch says:

    Great stuff as usual , Mungo. I still fondly recall the image of the local women throwing tampons at weasel-words , dog-whistling , dissembling non-core promising PM Howard . Stirring episode in the history of Byron Shire.

  4. robot says:

    And a good quote from Keating. These days he’d be hauled into the court and denounced for anti-actuality. Of course journos remember and have their notes, a comma or elipsis to add. The temper of the times, adding like the temperature so they say.

  5. Dutchy says:

    What if parents of children in religious schools, whatever creed or colour, suddenly enrolled their children in public schools? There would have to be more money spent on public schools which would be much more than that spent on religious schools. I am not speaking of the elite schools who already have large sources of income.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Become a supporter of The Echo

A note from the editorial team

Some of The Echo’s editorial team: journalists Paul Bibby and Aslan Shand, editor Hans Lovejoy, photographer Jeff Dawson and Mandy Nolan

The Echo has never underestimated the intelligence and passion of its readers. In a world of corporate banality and predictability, The Echo has worked hard for more than 30 years to help keep Byron and the north coast unique with quality local journalism and creative ideas. We think this area needs more voices, reasoned analysis and ideas than just those provided by News Corp, lifestyle mags, Facebook groups and corporate newsletters.

The Echo is one hundred per cent locally owned and one hundred per cent independent. As you have probably gathered from what is happening in the media industry, it is not cheap to produce a weekly newspaper and a daily online news service of any quality.

We have always relied entirely on advertising to fund our operations, but often loyal readers who value our local, independent journalism have asked how they could help ensure our survival.

Any support you can provide to The Echo will make an enormous difference. You can make a one-off contribution or a monthly one. With your help, we can continue to support a better informed local community and a healthier democracy for another 30 years.”

Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers and is brought to you by this week's sponsor Brunswick Picture House.